He makes a good point by saying that evolutionists compare all of us to apes as the foundation of their theory. Of that, there is no question. However, he got it wrong with this statement.
Now the big question. If something evolves into something else, that result is what remains forever. The former creature that we evolved from would be no more. So why do we still see apes and chimps prominently in existence? They could no longer be here if they had evolved into something else. The answer: They COULD NOT still be in existence since the original would have been wiped out by Darwin’s ridiculous theory.
This is simply not true. One of the foundations of evolutionary theory is the occurrence of mutations. A super-smart mutation of a species of ape a million years ago, would not in any way mean that the other apes which did not have this mutation would cease to exist. There would be a fork in the evolutionary path of the two species. The mutated apes would branch off to form their own species, presumably us, and the original apes would continue on their own path separately. As some humans moved north away from the burning sun of the equator, they no longer needed the sun protecting pigmentation of their ancestors. The humans which did not move north remained as they were.
There is no evidence to support the premise that once an evolutionary branch occurs in evolution, a mutation, that the original branch ceases to exist afterward. You can imagine a drought where most land vegetation is wiped out. The only horses to survive are the horses that have necks long enough to eat leaves from the trees. As these horses breed, the necks get longer. As competition for the leaves develops, the necks get longer still. The horses with the longest of the long necks survive and breed until after hundreds of thousands of years what we would call a giraffe is roaming freely. This would not mean that all horses everywhere no longer exist.
The mayor explained that what she meant was that Michelle is awkward in formal settings, ungainly, and gouache. And that she has many distinctly unfeminine characteristics. All of which is true. But once anyone uses the word 'ape' or 'monkey' in reference to a Black person, an automatic explosion is sure to follow. Liberals and Black people are hypersensitive to this description. It is not something that anyone is 'allowed' to say in public. In America, Black people can be called dogs, pigs, peacocks, anything at all. But once you use the word ape or monkey, you can be sure the fascistic Liberals will immediately have you in front of a firing squad. That is one of their biggest Fehltritte.
