Author Topic: AP, Others Fret Over Same Number of Ex-Military Trump Appointments As Obama Originally Made  (Read 417 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest

AP, Others Fret Over Same Number of Ex-Military Trump Appointments As Obama Originally Made
By Tom Blumer | December 9, 2016 | 5:15 PM EST
0
shares

Some Democratic Party politicians who are searching for any and every possible reason to have a problem with President-Elect Donald Trump's cabinet appointments have latched on to the supposedly troubling fact that it thus far contains three retired generals out of 15 ultimate appointments. Naturally, their allies in the establishment press are amplifying these petty concerns.

The Associated Press's Lolita C. Baldor was a relatively early adopter, claiming a week ago, with alternating bouts of hyperventilation and hostility, that "Congress and others" are struggling with "a broader worry about an increased militarization of American policy" because of Trump's "move to pack his administration with military brass." Baldor has been an AP reporter for 11 years, covering matters relating to the Pentagon, counterterrorism and national security, so there's no excuse for her not recalling recent history which refutes her concern.

Here are Baldor's first five paragraphs in full (bolds are mine throughout this post):
 
Source URL: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tom-blumer/2016/12/09/ap-others-fret-over-same-number-ex-military-trump-appointments-obama

Offline Puss-N-Boots

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 714
  • Gender: Female
  • God. Family. Seahawks!
I find having military brass on the staff comforting.  They are "doers" and not in it for money or glory.
The Constitution is not a suggestion.

Offline bolobaby

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,373
Respect our vets - hire a vet!

Oh, wait... Trump is doing the hiring? VETS ARE EEEEEVIL and should not be allowed into public service!
How to lose credibility while posting:
1. Trump is never wrong.
2. Default to the most puerile emoticon you can find. This is especially useful when you can't win an argument on merits.
3. Be falsely ingratiating, completely but politely dismissive without talking to the points, and bring up Hillary whenever the conversation is really about conservatism.
4. When all else fails, remember rule #1 and #2. Emoticons are like the poor man's tweet!