Author Topic: Democrat On U.S. Civil Rights Commission Wants Speech Codes For ‘Adolescent’ 21-Year-Olds  (Read 618 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 67,485
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
- The Daily Caller - http://dailycaller.com -



Democrat On U.S. Civil Rights Commission Wants Speech Codes For ‘Adolescent’ 21-Year-Olds

Posted By Eric Owens On 9:07 AM 08/02/2014 In | No Comments




A Democrat on the U.S. Civil Rights Commission has urged campus restrictions on First Amendment-protected speech because, he believes, the still-developing brains of college students cannot properly process certain dangerous ideas.

The civil rights commissioner is Michael Yaki, a former senior adviser to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.

The Washington Post’s Eugene Volokh was present at a commission on a briefing on sexual harassment law in education last week when Yaki made his bizarro comments.

The civil rights commissioner said he favors outlawing speech that would be grossly unpopular, such as “a slave auction at a fraternity engagement” or a celebration of Latino culture that involves “making everyone dress as janitors and mop floors.”

Yaki also wants to turn Miss America-type pageants into campus speech crimes. He expressed his belief in the unacceptable dangers of “a situation involving women” in which they “parade around in skimpy clothing and turn in some show or something.”

In embarrassingly vague fashion, Yaki struggled mightily to make some kind of coherent point at the civil rights commission hearing.

“I mean where do you think you can, that the university can’t deal with ensuring the route it has environment that is not oppressive or hostile because obviously a campus, especially certain types of campuses where there’s a lot of — where — that are geographically compact, that have a lot of working and living situations in a close area to create a campus atmosphere,” the language-addled law school graduate stuttered.

“Doesn’t that gravitate toward having greater ability to proscribe certain types of conduct that have the ability to escalate beyond what anyone would consider to be reasonable or acceptable?”

Yaki, who spent many of his formative years in highly authoritarian countries, then distinguished himself from fellow garden-variety progressives who seek to criminalize ideas they don’t like by, hilariously, suggesting that his repressive views are backed by scientists (and citing a Supreme Court case concerning the death penalty).

“It has to do with science,” Yaki confidently explained. “More and more, the vast majority, in fact — I think — overall in bodies of science is that young people, not just K through 12 but also between the ages of 16 to 20, 21 is where the brain is still in a stage of development.”

 
He went on to argue that “the juvenile or adolescent or young adult brain processes information” in ways that are “vastly different from the way that we adults do.” Consequently, he proclaimed, “when we sit back and talk about what is right or wrong in terms of First Amendment jurisprudence from a reasonable person’s standpoint, we are really not looking into the same referential viewpoint.”

The civil rights commissioner then laid out his sweeping, anti-free speech conclusion.

“There are very good and compelling reasons why broader policies and prohibitions on conduct in activities and in some instances speech are acceptable on a college campus level that might not be acceptable say in an adult work environment or in an adult situation,” he said.

Among many others, Hans Bader of the Competitive Enterprise Institute has criticized Yaki for his “depressing” arguments against free speech.

“Yaki’s claim that speech should be especially restricted on campus ‘because of the unique nature of a university campus setting’ turns basic free speech principles upside down,” Bader wrote in a recent essay. “Free speech is especially vital on college campuses, where students can learn how to deal with opposing points of view in a civil and constructive manner.”

Follow Eric on Twitter and on Facebook, and send education-related story tips to erico@dailycaller.com.


Article printed from The Daily Caller: http://dailycaller.com

URL to article: http://dailycaller.com/2014/08/02/democrat-on-u-s-civil-rights-commission-wants-speech-codes-for-adolescent-21-year-olds/
Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago

Online aligncare

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,853
Only a double face palm will do here.  :facepalm2: :facepalm2:
NeverTrumpers are trying to deny you YOUR voice, YOUR presidential choice.

Online kevindavis

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,932
I thought the left believed in Free Speech..
GOP House members came to Paul Ryan to be Speaker. He didn't come to them. And he was everybody's conservative darling back in 2012. So unless 1 of the remaining 240 wants to step up & do a better job in budgeting & negotiations & herding the party cats, then everybody please STFU. You go to battle with the army you have, not the one you want but don't have.

Kevin Davis

Online andy58-in-nh

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,962
I thought the left believed in Free Speech..

Yes, the Left believes in free speech, as long as it is their speech.

Beneath the thin skin of every Progressive, a zealous little tyrant waits to emerge.
Liberalism isn't really about making the world a better place. It's about reassuring the elites that they are good people for wanting to rule over it.

Online kevindavis

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,932
Yes, the Left believes in free speech, as long as it is their speech.

Beneath the thin skin of every Progressive, a zealous little tyrant waits to emerge.


That is true, and yet they are the ones who call us a tyrants..
GOP House members came to Paul Ryan to be Speaker. He didn't come to them. And he was everybody's conservative darling back in 2012. So unless 1 of the remaining 240 wants to step up & do a better job in budgeting & negotiations & herding the party cats, then everybody please STFU. You go to battle with the army you have, not the one you want but don't have.

Kevin Davis

Online DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 31,823
Yes, the Left believes in free speech, as long as it is their speech.

Beneath the thin skin of every Progressive, a zealous little tyrant waits to emerge.

But see....if the roles were reversed, the 'gentleman'....and I use that word loosely...they would be demonstrated against, boycotted and harassed, perhaps physically.

So, therefore, I vote that he gets the crap literally be beat out of him.

But alas....our side doesn't ever seem to want to cross that line.   AND THEY KNOW IT!   it empowers them.

They need to understand fear.....like a Syrian Christian feels like today.
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

For all the sad words,
of tongue and pen,
the saddest are these...

It might have been.   ...Maud Muller

Online aligncare

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,853
Yes, the Left believes in free speech, as long as it is their speech.

Beneath the thin skin of every Progressive, a zealous little tyrant waits to emerge.

Seems that way, don't it?

I think most are sincere – wrong, but sincere... It's just when one's argument is emotionally based there's a tendency for them to lose control of their composure. Yeah, that's probably it.
NeverTrumpers are trying to deny you YOUR voice, YOUR presidential choice.

Online andy58-in-nh

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,962
Seems that way, don't it?

I think most are sincere – wrong, but sincere... It's just when one's argument is emotionally based there's a tendency for them to lose control of their composure. Yeah, that's probably it.

The reason that the Left's arguments are emotionally-based is that they are compelled to control others, and they cannot justify such desires by means of reasoned argumentation. 
Liberalism isn't really about making the world a better place. It's about reassuring the elites that they are good people for wanting to rule over it.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 67,485
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
The reason that the Left's arguments are emotionally-based is that they are compelled to control others, and they cannot justify such desires by means of reasoned argumentation.

Lincoln once observed that emotions are fine in battle or an emergency but after that it is only cold reason that makes a difference.  But, being liberals, they have probably haven't heard of Lincoln much less study him.
Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago

Online truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,345
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
    • The place where argument addicts can go
UC Berkeley, 1960s, Free Speech movement.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Speech_Movement

from cited wiki article:

"There was a substantial voter backlash against the players involved in the Free Speech Movement. Ronald Reagan won an unexpected victory in the fall of 1966 and was elected Governor; the newly elected governor directed the UC Board of Regents to dismiss UC President Clark Kerr because of the perception that he had been too soft on the protesters. The FBI had kept a secret file on Kerr.

Reagan had gained political traction by campaigning on a platform to "clean up the mess in Berkeley". "



"God must love the common man, he made so many of them.”

Abe Lincoln

Offline Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 46,192
  • #ToldYouSo
Seems that way, don't it?

I think most are sincere – wrong, but sincere...

*  *  *

That is what a "useful idiot" is.

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,967
Paging Mario Savio....

Please pick up the nearest RED courtesy phone.

The U.S. "Civil Rights Commission" is awaiting your advice.

The number you need to call is 800-USA-1984 ...

Offline mountaineer

  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 35,434
Paging Mario Savio....
Yeah, whatever happened to those 1960s radicals who demanded free speech, anyway? Oh, that's right, they got jobs in the Clinton and Obama administrations.
Life is too short to leave the key to your happiness in someone else's pocket.

Offline GourmetDan

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,168
That is true, and yet they are the ones who call us a tyrants..


Yes, of course.  When one is a tyrant, racist or whatever; they tend to think everyone else is like them and look for evidence to confirm their belief.  Naturally, what one seeks, one finds.

   

That's why I like conservatives.  I like being left alone...


"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left." - Ecclesiastes 10:2

"The sole purpose of the Republican Party is to serve as an ineffective alternative to the Democrat Party." - GourmetDan


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf