Author Topic: California judge questions Trump order to cut funds to 'sanctuary cities'  (Read 404 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest

California judge questions Trump order to cut funds to 'sanctuary cities'

    "What is this executive order about, then?" the judge asked a government lawyer who said Trump's order doesn't really ask anything more than what existing federal law already does

    By Doug G. Ware | April 14, 2017 at 5:38 PM

    April 14 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump's attempt to block federal funding to so-called "sanctuary cities" in the United States met with some skepticism in federal court Friday, indicating that the president may encounter yet more legal trouble getting one of his executive orders into play.

    U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick in the Northern District of California began hearing arguments in a federal lawsuit aimed at blocking Trump's plan to punish U.S. municipalities that refuse to participate in certain deportation scenarios.

    The order, which Trump signed five days after he took office in January, threatens to cut off some federal funding unless certain cities and counties begin acting on detainer orders from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

 

    http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2017/...9471492199115/


Offline truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,386
  • Gender: Male
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
The left act as though these funds are "entitlements," with no criteria attached.

This should be an example for Congress to hurry up and pass legislation, for Trump to sign. That way it is a law, not merely an EO.

"God must love the common man, he made so many of them.�  Abe Lincoln