RE: Concerns about higher deficits.
The above concern shows typical STATIC thinking. Few people ever consider the DYNAMIC result of corporate tax cuts and what it will do to encourage the formation and expansion of new businesses, and of course -- creation of employment and thus, tax payers.
A substantially lower corporate tax rate would probably result in less corporate tax revenue collected by the federal government, but it would also create a lot of jobs and increase tax revenue from personal income taxes and payroll taxes.
Higher employment also cuts government spending on welfare, food stamps, medicaid, and other social programs that benefit unemployed workers.
So , a major corporate tax cut would not increase total government deficits at the federal and state levels, and would create jobs for millions of Americans and greatly improve the lives of millions of our people, without increasing government budget deficits.
HISTORY gives us the evidence. Just look at the results of the JFK tax cuts in the 1960's and the Reagan tax cuts in the 1980's:
Federal revenue in 1960 = $92.5 B
Federal revenue in 1968 = $153.0 B
Over a 50% increase in revenue!
Federal revenue in 1980 = $517.5 B
Federal revenue in 1989 = $909.0 B
Over a 70% increase in revenue!
The problem is NOT the tax cut, the problem ( as history tells us ), is what government does with the INCREASED REVENUE that will come in tot he treasury. If you are thinking of "MORE GOVERNMENT SPENDING", go to the head of the class.