Author Topic: Obama's Coy Threat To Act On Immigration Would Tear Up The Constitution By CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER  (Read 247 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 244,764
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials-on-the-right/080714-712320-obama-threat-of-executive-action-is-based-on-false-claim-of-inaction-by-gop.htm?p=full

Obama's Coy Threat To Act On Immigration Would Tear Up The Constitution

By CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER
 Posted 06:15 PM ET

The president is impatient. Congress won't act on immigration, he says, and therefore he will.

The White House is coy as to exactly what the president will do. But the leaks point to an executive order essentially legalizing an enormous new class of illegal immigrants, perhaps up to 5 million people.

One doesn't usually respond to rumors. But this is an idea so bad and so persistently peddled by the White House, it has already been pre-emptively criticized by such unusual suspects as (liberal) constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley, concerned about yet another usurpation of legislative power by the "uber presidency," and the Washington Post editorial page, which warned that such a move would "tear up the Constitution."

If this is just a trial balloon, the time to shoot it down is now. The administration claims such an executive order would simply be a corrective to GOP inaction on the current immigration crisis — 57,000 unaccompanied minors, plus tens of thousands of families, crashing through and overwhelming the southern border.

This rationale is a fraud.

First, the charge that Republicans have done nothing is plainly false. Last week, the House of Representatives passed legislation that deals reasonably with this immigrant wave.

It changes a 2008 sex-trafficking law never intended for (and inadvertently inviting) mass migration — a change Obama endorsed before caving to his left and flip-flopping. It also provides funds for emergency processing and assistance to the kids who are here.

Second, it's a total non sequitur. Suspending deportation for millions of long-resident illegal immigrants has nothing to do with the current wave of newly arrived minors. If anything, it would aggravate the problem by sending the message that if you manage to get here illegally, eventually you'll be legalized.

Third, and most fatal, it is deeply unconstitutional. Don't believe me. Listen to Obama. He's repeatedly made the case for years. As in:

"I swore an oath to uphold the laws on the books. ... Now, I know some people want me to bypass Congress and change the (immigration) laws on my own. ... That's not how our Constitution is written" (July 25, 2011).

"This notion that somehow I can just change the laws unilaterally is just not true. ... There are laws on the books that I have to enforce" (Sep. 28, 2011).

"If, in fact, I could solve all these problems without passing laws in Congress, then I would do so. But we're also a nation of laws" (Nov. 25, 2013).

Laws created by Congress, not by executive fiat. That's what distinguishes a constitutional republic from the banana kind.

Moreover, Obama had control of both houses of Congress during his first two years in office — and did nothing about immigration. So why now? Because he's facing a disastrous midterm election.

An executive order so sweeping and egregiously lawless would be impeachment bait. It would undoubtedly provoke a constitutional crisis and stir impeachment talk — and perhaps even the beginning of proceedings — thus scrambling the electoral deck.

As in 1998, it would likely backfire against the GOP and save Democrats from a certain sixth-year midterm shellacking. Such a calculation — amnesty-by-fiat to deliberately court impeachment — is breathtakingly cynical. But clever. After all, there is no danger of impeachment succeeding.

There will never be 67 votes in the Senate to convict. But talking it up is a political bonanza for Democrats, stirring up an otherwise listless and dispirited base. Last Monday alone the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee raised more than $1 million from anti-impeachment direct mail.

Apart from the money, impeachment talk energizes Democrats and deflects attention from the real-life issues that are dragging them down — the economy, ObamaCare, the failures of Obama's foreign policy. Everything, in other words, that has sunk Obama to 40% approval, the lowest ebb of his presidency.

There's an awful irony here. Barack Obama entered our national consciousness with an electrifying 2004 speech calling for healing the nation's divisions and transcending narrow identities of race, region, religion, politics and ideology. Four years later, that promise made him president.

Yet today he is prepared to inflict on the nation a destructive, divisive, calculated violation of the constitutional order and national comity — for the narrowest partisan advantage.

For this president in particular, who offered a politics of transcendence, this would constitute a betrayal of the highest order.

According to White House leaks, the executive order will be promulgated by summer's end. Time enough to reconsider. Don't do it, Mr. President.

Support the USO

Offline Chieftain

  • AMF, YOYO
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,633
  • Your what hurts??
I don't think he had the stones.  This has all been a lot of talk intended to help raise funds for Dhimmies.  I think the pushback on this from the Democrat base has been strong and is getting louder all the time.  Obama's black base has no use for this at all, and they already think he welched on all the goodies he promised them and they have come to believe they are owed.  For him to give illegals a work permit and citizenship with all the goodies that come along with it will not go over well.

We'll see, but this guy is all talk.


Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 244,764
KRAUTHAMMER was on Greta tonight and he firmly believes Obama will grant amnesty just to throw the country into a constitutional crisis hoping the Repubs will impeach him.....his theory that the impeachment would benefit the Dimwits in the upcoming election...

Support the USO

Offline Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 42,368
  • #NeverTrumpForever
KRAUTHAMMER was on Greta tonight and he firmly believes Obama will grant amnesty just to throw the country into a constitutional crisis hoping the Repubs will impeach him.....his theory that the impeachment would benefit the Dimwits in the upcoming election...

Unfortunately, impeachment would.
Trump does not represent the will of the people.  If we really wanted to respect the decision of "the people," then Clinton would be the president-elect, not Trump, for the simple reason that she won the popular vote.

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 8,712
Oceander wrote above:
[[ Unfortunately, impeachment would. ]]

It wouldn't if the Republicans keep their impeachin' powder dry until after the election !

Offline Chieftain

  • AMF, YOYO
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,633
  • Your what hurts??
KRAUTHAMMER was on Greta tonight and he firmly believes Obama will grant amnesty just to throw the country into a constitutional crisis hoping the Repubs will impeach him.....his theory that the impeachment would benefit the Dimwits in the upcoming election...

Unless the Republicans don't bite until after the election.  Timing is everything, and this is a dangerous game to be playing.


Offline evadR²

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,197
Rush made an excellent point today.  The constitution is only as good as the people elected to congress and the white house.
If you have people without honor or principles, then the constitution isn't worth the paper it's written on.

Such is today's situation, dishonorable scum with no principles or honor who are bound together by greed and the common thirst for power.
November 6, 2012, a day in infamy...the death of a republic as we know it.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf