Author Topic: Senate approves Obama trade bill, sending fast-track to House  (Read 2064 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,204
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/243009-senate-advances-fast-track-for-obama-setting-up-final-vote

 By Alexander Bolton - 05/22/15 07:43 PM EDT

The Senate voted Friday to approve a trade package granting President Obama fast-track negotiating authority, giving him a major second-term legislative victory.

It’s also a big win for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) who said last month that passing trade legislation would likely be the biggest accomplishment of the 114th Congress.

Passage in the Senate sets up a bruising fight next month in the House, where lawmakers are more populist on both sides of the aisle.

Fast-track, also known as trade promotion authority, empowers Obama and future presidents to negotiate trade deals that cannot be changed by Congress. Those deals can win Senate approval with simple-majority votes instead of having to clear the 60-vote hurdle usually required of controversial legislation.

The legislation grants expedited review of trade agreements for up to six years.

It paves the way for swift passage of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the largest trade deal since the North American Free Trade Agreement, which the administration is negotiating with 11 other countries.

Once the Senate votes on final passage, Obama’s trade agenda heads to the House where it faces a steeper climb.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who led the opposition of liberal Democrats in the upper chamber, has already met Democratic House allies such as Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Mass.) to build a roadblock.

Fast-track has moved in fits and starts over the past two weeks as Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and other pro-labor Democrats devised various obstacles to slow its momentum.

Their goal was to delay Senate passage until after the Memorial Day recess to give outside labor, environmental and liberal advocacy groups more time to wage a grassroots campaign to turn public opinion.

McConnell made clear from the start of the debate that he did want that to happen. He used the looming expiration of Section 215 of the Patriot Act and the Highway Trust Fund as a backstop to ensure Senate action by stacking votes to extend both programs after the trade bill.

The debate laid bare the stark differences within the Democratic Party over free trade.

Shortly before the vote, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the main Democratic co-author of fast-track, said the legislation would set a higher standard for trade deals.

“At the end of the day, colleagues, we’ve always known that one of the paths to more good-paying jobs in our country is exports,” he said.

But his home-state colleague, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) panned it for failing to include adequate wage safeguards.

“What we’ve seen in the wake of NAFTA and the free trade agreements that have followed is not only a tremendous loss of jobs but a tremendous increase in inequality in this nation,” he said.

The bills managers, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Wyden, the senior Democrat on the Finance panel, beat back several amendments that could have jeopardized its chances in the House or drawn a presidential veto.

The toughest vote came on an amendment sponsored by Sens. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) to require that future trade agreements include enforceable provisions to dissuade currency manipulation by foreign partners. It failed by 48 to 51.

Instead, the Senate adopted an alternative authored by Hatch and Wyden. It directs the administration to hold trading partners accountable for currency manipulation and to use various tools such as reporting, monitoring and cooperative mechanisms.

Portman criticized it for lacking “teeth.”

Obama and McConnell teamed up to defeat the Portman-Stabenow proposal. Senators and aides said Obama worked the phone to pry support away from the amendment. McConnell told reporters at the start of the week he would whip against it and any other amendments he claimed would “tank the bill.”

Sen. John Tester (Mont.), the chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, said he received a call from Treasury Secretary Jack Lew Thursday night urging him to oppose Portman-Stabenow.

Ziad Ojakli, vice president of government relations at Ford, which strongly supported the currency provision, vowed “to work with lawmakers to address this critical issue as TPA moves through the legislative process.”

Hatch, Wyden and McConnell also defeated an amendment sponsored by Warren that would bar corporations from using neutral arbitration process to settle disputes with foreign governments. Warren argued the so-called Investor State Dispute Settlement process would unfairly shield corporations from local laws.

“A provision to give corporations special rights to challenge our laws outside of our legal system should not be part of our free trade agreement,” she said before the vote.

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), another leader of the Democratic caucus’s “fair-trade” wing, lost a vote on his amendment to require prior congressional approval of negotiations to expand the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

“Before President Obama or President Hillary Clinton or President Lindsey Graham decides that China should be admitted to the Trans-Pacific Partnership, this amendment assures Congress plays a role,” he said.

The trade package nearly derailed on Thursday because of a dispute over whether to link it to reauthorization of the Export-Import Bank, a top priority of two key pro-trade Democrats, Sens. Patty Murray (Wash.) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.).

Cantwell initially demanded that McConnell guarantee Senate and House passage of legislation reauthorizing the bank in exchange for her support of fast-track.

At one point during a pivotal vote Thursday to end debate on the Hatch-Wyden substitute amendment, which contained the meat of the trade package, McConnell appeared in trouble after five Republicans defected.

He swung Murray and Cantwell, and several other pro-trade Democrats as well as Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to yes by promising them a vote next month on an amendment reauthorizing the bank. Its charter expires on June 30.

This story was updated at 8:57 p.m.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,204
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Senate approves Obama trade bill, sending fast-track to House
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2015, 01:34:48 am »
Or as Drudge says.."SENATE REPUBLICANS GIVE OBAMA NEW POWERS"
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Formerly Once-Ler

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 0
Re: Senate approves Obama trade bill, sending fast-track to House
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2015, 02:11:20 am »
We don't need rat votes to pass stuff in the House.

Offline Formerly Once-Ler

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 0
Re: Senate approves Obama trade bill, sending fast-track to House
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2015, 04:35:26 am »
http://blogs.rollcall.com/wgdb/senate-passes-trade-promotion-authority/


Five Republicans voted no: Susan Collins of Maine, Mike Lee of Utah, Rand Paul of Kentucky, Jeff Sessions of Alabama and Richard C. Shelby of Alabama.

One Republican senator did not vote: Michael B. Enzi of Wyoming.

Offline Paladin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,476
  • Gender: Male
Re: Senate approves Obama trade bill, sending fast-track to House
« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2015, 04:44:42 am »
Quote
Or as Drudge says.."SENATE REPUBLICANS GIVE OBAMA NEW POWERS
"

And just below that it says: "DETAILS REMAIN 'CLASSIFIED'"

Thanks, Mitch and company.
Members of the anti-Trump cabal: Now that Mr Trump has sewn up the nomination, I want you to know I feel your pain.

Offline Formerly Once-Ler

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 0
Re: Senate approves Obama trade bill, sending fast-track to House
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2015, 05:11:53 am »
"

And just below that it says: "DETAILS REMAIN 'CLASSIFIED'"

Thanks, Mitch and company.
Mitch and company includes Senators Cruz, Rubio, Corynyn, Cotton, Gardner, Ernst, Sasse, Scott, Toomey, Tillis, and my fantastic Senator Ron Johnson.

Offline Paladin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,476
  • Gender: Male
Re: Senate approves Obama trade bill, sending fast-track to House
« Reply #6 on: May 23, 2015, 05:41:18 am »
A worthy company indeed, Once-Ler, but not infallible. These five (well four of them anyway) I will counter with and they I find far more aligned with my thinking.

Quote
Five Republicans voted no: Susan Collins of Maine, Mike Lee of Utah, Rand Paul of Kentucky, Jeff Sessions of Alabama and Richard C. Shelby of Alabama.

Congress has surrendered enough of its authority already and, even worse, is now doing so again to a man who has shown himself to be indifferent to the law and to the Constitution. Bad move, I'm afraid.
Members of the anti-Trump cabal: Now that Mr Trump has sewn up the nomination, I want you to know I feel your pain.

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,804
  • Gender: Male
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
Re: Senate approves Obama trade bill, sending fast-track to House
« Reply #7 on: May 23, 2015, 05:52:12 am »
Congress has surrendered enough of its authority already and, even worse, is now doing so again to a man who has shown himself to be indifferent to the law and to the Constitution. Bad move, I'm afraid.

Taking it slightly off topic - I would rather they surrendered authority to the malignant man-child buffoon than a President who is a model of honor and probity. Better to do so temporarily to one who is such an obvious mistake as leader that such surrenders will be nullified by the next administration.

There is a good reason Washington rejected most of the powers the founders and grateful populace attempted to thrust on him. With him as the standard, the co-equal branches would be anything but.
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline flowers

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,798
Re: Senate approves Obama trade bill, sending fast-track to House
« Reply #8 on: May 23, 2015, 04:28:04 pm »
Quote
will be nullified by the next administration.
  Nope  won't happen.


Offline Formerly Once-Ler

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 0
Re: Senate approves Obama trade bill, sending fast-track to House
« Reply #9 on: May 23, 2015, 06:23:02 pm »
  Nope  won't happen.
Agreed.  This is something the GOP has wanted, not just for Obama, but for future GOP Presidents who may face a rat Congress.

Offline mrclose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,233
Re: Senate approves Obama trade bill, sending fast-track to House
« Reply #10 on: May 23, 2015, 09:20:47 pm »
"

And just below that it says: "DETAILS REMAIN 'CLASSIFIED'"

Thanks, Mitch and company.

