The Supreme Court Just Advanced A Lawsuit To Nullify The 2016 Election

[mrclose]

I am only posting this to make folks aware of just how evil and desperate the opposition party is!

Yes, the linked site is a radical leftist hangout but the information is true.

I have searched everywhere and have failed to find this on any conservative site!

This is a motion, submitted to the Supreme Court, asking for the nullification of the election .. based upon Russian interference.

I doubt that it (the motion) will go anywhere but as I said .. We need to be aware of the evil that is being plotted, behind the scenes on a daily bases!



http://occupydemocrats.com/2017/02/23/supreme-court-just-advanced-law-suit-nullify-2016-election/

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

From what I understand: it's a "writ of certiorari". The birthers filed tons of them:

[/size]https://www.google.com/search?q=writ+of+certiorari&oq=writ+of+certiorari&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#safe=off&q=birther+writ+of+certiorari&*
[/color]
[/size][/color]
[/size]It means jack squat.[/color]

[Sanguine]

bookmark.

[don-o]

@Mod1

Move to Alternate Realities?

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

Means jack squat:


http://lawnewz.com/uncategorized/u-s-supreme-court-will-get-a-look-at-case-about-ted-cruzs-eligibility-to-be-president/

In fact, Ted Cruz’s attorneys have until May 5, 2016 to respond to the petition for writ of certiorari. A cert petition is filed by a losing party in a lawsuit asking the Supreme Court to review a lower court’s decision. Of course, that doesn’t mean the Supreme Court will take up the case, they could deny it. Nevertheless, it is an interesting development in the so-called Ted Cruz birther saga, which of course was fueled by his opponent in the Republican presidential race, Donald Trump.

[Cyber Liberty]

From what I understand: it's a "writ of certiorari". The birthers filed tons of them

The article states it's a Writ of Mandamus.  It's a request to jump all the lower courts, and you're correct, doesn't mean squat.  The precedents cited for "redo" are all foreign. 

[ABX]

From what I understand: it's a "writ of certiorari". The birthers filed tons of them:

[/size]https://www.google.com/search?q=writ+of+certiorari&oq=writ+of+certiorari&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#safe=off&q=birther+writ+of+certiorari&*
[/color]
[/size][/color]
[/size]It means jack squat.[/color]

Yep, pretty much anyone can file a writ like this for anything. All this means really is that a clerk received it and filed it, not that it has a chance of getting anywhere beyond a dusty filing cabinet.

[mrclose]

As I said, this probably wont go anywhere but it does show that these folks aren't giving up.

http://progressivearmy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/170108-Motion-to-Stay-for-filing.pdf

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

Imagine the shitstorm if the USSC just nullified the election with the stroke of a pen.


With the current level of acrimony in the country there'd be a civil war like the world has never seen before.


Just my opinion of course.

[Cyber Liberty]

Imagine the shitstorm if the USSC just nullified the election with the stroke of a pen.


With the current level of acrimony in the country there'd be a civil war like the world has never seen before.


Just my opinion of course.

The Rats have been claiming the SCOTUS did exactly that in 2000.

[Hoodat]

An individual does not have standing to sue since our President is not elected by individuals, but by States.

[Cyber Liberty]

An individual does not have standing to sue since our President is not elected by individuals, but by States.

You are absolutely correct.  My curiosity is, how will the courts twist this to benefit Democrats after spending eight years assuring us otherwise (about the negative standing)?  They don't operate under the rule of law anymore, so it's a crapshoot.

[jmyrlefuller]

An individual does not have standing to sue since our President is not elected by individuals, but by States.

Actually, it's the electors who have the standing... and there are a few who could have a case, but because they're not enough to change the outcome, even that wouldn't change the election.

[Cyber Liberty]

Actually, it's the electors who have the standing... and there are a few who could have a case, but because they're not enough to change the outcome, even that wouldn't change the election.

IIRC, one of the birther lawsuits was brought by an elector, and was thrown out for lack of standing.

[geronl]

The Supreme Court did not advance anything and it's not even an actual lawsuit plus, it's not really within the courts power

[240B]

Fake News. But considering the source, what else could it possibly be? Anyone expecting actual journalism from a site like this one must also believe that Hillary really is secretly married to a space alien.

[Emjay]

As I said, this probably wont go anywhere but it does show that these folks aren't giving up.

http://progressivearmy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/170108-Motion-to-Stay-for-filing.pdf

Were you under the impression that these 'folks' might be giving up?

[Luis Gonzalez]

I'm waiting for the Courts to hand down a decision on my lawsuit to negate the outcome of the Cowboys/Packers playoff game.

[libertybele]

Imagine the shitstorm if the USSC just nullified the election with the stroke of a pen.


With the current level of acrimony in the country there'd be a civil war like the world has never seen before.


Just my opinion of course.

For once you and I agree; there would be a civil war like none other.