Author Topic: FERGUSTAN: CNN Anchor Renames Troubled Town. Freudian slip or liberal script?  (Read 125 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 59,402
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
FERGUSTAN: CNN Anchor Renames Troubled Town

Freudian slip or liberal script?

8.23.2014 |
| Caleb Howe |

On CNN on Saturday, anchor Jim Sciutto referred to the city of Ferguson, Missouri as "Fergustan" during a segment of Newsroom covering the militarization of police departments in the United States. The slip-up occurred when he was describing gear used by police in Ferguson in the last few weeks.

"Just this hour, we learned that President Obama wants a review of federal programs that allow police departments to purchase surplus military hardware like we saw on the ground in Fergustan .. Ferguson in the last few weeks."

Of course, it will be of no surprise to anyone that this is not a new nickname for the town. Liberal megasite The Huffington Post used the term over a week ago in a blog post. Many other opinion articles have used it since. And naturally, it's been all over Twitter.

But CNN is not part of that crowd. They are straight news, not a talking points warehouse. Right?
« Last Edit: August 24, 2014, 06:50:23 AM by rangerrebew »
There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.
Public virtue cannot exist in a nation without private, and public virtue is the only foundation of republics. There must be a positive passion for the public good, the public interest, honour, power and glory, established in the minds of the people, or there can be no republican government, nor any real liberty: and this public passion must be superior to all private passions. John Adams

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo