Author Topic: Clinton staff debated how much ‘outrage’ to show lawmakers over Benghazi, emails show  (Read 487 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,215
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
 By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times - Monday, October 10, 2016

As Hillary Clinton prepared to testify to the House Select Committee on Benghazi in October 2015, her communications and legal teams debated how much “outrage” she should display for lawmakers in her opening statement.

In emails published by Wikileaks Monday, a draft of Mrs. Clinton’s opening remarks to the committee included a line from her book “Hard Choices” in 2014: “I will not be a part of a political slugfest on the backs of dead Americans.”

Clinton campaign adviser Mandy Grunwald liked that line because, she said, “we need a bit of moral outrage.”

But campaign official Jennifer Palmieri balked at the line, saying “I think that is too graphic and splashes back on her as appearing to exploit their deaths,” referring to the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

Mrs. Clinton didn’t use the line in her opening statement.

The draft also included this line about Mr. Stevens: “Chris did not believe retreat was an option — and neither do I.”

more
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/10/clinton-camp-debated-show-outrage-benghazi-hearing/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34