Hoodat, I have no interest in arguing abortion with you.
Translation: I am unable to come up with a legal basis for denying Federal and State legislatures the Constitutional right to establish their own laws regarding abortion.
I think it's wrong just as you do
But not as wrong as protecting a unique individual life inside the womb.
but I oppose the government imposing my or your morality on others.
BS. You are the one her supporting the government imposing the morality of five men in black robes upon the rest of the nation while denying self-determination to the citizenry in shaping the very society in which we live.
States have laws against theft. These laws impose someone's morality upon the society of a State. So who gets to decide what set of moral rules are imposed? The people of that State, of course. This is how our Founding Fathers intended it. We the people choose who will govern us. We the people choose how our society will be shaped. We the people choose to protect property rights by passing laws against theft. This wasn't done by five tyrants in black robes. It was done by the very people who live in that society. That isn't government-imposed morality. That is a legally binding moral code chosen by the people, for the people.
Yet you are the one who demand that the citizenry be denied that right. It is you imposing your morality on the rest of us using the point of a government gun while denying us the ability to assess for our own society exactly where the line should be drawn.
It is you, sir, that sides with tyranny. It is you forcing your belief on us without recourse. And it is you that tramples on the Constitution of the United States of America just because you arrogantly think you know what is better for the citizens of Georgia.
This is a decision that every adult woman in America has had the right to make FOR HERSELF for over 40 years now.
And slavery was a decision that every slave owner in American had the right to make for him/herself for over 80 years.
That is how is should be, and must remain.
Again, based upon what? Emotion? Seriously, you keep repeating that claim - that it must remain legal. But you have absolutely zero to back it up. So we have the Constitution of the United States of America on one side, and your baseless emotional appeal on the other. How do you suppose those two line up?
I am sick of this issue keeping conservatives and libertarians from advancing their agendas.
I am sick of people pretending to be libertarians yet advocating tyranny. Upholding the Constitution is my agenda. What is yours?
It is a narrow issue pushed by religious social conservatives, and they simply cannot be permitted to have their way, at the expense of the rest of our issues.
What does religion have to do with this? It is a Constitutional issue - not a religious one. Roe would have been equally egregious if it had banned abortion in every state.
Why should any woman agree to the abrogation of the most precious right she possesses?
The most precious right she possesses? Really? You actually think that the right to kill a child is the most precious right a woman has? Wow. Just wow.
