Traitor? He was simply doing his job as a judge.
I absolutely disagree. There is no support in the law for Obamacare. Roberts had to do a sleigh of hand just to make up a ridiculous argument to act as a fig leaf for his betrayal.
He called it a "tax" when in fact, congress explicitly said it was not a tax, because if it were a tax, it would have had to originate in the House, per constitutional requirements.
No, Robert's was not doing his job as a Judge. He was acting as an Obama boot lick for some reason.
Are you demanding that judges act as political animals?
When one side is absolutely correct, and when going along with the correct side is indistinguishable from acting as a "political animal" then I say go for it.
The Liberal judges vote en bloc, so I don't see "political animal" as being very different from what the Supreme Court already is.
The "Fascist garbage" you refer to was the individual mandate.
No, it's the whole thing and all of it's pieces. As a matter of principle, the government has no business being involved in healthcare (beyond regulating safety and criminal behavior) at all.
That mandate (as well as the employer mandate) would have been eliminated by the AHCA. The survival of that "fascist garbage" is the direct result of the obstruction of the Freedom Caucus. So give Justice Roberts a break.
No, it's the direct consequence of that lying snake bastard ignoring actual law, and allowing that abomination to survive a court challenge. It's the direct consequence of the New York Liberal Democrat controlled propaganda system pushing into power an affirmative action imbecile.
The New York Liberal Democrat propaganda system is where the consequences of this folly need to be addressed.
