Author Topic: Open Borders and How Hitler Could Have Taken Over America  (Read 105 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,170
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them

Open Borders and How Hitler Could Have Taken Over America

Posted 19 hours ago by Gary DeMar Filed under Amnesty, Constitution, Foreign Policy, Government, History, Immigration, Law, Law Enforcement, National Security, Politics

A number of writers are arguing that America’s borders should be completely open. Free access to all! It’s the very nature of freedom.

How could a tyrant like Adolf Hitler have used open borders to his political advantage? Remember, given the premise of those who don’t want any borders or restrictions, anybody and everybody would have free access to America, including its political system of free elections.

Let’s take a look at some “alternative history” as a way of putting such a radical idea to the test.

Historical “what ifs” abound. What if Adolf Hitler had been afflicted with the family name Schicklgruber? For the first thirty-nine years of Adolf Hitler’s father’s life, he was known as Alois Schicklgruber.

"There are many weird twists of fate in the strange life of Adolf Hitler, but none more odd than this one which took place thirteen years before his birth. Had the eighty-four-year-old wandering miller not made his unexpected reappearance to recognize the paternity of his thirty-nine-year-old son nearly thirty years after the death of his mother, Adolf Hitler would have been born Adolf Schicklgruber. There may not be much or anything in a name, but I have heard Germans speculate whether Hitler could have become the master of Germany had he been known to the world as Schicklgruber. It has a slightly comic sound as it rolls off the tongue of a South German. Can one imagine the frenzied German masses acclaiming a Schicklgruber with their thunderous 'Heils'? 'Heil Schicklgruber!'? Not only was 'Heil Hitler!' used as a Wagnerian, pagan-like chant by the multitude in the mystic pageantry of the massive Nazi rallies, but it became the obligatory form of greeting between Germans during the Third Reich, even on the telephone, where it replaced the conventional 'Hello.' 'Heil Schicklgruber!'? It is a little difficult to imagine."[1]

Hitler confided to his only childhood friend, August Kubizek, “that the name Schicklgruber ‘seemed to him so uncouth, so boorish, apart from being so clumsy and unpractical. He found ‘Heidler’ . . . too soft; but ‘Hitler’ sounded rich and was easy to remember.”[2]

Consider for a moment an alternative history like that described in Philip K. Dick’s Nazis-in-America Hugo-Award-winning novel The Man in the High Castle (1962).[3]man in the high castle

What if America had an unrestricted border policy in 1930?

What if Adolf Hitler had decided that he would take advantage of America’s open borders policy to accomplish his dream of a thousand year Reich? No need for militarization. No lost lives. No protracted war. Genius.

He could have sent German families to Mexico by tens of thousands every month, had them cross our southern border, and obtain American citizenship (if that was even necessary). In the 1940 election, these millions of new German Americans could vote for a Nazi slate of candidates and change America from the inside -- democratically.

Let's bring the "what if" up to date.

Consider what could take place if Muslims wanted to realize their dream of a worldwide Caliphate? They could enter the United States by the tens of millions. Within a decade they could change the power structure in America without a single beheading.

The beheadings would come later for any and all that resisted.

These are some very good reasons as to why borders are important. Don't think that the above alternative history is not possible. It's a very real possibility.

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim tribute to patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness -- these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. . . . reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principles."
George Washington

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
Benjamin Franklin

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo