Author Topic: One piece of the Trump executive order speaks to the issue of whether communities have any say in the refugee placement process  (Read 601 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
One piece of the Trump executive order speaks to the issue of whether communities have any say in the refugee placement process

Posted by Ann Corcoran on January 31, 2017
trump-watch

Trump Watch!

There is so much to try to absorb in the President’s Executive Order on refugees, but here is one portion to pay some attention to for those of you working in ‘pockets of resistance.’

It is Section 5 (g):

(g) It is the policy of the executive branch that, to the extent permitted by law and as practicable, State and local jurisdictions be granted a role in the process of determining the placement or settlement in their jurisdictions of aliens eligible to be admitted to the United States as refugees. To that end, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall examine existing law to determine the extent to which, consistent with applicable law, State and local jurisdictions may have greater involvement in the process of determining the placement or resettlement of refugees in their jurisdictions, and shall devise a proposal to lawfully promote such involvement.

Indeed this point, that local communities (and states!) have no say in the refugee resettlement process as it has been done for over 3 decades now is one of my basic complaints for the almost ten years I’ve been writing this blog.

Politico began whining about the Trump Administration giving more leeway to states here already a few days ago;

Offline don-o

  • Worldview Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,280
  • FR Class of '98
Don't most of the states farm this out to NGO's like Catholic Charities?

geronl

  • Guest

Politico began whining about the Trump Administration giving more leeway to states here already a few days ago;

It doesn't actually, it says to comply with existing law on the subject. Those laws have been long-ignored but they were on the books. An executive order cannot grant anything to state and local authorities that doesn't already exist (even if just on paper)