I thought he was simply being honest as I've seen for myself quite a few women that would gladly debase themselves with someone rich and powerful that would scream to Kingdom Come if a man with empty pockets did it.
You bring up a good point. It's kind of like the old joke where the man asks the woman if she'll go to bed with him for $20. When she acts outraged he says, "well how about for a million dollars?" In the silence that follows as she mulls that one over in her head the man says, "we've already established what type of woman you are, we're just negotiating price".
I guess we're all guilty of picking and choosing when we're upset over actions that are very similar but cause different reactions internally. Maybe I don't like the loud car next to me at the traffic light but two blocks later a loud '71 Chevelle SS pull up next to me and I think it's awesome. Similar situation, different reaction.
But most people would agree that's a little thing. It doesn't amount to a hill of beans when compare to something as earth shattering such as genocide in Africa. And from what I can tell people have a different reaction to genocide in Africa than they do to genocide in the Middle East. That's not a little thing at all. Genocide would be at the other end of the scale. Yet genocide does not receive the same reaction universally, it depends upon circumstances.
Many of the same people upset with Trump's vulgar remark about women have no problem whatsoever placing Bill Clinton on a pedestal. They've rationalized Clinton's behavior 100 ways to Sunday and made him the unofficial leader of the Democratic Party for decades. Odd when you consider words are a little thing but no one would call rape a little thing.
People pick and choose their outrage which really shouldn't matter all that much when it comes to little things. But they should never pick and choose their outrage when it comes to really important matters.
