Bret Baier: FBI Sources Believe Clinton Foundation Case Moving Towards "Likely an Indictment"

[mystery-ak]

Bret Baier: FBI Sources Believe Clinton Foundation Case Moving Towards "Likely an Indictment"

Posted By Tim Hains
On Date November 2, 2016

Fox News Channel's Bret Baier reports the latest news about the Clinton Foundation investigation from two sources inside the FBI. He reveals five important new pieces of information in these two short clips:

1. The Clinton Foundation investigation is far more expansive than anybody has reported so far and has been going on for more than a year.

2. The laptops of Clinton aides Cherryl Mills and Heather Samuelson have not been destroyed, and agents are currently combing through them. The investigation has interviewed several people twice, and plans to interview some for a third time.

3. Agents have found emails believed to have originated on Hillary Clinton's secret server on Anthony Weiner's laptop. They say the emails are not duplicates and could potentially be classified in nature.

4. Sources within the FBI have told him that an indictment is "likely" in the case of pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation, "barring some obstruction in some way" from the Justice Department.

5. FBI sources say with 99% accuracy that Hillary Clinton's server has been hacked by at least five foreign intelligence agencies, and that information had been taken from it.

more
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/02/fbi_sources_tell_fox_news_indictment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html

[TomSea]

Myst, is there any truth that Comey may make an announcement on this Friday?

[sinkspur]

Baer did not say that.

[sinkspur]

Myst, is there any truth that Comey may make an announcement on this Friday?

No.

[mystery-ak]

Myst, is there any truth that Comey may make an announcement on this Friday?

I don't know...I haven't heard that...

[Right_in_Virginia]

Baer did not say that.

Well, if that's the case, post a link to his words.

[edpc]

Baer did not say that.

Actually, he did. You can find the video from his appearance on Brit Hume's show.

[Right_in_Virginia]

No.

And you know this how?

[Oceander]

Of course there will be some indictments - of lower level people.  There will be no indictments of anyone whose surname is "Clinton".  There will most likely be an indictment of Huma Abedin for exposing classified material to someone without a security clearance - her hubby - but again, no indictment of someone whose surname is "Clinton."

[sinkspur]

The FBI doesn't indict.  The DOJ indicts.

[Frank Cannon]

The FBI doesn't indict.  The DOJ indicts.

Where does it say the FBI is going to indict Deacon?

[Bigun]

Of course there will be some indictments - of lower level people.  There will be no indictments of anyone whose surname is "Clinton".  There will most likely be an indictment of Huma Abedin for exposing classified material to someone without a security clearance - her hubby - but again, no indictment of someone whose surname is "Clinton."

I agree entirely!

[HAPPY2BME]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pr7MSM4MZuQ

[HAPPY2BME]

Bret Baier: FBI Sources Believe Clinton Foundation Case Moving Towards "Likely an Indictment"

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/02/fbi_sources_tell_fox_news_indictment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=newrightmedia

[DCPatriot]

Isn't an "indictment", the minimal required before a President can pardon?

[Lando Lincoln]

I didn't hear it in the video but it is in the transcript. Both are here:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/02/fbi_sources_tell_fox_news_indictment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html

Good grief... the transcript is included in the article.

[Lando Lincoln]

I agree entirely!

You guys may be right.  Probably right.  Most likely right.

But this one feels different to me. 

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/02/fbi_sources_tell_fox_news_indictment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html

[Bigun]

You guys may be right.  Probably right.  Most likely right.

But this one feels different to me. 

If anyone named Clinton get's indicted you will probably need to come and help resuscitate me!

[INVAR]

I guess most folks continue to deceive themselves about the fact that the entire Federal Leviathan is wholly, totally and completely corrupt and a law unto only itself.

Anyone expecting actual 'justice' for crimes, treason and misdemeanors of the ringleaders of this cabal is in serious ignorance of where we have arrived.

The entire structure that supports the Beast now ruling us would unravel if the key nodes of corruption were actually held to account.

So they won't be - but you will be treated to some more kabuki theater to placate you.

[Oceander]

Isn't an "indictment", the minimal required before a President can pardon?

No.  Nixon was never indicted. 

[HonestJohn]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/02/fbi_sources_tell_fox_news_indictment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html

Considering the FBI does not issue indictments...

...this is bull.

But this is grist for the gullible.

[corbe]

[HonestJohn]

Who'd be asking?  That's the Justice Department.

You expect Attorney General Lynch to go before a Grand Jury and ask for this?

 

And if Hillary wins, it'd be her choice of an Attorney General.

[Cripplecreek]

You can indict a ham sammich.