You suggest I'm the one for psychiatric treatment, when you're the one obsessed with my personal and professional life?! Well, since you evidently don't have much of your own, I'll oblige you and let you know that I was at a scientific conference.
Now, think back to the last scientific conference you attended -- you might have just played on your laptop or phone, but I attend them to accomplish things. When I'm not attending the technical or poster sessions, I use the opportunity to attend receptions and network, for the chance to exchange information and ideas -- especially with international colleagues. Finally, on evenings where I didn't just chow down at the nicely furnished receptions, I sampled the local cuisine and nightlife.
I'd say that I'm SO sorry I didn't take time out to respond to your bizarre tirades, but, frankly, I'm not.
There... satisfied?
(Note...I insulted you only after you began with the circus act...)
hah hah More insults. Circus act? You admit that you insulted me instead of answering substantively because you, in your arrogant lunacy, deemed my very substantive posts a "circus act". Great excuse for not responding substantively. I call BS.
Here is what happened. Suppressed got scared and reacted defensively likely because he's apparently not used to being challenged directly by equally-informed people. He tries to cow people with minutiae and abstruse verbiage and it works much of the time. But not on me. I easily refuted the argument supporting carbon-driven downward radiative forcing. Then Suppressed panicked. Instead of responding substantively (which he still hasn't done), he resigned from the discussion and (coincidentally ) suddenly "left town" for three weeks to rub elbows with the great and the near great (which he then came back and bragged about over and over again as if my own challenge is beneath his lofty station heh) .
Clearly that rapid evacuation from the forum was not a coincidence but because Suppressed had no substantive answer to the challenge. Now he AGAIN refuses to answer the carbon-driven downward radiative forcing response and to avoid revealing his defeat, starts insulting me again. Now I am according to him, conducting a "circus" and so am unworthy of a substantively response. hah hah nice evasion.
In psychology we call that "defensive behavior". It is a very transparent method to avoid admitting ignorance or error used by insecure / arrogant people. Bob and weave but don't respond directly. Also used in trial law. Common garden variety evasion. Witness is unresponsive.
Don't bother trying to answer now. You have committed to taking refuge in those common evasions - credentialism and vituperation. Easier to try to stultify and attack your opponent than to respond substantively. I get it. That or maybe you could try the other favored method of people evading a substantive exchange, insisting that you have responded directly already. I might go with that one if I were you. It suits your proclivity to obfuscate much better.
Circus act certainly describes the entire mendacious, self-adoring panoply of conceited sophomores with hard science degrees who are too arrogant to invite people with non-technical degrees into the decision-making process. Such types avoid responding when challenged by fleeing for weeks with the lame excuse that they are "out of town" and "too busy" to respond. hah hah Such transparent BS.
Maybe you haven't been paying attention Walter White, the word "scientist" has lost the immunity to being questioned the left has invested in it. People with technical degrees or job titles are not priests who may look down on "commners" with disdain, so come down from your lofty BS/avoidance of normal back-and-forth and participate in the forum. Take your "credentialsm" excuse and put it away somewhere with the excessive egotism.
I'll gladly debate you on another thread point by point so that you can demonstrate your own trapeze skills and semantic acrobatics. Unless of course you are "too busy" (rolls eyes) or too superior to respond substantively. In which case you should not post.
