Author Topic: Walker opposes Trump over Great Lakes funding  (Read 1113 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TomSea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40,432
  • Gender: Male
  • All deserve a trial if accused
Walker opposes Trump over Great Lakes funding
« on: March 18, 2017, 12:56:26 pm »
Quote
Walker opposes Trump over Great Lakes funding

MADISON, Wis. —

Gov. Scott Walker on Thursday reiterated his opposition to President Donald Trump's proposal to remove federal funding for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative.

Walker spoke to the Associated Press after the president released his budget calling for elimination of the funding that has sent $2.2 billion to the eight-state region since 2009.

Walker said "it makes sense for us to continue to make prudent investments in protecting and improving the Great Lakes." It was a similar response he gave WISN 12 NEWS when he was asked about the proposal on Tuesday during a visit with the Rotary Club of Milwaukee.

More: http://www.wisn.com/article/walker-opposes-trump-over-great-lakes-funding/9142665

Quote
http://www.wisn.com/article/trump-seeks-elimination-of-great-lakes-restoration-funding/9140911
A Trump campaign representative said last fall the Republican nominee supported the program.

Offline Cripplecreek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,718
  • Gender: Male
  • Constitutional Extremist
Re: Walker opposes Trump over Great Lakes funding
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2017, 01:48:49 pm »
The real problem is that Obama dumped billions into the pockets of multiple czars who were tasked with dealing with great lakes issues and the money vaporized like always leaving legitimate issues ignored. Dealing with invasive species, dredging shipping channels, and mitigating sewage releases into the lakes are legitimate issues.

Personally I would put someone like Bill Schuette in charge. He's been very effective in dealing with this sort of thing as attorney general after Rick Snyder reorganized and put pollution control under the jurisdiction of the attorney general's office. One good result is that the company operating the pipeline across the Mackinac strait found missing support struts so they upgraded the pipeline above and beyond current standards without being asked to do so.

Its a direct contrast with the situation under Granholm that led to the Embridge pipeline spill. Granholm never even hired the required state pipeline inspector meaning there was no immediate incentive for Embridge to inspect.