Author Topic: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....  (Read 43930 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 56,695
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #75 on: September 02, 2016, 05:04:43 pm »
Nice try, but that's wearing very, very thin.
Tough titty. It is still the case.

I'm voting for Castle. At least that party can spell Constitution, and knows how many articles there are in it.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis

Offline Idaho_Cowboy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,924
  • Gender: Male
  • Ride for the Brand - Joshua 24:15
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #76 on: September 02, 2016, 05:13:15 pm »
I'd just like to say, for the record: Trump is asking 'we the people' for a job as president. He is asking to work for us, not the other way around and we are not beholden to support him in the job simply because he asks. He should stand or fall on his own merits.
“The way I see it, every time a man gets up in the morning he starts his life over. Sure, the bills are there to pay, and the job is there to do, but you don't have to stay in a pattern. You can always start over, saddle a fresh horse and take another trail.” ― Louis L'Amour

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 56,695
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #77 on: September 02, 2016, 05:15:18 pm »
Oh, I’ve heard the “there’s other people to vote for”…..yeah, let’s go with that.  How well has that worked out….ever?

So, how about this idea?  We (conservatives) start working on knocking down the other side first, then we can go out back and beat the tar out of each other.

Well, it hasn't if you don't count the demise of the Whigs, the Bullmoose Party and other anomalies. But it darned sure won't if people won't vote their conscience because they have to vote for the loser who will 'win'. What have we gained by that except an inexorable slide toward totalitarianism--from both sides of the aisle.

We aren't going to stop that slide away from a Constitutional Republic by hitting the R button and praying that maybe this time, maybe just this once (or second time if you got to vote for Reagan), it'll mean we don't continue hurtling down the Socialist road.

Your vote is your own, and you certainly may cast it as you please, but I can't vote my conscience and vote for a lesser evil if I know there is someone out there who is better, with  a better platform who espouses the Constitution. Why would I vote for something I don't want over something I do?

That would be silly. The bottom line is that by failing to vote for better, we will continue to get worse. That doesn't mean we're going to jump right in with a "third" party (out of some 70+ parties out there) and grab 270 electoral votes right away. Pretty unlikely unless there is some serious incident at the last minute. But it does mean that that party (Constitution Party) will gain a little on the big boys and grow. I'm looking down the road, not today, probably not tomorrow, but if you want the Republic back, voting for a little shinier version of the status quo isn't going to get it.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis

Offline Restored

  • TBR Advisory Committee
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,659
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #78 on: September 02, 2016, 05:19:44 pm »
Trump is the candidate that the RINO's always wanted. Bipartisan, moderate-to-liberal, friend of Democrats, New York politician, never voted to the Right on extreme social issues like abortion.
Countdown to Resignation

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,986
  • Gender: Female
  • Ex-member
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #79 on: September 02, 2016, 05:36:13 pm »
Though I voted for Cruz, it is the Mark Levin crowd that seems to want to put him on a pedestal.

Accusing John Kasich of receiving Soros funds, Ted Cruz campaign and they apologized for it, saying Marco Rubio said the Bible had no answers; Cruz campaign again.  Some rather awful stuff though, they seem to believe they are without sin either. The list goes on.

Walker and other governors have noteworthy accomplishments that actually show responsibility, it be Senator Rand Paul or others, they are good men but still may be a bit short on concrete results.

Tom, you keep repeating the same disproven slanders.  Come up with something new...or accurate.

Offline bolobaby

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,373
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #80 on: September 02, 2016, 05:39:29 pm »
You voted for Cruz? Yeah, right.
How to lose credibility while posting:
1. Trump is never wrong.
2. Default to the most puerile emoticon you can find. This is especially useful when you can't win an argument on merits.
3. Be falsely ingratiating, completely but politely dismissive without talking to the points, and bring up Hillary whenever the conversation is really about conservatism.
4. When all else fails, remember rule #1 and #2. Emoticons are like the poor man's tweet!

Offline mirvin

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #81 on: September 02, 2016, 05:42:45 pm »
<But it does mean that that party (Constitution Party) will gain a little on the big boys and grow>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_third_party_performances_in_United_States_presidential_elections
 
Year                                     Electoral votes
1832          11/286
                7/286
1848         0/290
1852         0/290
1856         8/296
1860         72/303
                39/303
1892         22/444
1912         88/531
                0/531
1924         13/531
1948         39/531
1968         46/538
1980         0/538
1992         0/538
1996         0/538

As for Libertarians: If you add up all of the electoral votes from 1972, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, 00, 04, 08, and 12, you have a total of 1.

Although I’m being a little flippant here, you have to see the problem.
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.” ― Samuel Adams

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 56,695
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #82 on: September 02, 2016, 06:19:33 pm »
<But it does mean that that party (Constitution Party) will gain a little on the big boys and grow>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_third_party_performances_in_United_States_presidential_elections
 
Year                                     Electoral votes
1832          11/286
                7/286
1848         0/290
1852         0/290
1856         8/296
1860         72/303
                39/303
1892         22/444
1912         88/531
                0/531
1924         13/531
1948         39/531
1968         46/538
1980         0/538
1992         0/538
1996         0/538

As for Libertarians: If you add up all of the electoral votes from 1972, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, 00, 04, 08, and 12, you have a total of 1.

Although I’m being a little flippant here, you have to see the problem.
Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Try doing that with the Republican Party or the Whigs, now.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis

Wingnut

  • Guest
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #83 on: September 02, 2016, 06:35:33 pm »
OP, you managed to bring out the mean girls en masse.  This thread is just one big "You are ignoring this user." for me.  It figures since I agree with everything you said.

Good post.

We must have the same Ignore Line-up. :beer:

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,986
  • Gender: Female
  • Ex-member
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #84 on: September 02, 2016, 06:52:33 pm »
OP, you managed to bring out the mean girls en masse.  This thread is just one big "You are ignoring this user." for me.  It figures since I agree with everything you said.

Good post.

Wait - you have me on ignore? 

Offline Chasaway

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 105
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #85 on: September 02, 2016, 07:01:10 pm »
What are you fighting for @Chasaway?

@Right_in_Virginia , I'm not so much fighting FOR something as I'm here expecting ("looking for") a fight; not FOR something but with "WHO". And frankly, it's "Who"s that I shouldn't have to fight with. Somehow, that's the way it's been turning out.

I think the OP stands on its own, but for a little clarification:

We may agree on some of Trump's statements or on a stated position of his, either completely or in theory. But (speaking for myself and I expect, a few others), we don't know what to think of the man. We don't know if his word is good. We don't see how he can pull it off without us sacrificing even more liberty. We don't see how he can pull it off without working through Congress or going extra-Constitution. And we want to discuss those things.

We want to ask questions and we want to be able to offer criticisms with/to other conservatives and have a profitable, constructive dialog about them. And it's not like I'm suggesting some wild and crazy, fringe-y, tin-foil-hat-wearing topics. Just a civil discussion, even if it contains tough questions and answers and/or criticisms and responses.

However, my personal experience is that when I do that, I'm attacked, excoriated, accused of all kinds of plots/intents/thoughts that I don't hold, called a "newbie"...and have even been described as a supporter of Hillary. None of that has any bearing on the topic, but it must serve SOME purpose to those who employ it.

And they're "conservatives", no less. Some on this site and TOS and throughout internet-dom who claim the conservative label and are Trump supporters.

And I don't get my desired discussion. On this thread alone, I think you'll see exactly what I'm describing. I don't know every person's allegiances, but I haven't seen a known Trump supporter telling me that they agreed with me and that we really SHOULD be able to do that without the rancor and acrimony.

And I wonder why it seems to be always thus.

So, I hate to say it, but I wrote the OP "...looking for (expecting) a fight..." and whoops! Up jumped the devil!

What do you know about that?



"That's all I can stands; I can't stands n' more!"

Offline Rivergirl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,036
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #86 on: September 02, 2016, 07:05:57 pm »
We know sanctimony and arrogant, and oh yes, ignorance and it AINT TED CRUZ.

Offline Chasaway

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 105
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #87 on: September 02, 2016, 07:09:48 pm »
@Chasaway

And another one.....'crying' because Teddy got his azz kicked?     :shrug:\

"Crying" because the less than half-dozen Trump supporters here are so, what?   MEAN??   

"Crying" because the joint isn't more than an echo-chamber in the vein of TOS?

 8888crybaby


"You'd better put some ice on that....."

"Crying"?

What are you talking about, precisely? I didn't do any crying. I ascribed misdirection and distraction from the real topics to folks like you, as opposed to chatting about the topic/question presented.

Oh! And look at you!

A poster-child is discovered.
"That's all I can stands; I can't stands n' more!"

Offline Chasaway

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 105
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #88 on: September 02, 2016, 07:14:55 pm »
I figured you were trying to setup your ignore list and made the post to quickly and easily get the names to add.  I thought you to be quite brilliant.   888bravo

Oh. I didn't think of that.

Could you think of me as brilliant, anyway?
"That's all I can stands; I can't stands n' more!"

Offline TomSea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40,432
  • Gender: Male
  • All deserve a trial if accused
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #89 on: September 02, 2016, 07:56:47 pm »
At least 60-75% of the Never Trumpers are rather nasty towards Trump, putting it in their avatars and signatures,

I don't see that from the pro-Trump folks nor reeling off personal attacks, or outright lying and accusing others of being pro-Trump.

And many are respectful.

A lot of us are just for the nominee as in 2012, we were for the nominee Romney.

With all of these people one can find problems with, Reagan signed a bill when as Governor of California legislating abortions, who knows if supporting the Mujahadeen against the USSR led to the rise of Jihadism. Yes, I know, some say no; but it is a matter for research.

Offline Chasaway

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 105
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #90 on: September 02, 2016, 08:06:17 pm »
At least 60-75% of the Never Trumpers are rather nasty towards Trump, putting it in their avatars and signatures

Might that be because many pro-Trump people are so damned awful to anyone who has questions/criticisms? Might it be that this is one way they can get their thoughts out?

Or no?

I'm sorry, but if you deny the way folks who aren't all in for Trump are treated on TOS and even here at times, your filter's broken.

Quote
A lot of us are just for the nominee as in 2012, we were for the nominee Romney.

And some of us aren't. Is it just as okay for those who aren't as it is for those who are? I mean if you're "just for the nominee" and others are working for something they think might be better?

Maybe?

"That's all I can stands; I can't stands n' more!"

Offline Chasaway

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 105
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #91 on: September 02, 2016, 08:09:06 pm »
At least 60-75% of the Never Trumpers are rather nasty towards Trump, putting it in their avatars and signatures

And BTW...can you show your work on your math, here?

It's just a bald statement borne from your anecdotal experience, unless you can show it to be true.
"That's all I can stands; I can't stands n' more!"

Offline katzenjammer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,512
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #92 on: September 02, 2016, 08:14:42 pm »
@Right_in_Virginia , I'm not so much fighting FOR something as I'm here expecting ("looking for") a fight; not FOR something but with "WHO". And frankly, it's "Who"s that I shouldn't have to fight with. Somehow, that's the way it's been turning out.

I think the OP stands on its own, but for a little clarification:

We may agree on some of Trump's statements or on a stated position of his, either completely or in theory. But (speaking for myself and I expect, a few others), we don't know what to think of the man. We don't know if his word is good. We don't see how he can pull it off without us sacrificing even more liberty. We don't see how he can pull it off without working through Congress or going extra-Constitution. And we want to discuss those things.

We want to ask questions and we want to be able to offer criticisms with/to other conservatives and have a profitable, constructive dialog about them. And it's not like I'm suggesting some wild and crazy, fringe-y, tin-foil-hat-wearing topics. Just a civil discussion, even if it contains tough questions and answers and/or criticisms and responses.

However, my personal experience is that when I do that, I'm attacked, excoriated, accused of all kinds of plots/intents/thoughts that I don't hold, called a "newbie"...and have even been described as a supporter of Hillary. None of that has any bearing on the topic, but it must serve SOME purpose to those who employ it.

And they're "conservatives", no less. Some on this site and TOS and throughout internet-dom who claim the conservative label and are Trump supporters.

And I don't get my desired discussion. On this thread alone, I think you'll see exactly what I'm describing. I don't know every person's allegiances, but I haven't seen a known Trump supporter telling me that they agreed with me and that we really SHOULD be able to do that without the rancor and acrimony.

And I wonder why it seems to be always thus.

