Author Topic: What Do We Know About School Discipline Reform?  (Read 888 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
What Do We Know About School Discipline Reform?
« on: January 24, 2017, 01:46:56 pm »
What Do We Know About School Discipline Reform?
Education Next Issue Cover
Assessing the alternatives to suspensions and expulsions


By Matthew P. Steinberg and Johanna Lacoe

Print | PDF | Share

WINTER 2017 / VOL. 17, NO. 1

Matthew P. Steinberg joined Marty West on the EdNext Podcast to discuss school discipline policies.

ednext_XVII_1_steinberg_img01

The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights announced this spring that the number of suspensions and expulsions in the nation’s public schools had dropped 20 percent between 2012 and 2014.

The news was welcomed by those who oppose the frequent use of suspensions and expulsions, known as exclusionary discipline. In recent years, many policymakers and educators have called for the adoption of alternative disciplinary strategies that allow students to stay in school and not miss valuable learning time. Advocates for discipline reform contend that suspensions are meted out in a biased way, because minority students and those with disabilities receive a disproportionate share of them. Some also assert that reducing suspensions would improve school climate for all students.

Government leaders have taken steps to encourage school discipline reform. The Obama administration has embarked on several initiatives to encourage schools to move away from suspensions and toward alternative strategies. In 2011, the Department of Education (DOE) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) launched the Supportive School Discipline Initiative to coordinate federal efforts in this area. In January 2014, the DOE released a resource package with a variety of informational materials designed to support state and local efforts to improve school climate and discipline. The package included a “Dear Colleague” letter, issued jointly by DOE and DOJ, warning against intentional racial discrimination but also stating that schools unlawfully discriminate even “if a policy is neutral on its face—meaning that the policy itself does not mention race—and is administered in an evenhanded manner but has a disparate impact, i.e., a disproportionate and unjustified effect on students of a particular race.”

http://educationnext.org/what-do-we-know-about-school-discipline-reform-suspensions-expulsions/
« Last Edit: January 24, 2017, 01:47:32 pm by rangerrebew »