Author Topic: Democrats’ Minimum Wage Stunt Laughably Backfires  (Read 342 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 73,026
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Democrats’ Minimum Wage Stunt Laughably Backfires
« on: July 26, 2014, 01:34:02 PM »
The American Spectator

Democrats’ Minimum Wage Stunt Laughably Backfires

By Bill Zeiser on 7.25.14 | 1:47AM

It's been five years since Congress last raised the federal minimum wage, and the laugh-a-minute gang over at Organizing for Action wants you to do something about it. You might better remember the group as Organizing for America. An offshoot of President Obama's campaign apparatus, the grassroots organization is tasked with promoting his legislative agenda. Not sure why they dropped "America" from their name. Perhaps too many members found it offensive. I kid, I kid. Sort of. Anyhow, by their calculation, people who earn minimum wage are left with about $77 per week for food and transportation after other expenses. In the grand tradition of meaningless political theater, they are challenging sympathetic Americans to live for one week on that budget and chronicle the results on the Twitter hashtag #LiveTheWage. The results could not possibly be more entertaining.

The first clue that this hacky stunt was destined to go poorly? An information sheet about the challenge distributed at It features such condescending gems as "consider using weekly coupons to save money" and "gas is also expensive, so you may rely on public transportation instead of driving." I suspect that many sensible Americans, rich and poor alike, were already aware of these revelations prior to reading a fact sheet hammered out by some student intern from Bowdoin spending a summer in D.C.

This next line is a stumper: "[a]nd because minimum wage workers usually don't have this option, try not to eat fre meals at other people's houses to skirt the budget." Why don't minimum wage workers have that option? It seems to me that the occasional shared meal would be an excellent idea for friends and family members on a budget. The organizers of Live the Wage seem to believe that we don't allow the less fortunate to have friends and family. Of course, they also want people to become increasingly comfortable with government-based solutions, so I can see why they'd downplay the possibility of privately helping out those you love.

President Obama himself has remained silent on the matter. Just kidding. He sent out a series of tweets with graphics meticulously color coordinated with the Live the Wage website. These are all variations on the theme that while the price of goods has increased over the past five years, the minimum wage has not. But as Twitter users such as @ExJon and @GlomarResponder shrewdly pointed out, Obama has been president the whole time. His gripe amounts to a tacit admission that he has presided over a period of economic instability and rampant inflation.

What of those brave souls who have taken up the challenge to live for a week on a paltry 77 bucks? Representative Jan Schakowsky, a congresswoman from Illinois, posted a picture of her lovingly handwritten poverty menu--what the rest of us might think of as a grocery list--on her Twitter feed. The poor woman has been reduced to eating such items as muffins, apples, cereal, chicken salad, hot dogs, and baked beans. She even posed for the camera while making tuna sandwiches. It's disturbing, though perhaps not surprising, that a sitting member of Congress is so far out of touch. This menu is supposed to make us feel bad? Most Americans already eat that way and see nothing wrong with it. Hell, I eat tuna sandwiches at least once a week.

The tweets from people who aren't sitting members of congress are just as bad. Twitter user @SooperMexican leveled barbs at a 28 year old woman who admitted that she had to learn how to peel a banana expressly for the challenge. "I hate bananas, but they're cheap," she lamented. did an excellent job of compiling the most clever responses to the Tweets of Rep. Schakowsky, President Obama, and others.

It's probably too much to hope for the Democrats--or any political party, for that matter--to dispense with silly political theater. But if they absolutely must make an appeal to pathos, they should at least do it right. In this case, all the donkeys have proven is that their policies helped cause the problem, and that it's possible to eat fairly well on minimum wage.

The American Spectator Foundation is the 501(c)(3) organization responsible for publishing The American Spectator magazine and training aspiring journalists who espouse traditional American values. Your contributions are tax deductible to the extent permitted by law. Each donor receives a year-end summary of their giving for tax purposes.

Copyright 2013, The American Spectator. All rights reserved.

Source URL:
"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim tribute to patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness -- these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. . . . reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principles."
George Washington

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
Benjamin Franklin

Offline massadvj

  • Editorial Advisor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,183
    • Auktion Online
Re: Democrats’ Minimum Wage Stunt Laughably Backfires
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2014, 01:46:24 PM »
If they are really interested in reducing the variance in income distribution, shouldn't they also impose a MAXIMUM wage?  Never mind.  I'd hate to give them any ideas.  They would if they could.
"She only coughs when she lies."

Offline Relic

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,967
Re: Democrats’ Minimum Wage Stunt Laughably Backfires
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2014, 02:03:13 PM »
If they are really interested in reducing the variance in income distribution, shouldn't they also impose a MAXIMUM wage?  Never mind.  I'd hate to give them any ideas.  They would if they could.

Of course, the political elite would be exempt.

Offline Once-Ler

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,619
  • How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Trump
Re: Democrats’ Minimum Wage Stunt Laughably Backfires
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2014, 05:27:40 PM »
I can't believe Republican's won't let the poor have friends.  And tuna fish for lunch?  What is this Russia?
"Racism is evil. And those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans."  -  President Donald J Trump

Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!.....
...They have been in our country for many years through no fault of their own - brought in by parents at young age. Plus BIG border security
       Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump 5:35 AM - Sep 14, 2017

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo