Author Topic: Replaced? Security Force Assistance Brigades vs. Special Forces  (Read 363 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Replaced? Security Force Assistance Brigades vs. Special Forces
Tim Ball
February 23, 2017

SF-Colombia
For special access to experts and other members of the national security community, check out the new War on the Rocks membership.
Print Friendly



The U.S. Army recently announced it would be standing up six security force assistance brigades (SFABs), designed to provide the Army with units specifically trained to work as military advisors. As part of their training pipeline, these advisors will likely receive cultural and language training to facilitate working with their partner forces. They will have to become experts in small unit tactics and maneuver warfare, be comfortable living and eating with their host nation counterparts, and be willing to endure hardships in harsh environments across the world. This type of advisor might sound familiar, because they already exist. As the old cadence goes, “See that man in the green beret? Teaching’s how he earns his pay.” If Army leadership needs soldiers to serve as the, “day-to-day experts combatant commanders need to train, advise, and assist our partners overseas,” why aren’t they turning to Army Special Forces – a unit specifically designed to train, advise, and assist other military forces? Taking a broad look at Special Forces over the last 15 years provides some possible answers to this question.

There’s Already an Elite Advisory Force

https://warontherocks.com/2017/02/replaced-security-force-assistance-brigades-vs-special-forces/
« Last Edit: March 03, 2017, 10:57:49 am by rangerrebew »