I thought Megyn was unbearable..
Seriously? I thought she was excellent, although the ending when she referred to his anger indicated that he had gotten under her skin. Apart from that, I thought he was exhibiting behavior of a desperate, angry man who finally realizes that he has backed the wrong horse for the past year and that the fruits of his labor are just about to reveal themselves as a colossal crop failure.
If you can prove to me that Megyn wouldn't cover Hillary in the same way for the same type of offense, then I'll retract my defense of her. I think Megyn's one of the best FNC has on its lineup because she's equally tough on both sides.
And to the posters who insist that Megyn's a Hillary supporter, I can't see it. Frankly, I couldn't tell you who her candidate is because I've seen her defend Trump when he didn't deserve defending and Hillary when she didn't deserve it. It's called journalism. As for me, I like it to be tough and thorough. I like what appears to be inconsistencies to be pointed out. I like what looks like hypocrisy pointed out. Then
I will assess if the interviewee is truthful, deflecting, spinning, full of BS or any one of a number of other possibilities. I hate when journalists try to lead me to a conclusion. I love it when they pull out the facts (and, in so doing, expose the behavior) I will use to come to my own conclusion. I'm funny that way. I don't even care who her candidate is so long as she is fair in her interviews.
