Author Topic: Why Does Anyone Believe the State Department … After Being Caught In Repeated Lies?  (Read 170 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,030
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
- The Daily Sheeple - -

Why Does Anyone Believe the State Department … After Being Caught In Repeated Lies?

Posted By Contributing Author On July 27, 2014 @ 9:09 am In Conspiracy Fact and Theory,Controlling the Herd,Editor's Choice,Featured,General,Headlines & Head Lies,International,Media and Propaganda,News,People,Political Gamesmanship,Politics,Videos and Media,War and Conflict,War and Conflict | 6 Comments

statedeptspox [1]

U.S. security and intelligence agencies have repeatedly been caught [2] lying about matters of war and peace.

After being caught in one lie, the State Department doesn’t apologize … it just launches a new lie.

While they would have you believe that their old lies are irrelevant because they’re “ancient history” [3], this is still continuing to today.

In the last year, for example, State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf has been busted again and again for lying:
•She said [4] last year that – because no one else could have carried out the attack, it must have been the Syrian government – that Syria’s Assad must have been  responsible.   She also claimed [5] that the Syrian government was destroying evidence, so that the case could not be proven.    But it has since been proven that the Syrian [6] rebels [7] or their allies were probably behind the chemical weapon attack.  Pulitzer-prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh (who uncovered the Iraq prison torture scandal and the Mai Lai massacre in Vietnam) says [8] that high-level American sources tell him that the Turkish government [9] carried out the chemical weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government
•She tried to kill [10] the peace deal with Syria, which allowed Syria to destroy all chemical weapons in return for the U.S. agreeing not to invade
•She claimed [11] in June – without evidence – that Russia was sending tanks into Ukraine
•She blamed Russia for the shootdown of Malaysian airlines Flight 17 over Ukraine. Rather than offering any evidence, she told the press they should just trust the U.S. – and doubt Russia – on faith [3]. But – later that same day -  senior U.S. intelligence officials said [12] there was no evidence that Russia was connected with the shootdown

Now, Harf is claiming [13] – with no evidence whatsoever – that Russia is firing artillery from its own territory into Ukraine to hit Ukrainian military sites.

The mainstream American press is starting to finally wake up.  At the press conference [14] in which Harf announced this new allegation, Associated Press reporter Matthew Lee said:

Marie, I think that it would be best for all concerned here if when you make an allegation like that, you’re able to back it up with something more than just “because I said so”.

This is not a minor claim.  The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff – Martin Dempsey – says the U.S. is dusting off cold war military plans [15] based on these new allegations.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple [16]

Contributed by of Washington’s Blog [17].

Article printed from The Daily Sheeple:

URL to article:

URLs in this post:

[1] Image:

[2] repeatedly been caught:

[3] “ancient history”:

[4] said:

[5] claimed:

[6] Syrian:

[7] rebels:

[8] says:

[9] Turkish government:

[10] tried to kill:

[11] claimed:

[12] senior U.S. intelligence officials said:

[13] claiming:

[14] press conference:

[15] dusting off cold war military plans:

[16] The Daily Sheeple:

[17] Washington’s Blog:

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim tribute to patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness -- these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. . . . reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principles."
George Washington

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
Benjamin Franklin

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo