Author Topic: Portlandia  (Read 2254 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LateForLunch

  • GOTWALMA Get Out of the Way and Leave Me Alone! (Nods to Teebone)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,349
Portlandia
« on: January 04, 2017, 08:40:03 pm »
 I also posted this on the Politics thread. But I wanted to share my discovery of the amazing Portlandia show. Watch the Portlandia video first and you will appreciate just how stupid the 'Crats have become.

They are officially a party of clowns. Seriously...

Check it out:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9LJbngiWwk

http://nation.foxnews.com/2017/01/04/they-just-dont-get-it-hysterical-celebs-beg-congress-stand-trump
« Last Edit: January 04, 2017, 08:41:20 pm by LateForLunch »
GOTWALMA Get out of the way and leave me alone! (Nods to General Teebone)

geronl

  • Guest
Re: Portlandia
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2017, 08:50:07 pm »
The show is parody-comedy, it's not really a documentary series

Offline LateForLunch

  • GOTWALMA Get Out of the Way and Leave Me Alone! (Nods to Teebone)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,349
Re: Portlandia
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2017, 03:31:58 pm »
The show is parody-comedy, it's not really a documentary series
Uh. O.K. 'Not sure why you thought you had to mention that, but thanks for sharing.
GOTWALMA Get out of the way and leave me alone! (Nods to General Teebone)

Offline Maj. Bill Martin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,856
  • Gender: Male
  • I'll make Mincemeat out of 'em"
Re: Portlandia
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2017, 05:14:38 pm »
That's hilarious.  Great takedown of those stupid Hollywood lefty videos.

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,986
  • Gender: Female
  • Ex-member
Re: Portlandia
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2017, 06:27:01 pm »
Pretty funny.

Silver Pines

  • Guest
Re: Portlandia
« Reply #5 on: January 07, 2017, 12:18:42 am »
I also posted this on the Politics thread. But I wanted to share my discovery of the amazing Portlandia show. Watch the Portlandia video first and you will appreciate just how stupid the 'Crats have become.

They are officially a party of clowns. Seriously...

Check it out:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9LJbngiWwk

http://nation.foxnews.com/2017/01/04/they-just-dont-get-it-hysterical-celebs-beg-congress-stand-trump


@LateForLunch

That's very good.

Offline goatprairie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,955
Re: Portlandia
« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2017, 03:20:44 pm »
"Portlandia" is a very funny show. I'll bet Fred Armisen is a lib, but he skewers virtually all lib symbols and sacred cows.  I wonder how libs take the show.

Offline LateForLunch

  • GOTWALMA Get Out of the Way and Leave Me Alone! (Nods to Teebone)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,349
Re: Portlandia
« Reply #7 on: January 16, 2017, 04:28:58 am »
"Portlandia" is a very funny show. I'll bet Fred Armisen is a lib, but he skewers virtually all lib symbols and sacred cows.  I wonder how libs take the show.

Point of information: I never call self described liberals what they call themselves. I don't refer to people I don't respect by what they prefer to call themselves. I call ISIS daesh aka "the filthy ones" or something like that in Arabic (which the muzz scum HATE). I don't refer to self-described Environmentalists as such, I call them ecoparanoids, which is what they are. The Nazis called themselves National Socialists or something like that, and they disliked being called Nazis - so they were called Nazis by everyone who disliked or hated them. Muzz self-described jihadists call themselves that because that is Arabic for "holy warriors". I call them "muzz terrorist-scum" or "Salafist-scum" or "radical Islamist-scum" or "fundie Islamist/militant Arab(FIMA) -scum" or "Twelver-scum" but not jihadists.

So in that same vein, I like to call self-described liberals "leftists", "far-leftists", "radical leftists", "radical socialists" or "anti-conservative fanatics". The reason they don't deserve the label of liberal is that modern leftist ideology is so far removed from Classical Liberalism (upon which the ideological foundations of modern western Civilization are largely built) that it is a very,very bad joke. Virtually all of the positive values associated with Classical Liberalism (egalitarianism, reform/restraint/reduction of government power, libertarianism (aka little "l" as in the opposite of Statism), fair/reduced taxation, promotion of popular prosperity not plutocratic aristocracy, are all vested far more in the modern conservative movement and therefore the (conservative side of) the Republican party than in any smallest vestige of the modern political left. Liberals aren't. They resemble something that is only really defined by opposition to conservatism and far-leftist, oligarchic Statism.   
« Last Edit: January 16, 2017, 04:34:51 am by LateForLunch »
GOTWALMA Get out of the way and leave me alone! (Nods to General Teebone)

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
Re: Portlandia
« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2017, 06:20:59 am »
Did everyone just crawl out from under a rock? This show has been on for a while. Season 7 just kicked off a couple weeks ago on IFC.