The Bill

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/995/text
"Hell is empty, all the devil's are here!"
~ Self

Offline Paladin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,476
  • Gender: Male
Re: Senate approves Obama trade bill, sending fast-track to House
« Reply #11 on: May 24, 2015, 03:59:08 am »
I am not quite sure what Bill your post refers to MrClose because it sure isn't the Trans Pacific Partnership which is being treated as a high level security issue. In fact, I would ask its proponents on here why it is being handled so secretively:

Quote
The battle between organized labor, progressive Democrats and President Obama over the Trans Pacific Partnership continued on Thursday when U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Joe Machin filed the Trade Transparency Act, a bill requiring that the public and Congress have at least 60 days to review and debate any trade legislation before being moved to the floor for a vote. The move was intended to highlight the issue many Americans see with continuing to categorize trade negotiations as classified, especially when it effects the personal finances of millions of workers and business owners alike.

Senators are forced to go into a classified viewing room in order to read the full text of the document, but are not allowed to bring in key staff or take notes on what is included in the bill text. Not only this, but as you would assume for classified documents, elected officials are unable to speak to anyone without proper security clearance about the specific details of the trade negotiations without suffering potential criminal legal ramifications. This becomes a serious issue when dealing with complicated and technical negotiations regarding the largest trade deal in American history. It also raises serious questions about the legislative process and democracy generally when the public is unable to view the content of a bill introduced in Congress, but foreign government officials and private corporations are.

S. 1381; the Trade Transparency Bill, was introduced as part of a unanimous consent request, a procedural move intended to limit debate and structure the amendment process depending on the complexity of the circumstances being negotiated and allowing for tailor made agreements traditionally. But even one opposing vote can derail the tactic, and that is exactly what happened when Republican Senator Orrin Hatch of Arizona voted no. In an incredible Orwellian attempt to justify his opposition to government transparency he said "...if senators are concerned about the level of transparency on trade agreements, they should support the current legislation.", referring to TPP itself. Sen. Hatch admitted that he doesn't know exactly what's in the TPP bill, but still decided to kill any effort to bring transparency to the process.

Most Republicans support the trade bill, while a majority of Democrats oppose it.

Later that day the Senate voted 62-38 to end debate on the bill, narrowly gaining the 60 votes needed to proceed. Seen as a victory for President Obama in the march towards winning Trade Promotion Authority, the ability to fast track trade bills without the ability to amend them, he is being forced to team up with Republicans who have opposed such measures as Comprehensive Immigration Reform and appointments to the National Labor Relations Board in an effort to shore up serious opposition from within his own party. This shows that Obama is willing to do whatever it takes to push the agreement through, including alienating unions who have withheld campaign contributions to Democrats in order to re-direct those resources to defeating TPP.

Joe Marchin summarized the stance against TPP by saying, "If this bill is as good for the American worker as proponents have claimed, then the administration and anybody else should not find it objectionable to see the details before Congress is forced to grant the
President trade promotion authority." Warren and Marchin have requested that the content of the bill revealed, which shouldn't be asking to much considering that former President Bush did the same thing with the Free Trade Area for the Americas (FTAA) in the early 2000's. Labor standards and enforcement of those standards should never be kept secret, especially during the negotiation phase
.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/05/22/1386927/-TPP-Remains-Classified-after-Trade-Transparency-Act-is-Blocked-by-Senate-Republicans#

Ok, that report is from Daily Kos and contains some obvious errors (Senator Orrin Hatch of Arizona) but a similar report can be found at Breitbart.  http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/05/21/sen-hatch-defends-obamatrade-shuts-down-push-for-transparency/

This may be the greatest trade agreement in the history of the world but few would know since few can read it.

Why?
Members of the anti-Trump cabal: Now that Mr Trump has sewn up the nomination, I want you to know I feel your pain.

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,804
  • Gender: Male
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
Re: Senate approves Obama trade bill, sending fast-track to House
« Reply #12 on: May 24, 2015, 08:50:53 am »
  Nope  won't happen.

I get the rare burst of optimism that people are fundamentally good.  :shrug:
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline flowers

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,798
Re: Senate approves Obama trade bill, sending fast-track to House
« Reply #13 on: May 24, 2015, 04:17:15 pm »
I get the rare burst of optimism that people are fundamentally good.  :shrug:
:laugh:  People are fundamentally good. Government not so good.