Author Topic: 12 States Sue Obama Administration for Regulatory ‘Overreach’  (Read 160 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 70,996
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them

12 States Sue Obama Administration for Regulatory ‘Overreach’

Natalie Johnson / August 07, 2014

Coal country is striking back at the federal government in the latest “war on coal” battle.

Twelve states are suing the Environmental Protection Agency to deter impending restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power plants.

The states filed the lawsuit in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday, accusing the EPA of “overstepping its legal boundaries” under the Clean Air Act.


West Virginia is leading the lawsuit along with Alabama, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, South Carolina and Wyoming.

“This lawsuit represents another effort by our office to invalidate the EPA’s proposed rule that will have devastating effects on West Virginia’s jobs and its economy,” West Virginia Atty. Gen. Patrick Morrisey said in a statement.

The state, which heavily relies on coal, has already begun to feel the regulation’s impact. A major coal company, Alpha Natural Resources, announced last week that it might lay off 1,100 West Virginia mining employees, citing the rule as one of the reasons.

Morrisey said his office plans to use “every legal tool available” to defend coal miners and their families from the Obama Administration’s “overreach.”

“We can’t afford to see more announcements like we saw with Alpha Natural Resources,” Morrisey said.

>>> Commentary: Climate Change Is a Fact. But These New Emissions Regulations Won’t Help the Environment.

The EPA declined to comment directly on the lawsuit, but responded to Morrisey’s claim that the regulation will destroy the coal industry.

Liz Purchia, an EPA spokeswoman, asserted that the Clean Power Plan proposal gives states “enormous flexibility” in deciding how they would like to meet “pollution reduction goals,” according to the Los Angeles Times.

Heritage Foundation economist Nick Loris disagrees.

“The EPA is telling states there’s flexibility in this regulation, but the reality is no state is going to escape the economic pain of higher energy costs these regulations will bring,” said Loris, Heritage’s Herbert and Joyce Morgan Fellow.

The lawsuit alleges that the EPA doesn’t have the legal authority to dictate the regulations, saying that the Clean Air Act prohibits the agency from regulating coal-fired power plants using different sections of the act.

“[The lawsuit] is a positive sign that states are stepping up,” Loris said. “More states should work together to prevent the EPA from limiting Americans’ energy choices.”
« Last Edit: August 08, 2014, 05:39:12 AM by rangerrebew »
"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim tribute to patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness -- these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. . . . reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principles."
George Washington

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
Benjamin Franklin

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo