Author Topic: Why Gene Wilder's Willy Wonka Crushed Johnny Depp's Model: Wilder's take on the chocolatier can't be topped.  (Read 834 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SirLinksALot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,417
  • Gender: Male
SOURCE: PJ MEDIA

URL: https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2016/08/30/why-gene-wilders-willy-wonka-crushed-depps-model/

by: Christian Toto



Gene Wilder left behind so many marvelous films.

"Blazing Saddles." "The Producers." "Young Frankenstein." They're all classics, unless you worship at the altar of safe spaces and trigger warnings.

One film still stands above that cinematic trinity: 1971's "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory."

Wilder, who died Monday at the age of 83, delivered the kind of performance you wish the Academy could go back in time to hand him some sort of trophy for.

His wondrous chocolatier is funny, whimsical and more than a little frightening. He's the center of a silly tale of bratty kids and big dreams. He's always got our attention despite the hummable songs and those curious Oompa Loompas. "Pure Imagination" was a joy to listen to, made even more famous later by singer, Lou Rawls.

But one man thought it wasn't good enough.

Director Tim Burton remade the classic tale in 2005 via "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory." This reporter interviewed Burton as part of a press junket prior to the film's production. When asked why he was remaking a classic film, the frizzy-haired auteur fixed me with a penetrating look.

"Have you seen it?" he said with contempt.

The Wonka fan in me stayed silent. It wasn't the setting for a movie debate. And, frankly, I was curious to see what Burton could bring to the story. Burton remains a master visualist. What could he uncork with a Wonka reboot?

Burton's film ended up sticking more closely to Roald Dahl's source material. It snared Johnny Depp in the signature role. Could you select a better star to give Wilder a run for his money?

Burton's "Chocolate Factory" brimmed with beautiful scenery and a terrific score from Danny Elfman. There's nothing particularly wrong with the film ... save Depp.

He's creepy. Offputting. He lacks the sinister element Wilder brought to the character, and the unending charisma. Critics compared him to Michael Jackson, and hardly in a flattering way.

Our best chameleon took a swing at Wilder's Wonka legacy ... and missed.

"Charlie" can still be found on home video, pay cable outlets and elsewhere. Your kids will enjoy it, and you might consider picking up the soundtrack, too.

It won't displace Wilder's "Wonka," though. That will keep on playing on every outlet imaginable. You'll see it years from now at outdoor summer festivals. That's where pop culture treasures are played over and again.

Wilder ensured that with his bravura turn. We all have that Golden Ticket, and few of us are willing to let it go.

« Last Edit: August 31, 2016, 03:26:05 pm by SirLinksALot »

Offline jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,363
  • Gender: Male
  • Realistic nihilist
    • Fullervision
Quote
He's creepy. Offputting. He lacks the sinister element Wilder brought to the character, and the unending charisma. Critics compared him to Michael Jackson, and hardly in a flattering way.
Perhaps that was Burton's aim.

Note that the later film put much more of a backstory on the character: he was damaged because of his childhood, much like Jackson himself—so that version of Wonka was consistent with the trauma of his upbringing. That was absent from the first film, which went for the quick "happy ending;" that strategy left the character much more of an enigma, which gave Wilder a lot more room to be eccentric. You simply did not know where he was coming from, whereas with Depp's Wonka, the ending explained all of it.
New profile picture in honor of Public Domain Day 2024