So, I hate to say it, but I wrote the OP "...looking for (expecting) a fight..." and whoops! Up jumped the devil!

What do you know about that?

Mr./Ms. Chasaway,

My first question to you (as a surrogate to many others) is: "Why?"

Why do you want to 'fight' with people on the public Internet about your choices for the 11/8 Presidential Election?

You seem to be a reasonably sharp guy/gal, do you really care one iota what people on the public Internet think about your choice?

It would be my guess that at this point in time, you probably have a good idea as to how you will vote.  (And the reasoning in hand, behind your choice.)

Correct me if I am wrong, but you appear to be troubled by the discourse on this forum regarding the Republican nominee.  My humble suggestion is that you get on the right side of the problem, rather than lament your current position.

There is a sub-forum that is named: " On The Campaign Trail! (PRO TRUMP ONLY)."  It is my opinion that the parenthetical qualifier is misnamed.  It should be something like: "(Supporting the GOP Nominees)" or left off completely.  In the past, after the primaries and convention ended, the GOP Briefing Room set aside the disappointments and rallied around the GOP Nominees (as difficult as it was for some to stomach at the time).

There is a destructive notion that is often paraded throughout this forum, and that is: "only Trump supporters can post in that area."  And it has a correlate, Trump supporters should not post elsewhere.  See this post as an example:

http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,222982.msg1037707.html#msg1037707

Quote
Why are some of you people on the free speech Trump Arizona speech thread accosting posters on that thread?  We don't need your aggravation.  Stay here where you wanted to be by yourselves.  Geesh!  You are irritating and have little to say except post nasty little posts, especially RIV.  Now, RIV,  moderator in chief of this only Trump section, wipe my post off as the little person you are.
@mystery-ak
« Last Edit: August 31, 2016, 11:56:15 PM by Victoria33 »

@mystery-ak will surely correct me if I am wrong, but it is my understanding that:

1.  EVERYONE is welcome and encouraged to post in the "Trump area" (http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/board,120.0.html).  Especially in the Rally threads where the GOP team of Trump and Pence are barnstorming the country, speaking out for the positions and policies that 95+% of the members of this forum have been clamoring for, for many years.  I will speak out of turn for the Moderator of this forum, but I believe my statements are in line with her desires:

A.  Constructive Criticism of our Nominees is welcome.  Points made, with respect to how they may better frame the message, or even when they may fail on a point, are more than welcome.  Mssrs. Trump and Pence are human beings, they DON'T get everything right (at least in terms of how we see it). 
B.  Honest Questions about their policy positions and/or public statements are more than welcome.  Presidential politics is a VERY convoluted game.  Factor in a one-sided media and chaos results, much akin to what we are seeing now.  Are you confused about what Mr. Trump or Mr. Pence may have said?  Ask away.... ask for context... ask for backup information.... ask for the actual statement underlying the media spin...

Again, speaking out of school for our intrepid moderator, Right_in_Virgina, what is not welcome in that sub-forum (yes, the one that traditionally was used to follow our chosen Nominees on the general election campaign trail) is:
- gratuitous insults aimed at our Nominees and/or their supporters,
- ludicrous accusations of misintent and outright LIES,
- inane graphics or commentary that reduce the quality of the forum to a sink hole.

Come into the threads....  state your genuine concerns and questions....  state your honest objections.... be respectful (not only to our Nominees and their supporters, but more importantly, to this forum and yourself.).

2.  Every member of this forum is welcome and encouraged to post in each and every sub-forum, as long as they abide by the rules of the forum (explicitly stated and otherwise understood).


There is no reason to look for a 'fight' of any sort at this point in time.  The primary contests are over, the GOP Convention has come and gone.  Yes, there are numerous 3rd parties candidates available in many states that one can choose over the two main candidates.  If that is your desire, full steam ahead to you, vote your conscience and may you rest easily with your choice.  But if you may be one that accepts the situational facts of the matter, that being that either Mr. Trump or Ms. Clinton will become the 45th POTUS on January 20, 2017, then join aboard....  let us all know your deeply held misgivings....  rant until your heart's content about the weakness of the chosen GOP standard bearers, but if GOD be your judge, do not permit within your personal abilities, the demon of HRC to ascend to the prominence of POTUS.  Be HONEST in your questions and concerns, fall not victim to the media's faux angst and anguish with respect to the "purity" of the GOP team.

A side remark to another: @skeeter -- you are obviously SMART enough to not allow the statements of anonymous others on the public Internet to sway your choices, vote YOUR conscience and disregard the chaff that billows about.

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,986
  • Gender: Female
  • Ex-member
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #93 on: September 02, 2016, 08:17:56 pm »
Of course not, silly.  There were some other good posts scattered here and three amongst the sea.  :P

Just making sure!

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,794
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #94 on: September 02, 2016, 08:22:36 pm »
Mmmm hmmm. Whatever you say.

Clever.   :whistle:

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,794
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #95 on: September 02, 2016, 08:24:38 pm »
Tough titty. It is still the case.

I'm voting for Castle. At least that party can spell Constitution, and knows how many articles there are in it.

For the love of the Constitution @Smokin Joe.....why are you proud to put its future in Hillary's hands?

Offline Idaho_Cowboy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,924
  • Gender: Male
  • Ride for the Brand - Joshua 24:15
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #96 on: September 02, 2016, 08:27:34 pm »
Mr./Ms. Chasaway,

My first question to you (as a surrogate to many others) is: "Why?"

Why do you want to 'fight' with people on the public Internet about your choices for the 11/8 Presidential Election?

You seem to be a reasonably sharp guy/gal, do you really care one iota what people on the public Internet think about your choice?

It would be my guess that at this point in time, you probably have a good idea as to how you will vote.  (And the reasoning in hand, behind your choice.)

Correct me if I am wrong, but you appear to be troubled by the discourse on this forum regarding the Republican nominee.  My humble suggestion is that you get on the right side of the problem, rather than lament your current position.

There is a sub-forum that is named: " On The Campaign Trail! (PRO TRUMP ONLY)."  It is my opinion that the parenthetical qualifier is misnamed.  It should be something like: "(Supporting the GOP Nominees)" or left off completely.  In the past, after the primaries and convention ended, the GOP Briefing Room set aside the disappointments and rallied around the GOP Nominees (as difficult as it was for some to stomach at the time).

There is a destructive notion that is often paraded throughout this forum, and that is: "only Trump supporters can post in that area."  And it has a correlate, Trump supporters should not post elsewhere.  See this post as an example:

http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,222982.msg1037707.html#msg1037707

@mystery-ak will surely correct me if I am wrong, but it is my understanding that:

1.  EVERYONE is welcome and encouraged to post in the "Trump area" (http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/board,120.0.html).  Especially in the Rally threads where the GOP team of Trump and Pence are barnstorming the country, speaking out for the positions and policies that 95+% of the members of this forum have been clamoring for, for many years.  I will speak out of turn for the Moderator of this forum, but I believe my statements are in line with her desires:

A.  Constructive Criticism of our Nominees is welcome.  Points made, with respect to how they may better frame the message, or even when they may fail on a point, are more than welcome.  Mssrs. Trump and Pence are human beings, they DON'T get everything right (at least in terms of how we see it). 
B.  Honest Questions about their policy positions and/or public statements are more than welcome.  Presidential politics is a VERY convoluted game.  Factor in a one-sided media and chaos results, much akin to what we are seeing now.  Are you confused about what Mr. Trump or Mr. Pence may have said?  Ask away.... ask for context... ask for backup information.... ask for the actual statement underlying the media spin...

Again, speaking out of school for our intrepid moderator, Right_in_Virgina, what is not welcome in that sub-forum (yes, the one that traditionally was used to follow our chosen Nominees on the general election campaign trail) is:
- gratuitous insults aimed at our Nominees and/or their supporters,
- ludicrous accusations of misintent and outright LIES,
- inane graphics or commentary that reduce the quality of the forum to a sink hole.

Come into the threads....  state your genuine concerns and questions....  state your honest objections.... be respectful (not only to our Nominees and their supporters, but more importantly, to this forum and yourself.).

2.  Every member of this forum is welcome and encouraged to post in each and every sub-forum, as long as they abide by the rules of the forum (explicitly stated and otherwise understood).




Umm, no. A, B, and 2 are false. You can ask @Right_in_Virginia about that section, but anything that is not glowing praise of Trump. Even the occasional non Trump focused post of discussion with other members is either redacted re-educated or nuked.
“The way I see it, every time a man gets up in the morning he starts his life over. Sure, the bills are there to pay, and the job is there to do, but you don't have to stay in a pattern. You can always start over, saddle a fresh horse and take another trail.” ― Louis L'Amour

Offline Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51,556
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #97 on: September 02, 2016, 08:28:56 pm »

@mystery-ak will surely correct me if I am wrong, but it is my understanding that:

1.  EVERYONE is welcome and encouraged to post in the "Trump area" (http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/board,120.0.html).  Especially in the Rally threads where the GOP team of Trump and Pence are barnstorming the country, speaking out for the positions and policies that 95+% of the members of this forum have been clamoring for, for many years.  I will speak out of turn for the Moderator of this forum, but I believe my statements are in line with her desires:

A.  Constructive Criticism of our Nominees is welcome.  Points made, with respect to how they may better frame the message, or even when they may fail on a point, are more than welcome.  Mssrs. Trump and Pence are human beings, they DON'T get everything right (at least in terms of how we see it). 
B.  Honest Questions about their policy positions and/or public statements are more than welcome.  Presidential politics is a VERY convoluted game.  Factor in a one-sided media and chaos results, much akin to what we are seeing now.  Are you confused about what Mr. Trump or Mr. Pence may have said?  Ask away.... ask for context... ask for backup information.... ask for the actual statement underlying the media spin...

Again, speaking out of school for our intrepid moderator, Right_in_Virgina, what is not welcome in that sub-forum (yes, the one that traditionally was used to follow our chosen Nominees on the general election campaign trail) is:
- gratuitous insults aimed at our Nominees and/or their supporters,
- ludicrous accusations of misintent and outright LIES,
- inane graphics or commentary that reduce the quality of the forum to a sink hole.

Come into the threads....  state your genuine concerns and questions....  state your honest objections.... be respectful (not only to our Nominees and their supporters, but more importantly, to this forum and yourself.).

2.  Every member of this forum is welcome and encouraged to post in each and every sub-forum, as long as they abide by the rules of the forum (explicitly stated and otherwise understood).




I'm sorry to have to inform my GOOD friend that the portion of your post I quoted has been repeatedly proven to be patently untrue!
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,794
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #98 on: September 02, 2016, 08:31:50 pm »
@Right_in_Virginia , I'm not so much fighting FOR something as I'm here expecting ("looking for") a fight; not FOR something but with "WHO". And frankly, it's "Who"s that I shouldn't have to fight with. Somehow, that's the way it's been turning out.

Here is your quote that I responded to with the question what are you fighting for:

So...hope you'll understand this, but I didn't come to PICK a fight, I came TO fight 

How about you figure out what/who you're fighting with/for and then let me know .  You seem to be rather confused.   :whistle:


Offline Chasaway

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 105
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hate to say it, but I came on here looking for a fight....
« Reply #99 on: September 02, 2016, 08:31:58 pm »
Mr./Ms. Chasaway,

My first question to you (as a surrogate to many others) is: "Why?"

Why do you want to 'fight' with people on the public Internet about your choices for the 11/8 Presidential Election?

You seem to be a reasonably sharp guy/gal, do you really care one iota what people on the public Internet think about your choice?

It would be my guess that at this point in time, you probably have a good idea as to how you will vote.  (And the reasoning in hand, behind your choice.)

Correct me if I am wrong, but you appear to be troubled by the discourse on this forum regarding the Republican nominee.  My humble suggestion is that you get on the right side of the problem, rather than lament your current position.

There is a sub-forum that is named: " On The Campaign Trail! (PRO TRUMP ONLY)."  It is my opinion that the parenthetical qualifier is misnamed.  It should be something like: "(Supporting the GOP Nominees)" or left off completely.  In the past, after the primaries and convention ended, the GOP Briefing Room set aside the disappointments and rallied around the GOP Nominees (as difficult as it was for some to stomach at the time).

There is a destructive notion that is often paraded throughout this forum, and that is: "only Trump supporters can post in that area."  And it has a correlate, Trump supporters should not post elsewhere.  See this post as an example:

http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,222982.msg1037707.html#msg1037707

@mystery-ak will surely correct me if I am wrong, but it is my understanding that:

1.  EVERYONE is welcome and encouraged to post in the "Trump area" (http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/board,120.0.html).  Especially in the Rally threads where the GOP team of Trump and Pence are barnstorming the country, speaking out for the positions and policies that 95+% of the members of this forum have been clamoring for, for many years.  I will speak out of turn for the Moderator of this forum, but I believe my statements are in line with her desires:

A.  Constructive Criticism of our Nominees is welcome.  Points made, with respect to how they may better frame the message, or even when they may fail on a point, are more than welcome.  Mssrs. Trump and Pence are human beings, they DON'T get everything right (at least in terms of how we see it). 
B.  Honest Questions about their policy positions and/or public statements are more than welcome.  Presidential politics is a VERY convoluted game.  Factor in a one-sided media and chaos results, much akin to what we are seeing now.  Are you confused about what Mr. Trump or Mr. Pence may have said?  Ask away.... ask for context... ask for backup information.... ask for the actual statement underlying the media spin...

Again, speaking out of school for our intrepid moderator, Right_in_Virgina, what is not welcome in that sub-forum (yes, the one that traditionally was used to follow our chosen Nominees on the general election campaign trail) is:
- gratuitous insults aimed at our Nominees and/or their supporters,
- ludicrous accusations of misintent and outright LIES,
- inane graphics or commentary that reduce the quality of the forum to a sink hole.

Come into the threads....  state your genuine concerns and questions....  state your honest objections.... be respectful (not only to our Nominees and their supporters, but more importantly, to this forum and yourself.).

2.  Every member of this forum is welcome and encouraged to post in each and every sub-forum, as long as they abide by the rules of the forum (explicitly stated and otherwise understood).


There is no reason to look for a 'fight' of any sort at this point in time.  The primary contests are over, the GOP Convention has come and gone.  Yes, there are numerous 3rd parties candidates available in many states that one can choose over the two main candidates.  If that is your desire, full steam ahead to you, vote your conscience and may you rest easily with your choice.  But if you may be one that accepts the situational facts of the matter, that being that either Mr. Trump or Ms. Clinton will become the 45th POTUS on January 20, 2017, then join aboard....  let us all know your deeply held misgivings....  rant until your heart's content about the weakness of the chosen GOP standard bearers, but if GOD be your judge, do not permit within your personal abilities, the demon of HRC to ascend to the prominence of POTUS.  Be HONEST in your questions and concerns, fall not victim to the media's faux angst and anguish with respect to the "purity" of the GOP team.

A side remark to another: @skeeter -- you are obviously SMART enough to not allow the statements of anonymous others on the public Internet to sway your choices, vote YOUR conscience and disregard the chaff that billows about.

It's Mr. Chasaway. And thanks for your sensitivity. And it will be "MISTER" to anyone who wants to reply to me from now on.

JOKING! But I am a guy.

Now, in response to your post:

1. You ask "Why?". My answer to that is, I am required to if I want to ask questions about Trump. Because, I WILL be confronted. And it WON'T be about the substance. And I am no longer going to be distracted by the specious, fatuous things said that are not on point. This is a discussion about the potential commander-in-chief, President of my country. And if I want to ask questions or express criticisms/concerns about said candidate, I'm gonna fight anyone who wishes to attack me/my character/my whatever instead of answering. That tactic is nothing but squid ink. And if they want to play in the field of ideas, they should lose if they possess none.

2. You misunderstand my position. I don't think anyone on here knows who I support/don't support for President (other than a lack of support for Hillary). My fight is for the discussion. I despise those who attempt to bully and bluster their way through a debate/discussion. And I intend to call them on it. You spent a hella lot of words counseling me. You might should spend the same effort trying to understand what I'm saying. I don't care what anyone thinks of my choice(s). I care immensely about the debate.

3. You say,"There is no reason to look for a 'fight' of any sort at this point in time." And I say there is no more important time to be willing to fight.

Once more...I a'int trying to start it, but by gum I intend to finish it.

I will no longer allow attacks directed at me instead of my position. And I will call them out and expect them to be defended.

But, thanks for your counsel.

Whatever you meant.
"That's all I can stands; I can't stands n' more!"