Author Topic: Journal of Medical Ethics: Babies Cause Global Warming  (Read 458 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50,185
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Journal of Medical Ethics: Babies Cause Global Warming
« on: August 17, 2014, 11:50:58 AM »
Journal of Medical Ethics: Babies Cause Global Warming

Posted on August 15, 2014 by Philip Hodges — 126 Comments   
 

It’s no secret that those in power believe that the earth is overpopulated. And isn’t it ironic that those advocating stemming the population have large families themselves? They can have big families, because they view themselves as superior to everyone else. Everyone else is poor and uneducated and therefore needs to be sterilized (or aborted) so that the world isn’t filled with their filthy progeny.

Besides, in a world that’s burning up as a result of dirty human activity, the last thing that we need is more humans. Or, as the Journal of Medical Ethics calls them, “carbon legacies.” We can work to reduce these needless carbon emitters by heavily regulating the Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) industry, like in vitro fertilization.

Life News reported:

…[ I]n the ever more radical Journal of Medical Ethics, Cristina Richie, of Boston College’s Department of Theology, argues that these technologies should be regulated to limit the number of children–called “carbon legacies,” as a means of fighting climate change. From the article:

“A carbon footprint is the aggregate of resource use and carbon emissions over a person’s life. A carbon legacy occurs when a person chooses to procreate. All people have carbon footprints; only people with biological children have carbon legacies.

 



[…]

“Through the use of ARTs multiple children are born, adding to worldwide carbon emissions. This is a burden on the already over-taxed ecosystem to support new beings who might not have existed without medical intervention. It is therefore the obligation of environmental policymakers, the ethical and medical communities, and even society to carefully weigh the interests of our shared planet with a business that intentionally creates more humans when we must reduce our carbon impact.

“While population growth and ARTs are not the primary environmental issue that should concern ecologists and bioethicists, the numbers of ART babies are increasing at an exponential rate. If we were to look at these numbers in terms of carbon emissions instead of raw population growth data, the statistics look grim.

“The unregulated ART business can no longer be endorsed and the medical industry ought not operate in an environmental vacuum. Retrenchment in all areas of life is the key to slowing down or halting carbon emissions that lead to climate change. For each child made through medical intervention a carbon legacy results. ARTs should be allocated with due concern for the environment and sober consideration for the implications of climate change.

Carbon caps on the fertility business and eliminating funded ARTs for those who are not biologically infertile are the beginning of an environmentally sustainable ART business.

Abortion was never about women’s rights. That was just the marketing slogan. It’s more about keeping the population down to a “sustainable” and more “manageable” level. They’ve since added global warming into the mix and are using that as an excuse to solve our “overpopulation” problem. Having only one child (or none at all) is the environmentally friendly thing to do. Soon, we’ll have to pay taxes for every child we have beyond that one-child threshold. Mandatory sterilization or abortion will be called for in cases where families can’t afford to pay the tax or for those who insist on having “too many kids.” And it will all be sold to people using global warming hysterics.

Read more at http://lastresistance.com/6887/journal-medical-ethics-babies-cause-global-warming/#fpmdgA7rZwtTjbvw.99
« Last Edit: August 17, 2014, 03:11:57 PM by Oceander »
America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves. Abraham Lincoln

Offline kevindavis

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,724
Re: Journal of Medical Ethics: Babies Cause Global Warming
« Reply #1 on: August 17, 2014, 11:59:29 AM »
Look for the rats to adopt some kind of population control measure..
"Die-hard conservatives thought that if I couldn't get everything I asked for, I should jump off the cliff with the flag flying-go down in flames. No, if I can get 70 or 80 percent of what it is I'm trying to get ... I'll take that and then continue to try to get the rest in the future."

Ronald Reagan

"We must continue to go into space for humanity.” - Dr. Stephen Hawking

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50,185
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Re: Journal of Medical Ethics: Babies Cause Global Warming
« Reply #2 on: August 17, 2014, 12:22:20 PM »
Look for the rats to adopt some kind of population control measure..

Check out "after birth a abortion."
America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves. Abraham Lincoln

Online Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 42,263
  • #NeverTrumpForever
Re: Journal of Medical Ethics: Babies Cause Global Warming
« Reply #3 on: August 17, 2014, 03:13:25 PM »
The global warming religious cult is becoming as offensive, and dangerous, as is radical islam.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2014, 03:13:45 PM by Oceander »
Trump does not represent the will of the people.  If we really wanted to respect the decision of "the people," then Clinton would be the president-elect, not Trump, for the simple reason that she won the popular vote.

Offline kevindavis

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,724
Re: Journal of Medical Ethics: Babies Cause Global Warming
« Reply #4 on: August 17, 2014, 06:45:27 PM »
The Global Warming movement is about one thing: control.. Not about saving the planet.. It is about control in what we eat, and what we drive...  Now they are starting to dictate in how many kids we have and next telling us where to live.. Basically being forced to live in the city.
"Die-hard conservatives thought that if I couldn't get everything I asked for, I should jump off the cliff with the flag flying-go down in flames. No, if I can get 70 or 80 percent of what it is I'm trying to get ... I'll take that and then continue to try to get the rest in the future."

Ronald Reagan

"We must continue to go into space for humanity.” - Dr. Stephen Hawking

Offline jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11,237
  • ^^ Actual picture of me.
    • Fullervision
Re: Journal of Medical Ethics: Babies Cause Global Warming
« Reply #5 on: August 17, 2014, 08:17:20 PM »
The ironic thing about it is that those who believe it almost invariably live in societies where the birth rate has plummeted to below replacement (i.e. white Europe and white America). It is the Third World, the bastions of "diversity" (tribal turmoil), that is driving the birth rate in this world sky high. In centuries past, disease would kill off many of them, but modern health care is preventing that process.
Proud supporter of the Free Conservative Resistance

"Just because people in positions of authority are stupid, it doesn’t mean you have to go along with it." —Arlo Guthrie

The enemy of my enemies may not be my friend, but it's still fun watching him make my enemies squirm.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf