Author Topic: Donald Trump: Nuclear deal calls for US to defend Iran against Israeli attack  (Read 728 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Donald Trump: Nuclear deal calls for US to defend Iran against Israeli attack
By JPOST.COM STAFF
09/03/2015    

"If Israel attacks Iran according to that deal, I believe... that we have to fight with Iran against Israel," Republican presidential candidate tells CNN.
In a telephone interview with CNN Tuesday, Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump said that under the auspices of the Iran nuclear agreement, if Israel were to attack the Islamic Republic, the United States would have to come to the Tehran's aid.

Trump has vocally opposed the deal since announcing his run for president, saying that the United States "should have doubled up the sanctions for another couple of months" and that the 24-day notice Iran receives before sites can be inspected is unacceptable.

But Trump added an unconventional twist to the opposition argument, suggesting that under the terms of the deal the United States was required to fight alongside Iran if Israel were to attack.

"You know, there is something in the Iran deal that people I don't think really understand or know about," the real estate mogul said. "And nobody is ever to explain it that if somebody attacks Iran, we have to come to their defense."

Trump added, "And I'm saying this - that includes Israel? And most people say, yes. So, if Israel attacks Iran according to that deal, I believe... that we have to fight with Iran against Israel."

In one of its annexes, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action calls for cooperation by Western powers with Iran on nuclear safety "as appropriate." Such cooperation may include training and workshops for Iran to ward against sabotage of its declared, legal civilian nuclear facilities.

Nowhere in the agreement, however, is the United States or any other party required to come to the defense of Iran should the country be attacked.

On Wednesday, the Obama administration secured the support of 34 senators for its landmark nuclear agreement with Iran, ensuring its safe passage through a vote scheduled in Congress this month.

Senator Barbara Mikulski, Democrat from Maryland, announced her support for the deal on Wednesday morning. She followed announcements from two Democratic colleagues, senators Chris Coons of Delaware and Bob Casey, Jr. from Pennsylvania, the previous day.
 
Congress may still vote and pass a resolution disapproving of the deal when it reconvenes next week.

Michael Wilner contributed to this report.

http://www.jpost.com/landedpages/printarticle.aspx?id=415079
« Last Edit: September 03, 2015, 06:04:28 pm by rangerrebew »

bkepley

  • Guest
Nowhere in the agreement, however, is the United States or any other party required to come to the defense of Iran should the country be attacked.

The guy just spouts out stuff without regard to facts.  He's just like a third-world demagogue.

Offline flowers

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,798
Nowhere in the agreement, however, is the United States or any other party required to come to the defense of Iran should the country be attacked.

The guy just spouts out stuff without regard to facts.  He's just like a third-world demagogue.
Nope he is correct. Part of the deal helps Iran, we will teach them how to defend themselves against attacks at nuke sites.


Offline flowers

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,798
Nowhere in the agreement, however, is the United States or any other party required to come to the defense of Iran should the country be attacked.

The guy just spouts out stuff without regard to facts.  He's just like a third-world demagogue.
We also will send people to help them upgrade their military jets, advisers.


bkepley

  • Guest
We also will send people to help them upgrade their military jets, advisers.

So, if Israel attacks Iran according to that deal, I believe... that we have to fight with Iran against Israel."

Offline flowers

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,798
So, if Israel attacks Iran according to that deal, I believe... that we have to fight with Iran against Israel."
Well if we are helping them defend themselves then it might happen. You know obie would tell our military to fire on Israeli jets. No I haven't seen that exact language. I have no doubts that obie would make us help Iran.


bkepley

  • Guest
Well if we are helping them defend themselves then it might happen. You know obie would tell our military to fire on Israeli jets. No I haven't seen that exact language. I have no doubts that obie would make us help Iran.

The point is that Trump shoots off his mouth without consideration of the true facts.  The agreement does not say we must fight with Iran if Iran is attacked.  It's incredibly unprofessional.

Godzilla

  • Guest
Nope he is correct. Part of the deal helps Iran, we will teach them how to defend themselves against attacks at nuke sites.

This is very useful for Israel. 

In order to 'help' the Iranians, US advisors must learn the current state of Iranian defenses as a baseline for improvement.  We can funnel that knowledge to Israel, making it easier for them to circumvent Iranian defenses.

Furthermore, if we show the Iranians how to encrypt their comms, we can pass the encryption codes and tech over as well.

And we can build in backdoors and critical failure points for future exploitation.

We did something similar to the Soviet Union, 'allowing' the Soviets to steal Canadian oil pipeline control software.  And after it was installed, we accessed it and mucked around, causing an enormous explosion crippling their ability to ship oil.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1455559/CIA-plot-led-to-huge-blast-in-Siberian-gas-pipeline.html
« Last Edit: September 04, 2015, 08:58:19 pm by Godzilla »