Offline LateForLunch

  • GOTWALMA Get Out of the Way and Leave Me Alone! (Nods to Teebone)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,349
Re: Portlandia
« Reply #9 on: January 16, 2017, 01:05:14 pm »

Well, Frankly there has been a lot going on. Some of us on this forum still have full time jobs. I hate to admit that I am still catching up on Breaking Bad. My goodness. That is one King Hell of a show. It's fairly easy to tell which of our posters are retired, simply by noting which ones are fully up to speed on things like the best programming of the last few years!  :thud:
« Last Edit: January 16, 2017, 01:06:19 pm by LateForLunch »
GOTWALMA Get out of the way and leave me alone! (Nods to General Teebone)

Offline goatprairie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,955
Re: Portlandia
« Reply #10 on: January 16, 2017, 02:51:12 pm »
Point of information: I never call self described liberals what they call themselves. I don't refer to people I don't respect by what they prefer to call themselves. I call ISIS daesh aka "the filthy ones" or something like that in Arabic (which the muzz scum HATE). I don't refer to self-described Environmentalists as such, I call them ecoparanoids, which is what they are. The Nazis called themselves National Socialists or something like that, and they disliked being called Nazis - so they were called Nazis by everyone who disliked or hated them. Muzz self-described jihadists call themselves that because that is Arabic for "holy warriors". I call them "muzz terrorist-scum" or "Salafist-scum" or "radical Islamist-scum" or "fundie Islamist/militant Arab(FIMA) -scum" or "Twelver-scum" but not jihadists.

So in that same vein, I like to call self-described liberals "leftists", "far-leftists", "radical leftists", "radical socialists" or "anti-conservative fanatics". The reason they don't deserve the label of liberal is that modern leftist ideology is so far removed from Classical Liberalism (upon which the ideological foundations of modern western Civilization are largely built) that it is a very,very bad joke. Virtually all of the positive values associated with Classical Liberalism (egalitarianism, reform/restraint/reduction of government power, libertarianism (aka little "l" as in the opposite of Statism), fair/reduced taxation, promotion of popular prosperity not plutocratic aristocracy, are all vested far more in the modern conservative movement and therefore the (conservative side of) the Republican party than in any smallest vestige of the modern political left. Liberals aren't. They resemble something that is only really defined by opposition to conservatism and far-leftist, oligarchic Statism.
There are libs and there are leftists. Many times the divisions overlap, but I try to make a distinction. I have a lib stepdaughter. She  and her husband  vote Dem all the time but otherwise live very conservative lives. Her husband  loves guns, hunting and fishing, is religious, and is a Boy Scouts leader. He didn't like Obama.   Both are anti-drug and do not want legalization of recreational drugs.
They live conservative lives but always vote for Dems.
Now, leftists are something different. Leftists seek a complete change in society ordered on radical leftist standards.
 Many libs are like my stepdaughters and her husband. They vote foolishly against their interests, but they do not seek a radical transformation of the country. They like it just the way it is for the most part.
But they do not understand how voting for Dem pols, who are mostly radical leftists, are ruining the country.

« Last Edit: January 16, 2017, 02:54:08 pm by goatprairie »

Offline goatprairie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,955
Re: Portlandia
« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2017, 02:52:50 pm »
Well, Frankly there has been a lot going on. Some of us on this forum still have full time jobs. I hate to admit that I am still catching up on Breaking Bad. My goodness. That is one King Hell of a show. It's fairly easy to tell which of our posters are retired, simply by noting which ones are fully up to speed on things like the best programming of the last few years!  :thud:
BB is the best show ever. Bryan  Cranston might be a brain dead lib, but he's great in this as are many other actors in the series.

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,986
  • Gender: Female
  • Ex-member
Re: Portlandia
« Reply #12 on: January 16, 2017, 02:54:58 pm »
There are libs and there are leftists. Many times the divisions overlap, but I try to make a distinction. I have a lib stepdaughter. She  and her husband  vote Dem all the time but otherwise live very conservative lives. Her husband  loves guns, hunting and fishing, is religious, and is a Boy Scouts leader. He didn't like Obama.   Both are anti-drug and do not want legalization of recreational drugs.
They live conservative lives but always vote for Dems.
Now, leftists are something different. Leftists seek a complete change in society ordered on radical leftist standards.
 Many libs are like my stepdaughters and her husband. They vote foolishly against their interests, but they do not seek a radical transformation of the country. They like it just the way it is for the most part.
But they do not understand how voting for Dem pols, who are mostly radical leftists, are ruining the country.

I don't understand - why would they continually vote against their belief system?

Offline LateForLunch

  • GOTWALMA Get Out of the Way and Leave Me Alone! (Nods to Teebone)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,349
Re: Portlandia
« Reply #13 on: January 16, 2017, 09:41:42 pm »
I don't understand - why would they continually vote against their belief system?

If I may, please allow me to explain. There are two basic types of personalities - thinking-centered and feeling/intuition centered. Many people are basically thinking-centered in their working lives and in matters of day-to-day practicality. But in peripheral matters where their own immediate best interests are not at issue, they somehow dissociate and allow their feeling/intuition-centered cognition to dominate.

For thinking-centered people to hold a strong opinion, they require some sort of strong rational argument with facts, logic, figures, reason etc.

For feeling/intuition-centered personalities, all they need to hold a strong opinion is a strong feeling or intuition. For such people rational information such as facts, figures, logic, reason are of secondary (or lower) priority in their consideration.

Whereas thinking-centered people often  use deductive reasoning to arrive at conclusions, feeling/intuition-centered people use what CG Jung called "impressions" which are a random mélange of various bits of rational information (often selected inductively, not deductively that is "cherry-picked" to support a pre-decided  conclusion) combined with intuitive snipets of past experiences which relate to the topic.

Sometimes people who are required to be hyper-rational in their professional lives seem to fall back into hyper emotional/intuitive reasoning in matters like politics or other things - almost as if they are compensating in their consciousness for being obliged to be so strongly rational in their work.

Many times, however, it is just a matter of habit or convenience. They have coworker, bosses or other close relations who are leftists and it's more convenient or fun for them to adopt leftist attitudes than conservative ones. Many far leftists I have encountered are not very serious-minded about their political views but maintain them much the way a hobbyist maintains a collection of comic books, coins or stamps. They never invest much thought or effort into the endeavor and seem to resent people who respond to their casual attitude as if it is in any way irrational or inappropriate.

Some people consider intensity on the topic of politics or ideology a sign of inferiority or being a "bad person" in  some way. I don't claim to fully understand such attitudes, I just observe them sometimes and take note.

For the most part, I think political conservatives tend to be a little more (in some cases a lot more) serious minded about life than leftists - who often view life as being largely a matter of convenience and fun, not serious, thoughtful consideration or consistent moral doctrine.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2017, 09:46:50 pm by LateForLunch »
GOTWALMA Get out of the way and leave me alone! (Nods to General Teebone)

Offline goatprairie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,955
Re: Portlandia
« Reply #14 on: January 17, 2017, 05:32:41 am »
I don't understand - why would they continually vote against their belief system?
Oh, they believe in some lib things, but I'm basically talking about how they live their lives. They live like conservatives but vote for libs. Many Dem voters live conservative lives but vote for leftist Dem pols....because they think they're on the side of goodness and niceness while icky, nasty Republicans hate people and want to kill them. My lib stepdaughters don't believe the latter about my wife and I, but they do think Dems care about people and Republicans don't.  The gov. wants to do wonderful things for the poor, and those nasty, old Republicans are always against it.  That's the way they think.
My lib stepdaughter said if she won the lottery, she'd give all the money to poor people. I told her that they'd probably fritter away whatever money you gave them and be back to where they were in no time. I asked her wouldn't it be better to make them work a little for what they got?
 She shook her head at me, oh no, these people have been oppressed and just need a little help. Where have we heard that before?