Author Topic: More Than Two Thirds of Americans Think Elections Are Rigged for Incumbents  (Read 248 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 69,738
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them


July 15, 2014


More Than Two Thirds of Americans Think Elections Are Rigged for Incumbents

Christine Rousselle

7/13/2014 2:58:00 PM - Christine Rousselle

More than two thirds of Americans surveyed in a recent Rasmussen poll say that they believe election rules are "rigged" to ensure that incumbents are victorious.


Some 68 percent of respondents in the new Rasmussen survey say the high retention rate in Congress is because lawmakers are able to exploit favorable election rules, not because they do a good job representing their constituents.

And 48 percent of likely voters believe that American elections are not fair to voters — the highest percentage since 2004. By contrast, 39 percent of voters say elections are fair. Of the likely voters surveyed, 14 percent say they’re not sure.


 

The poll consisted of a survey of 1,000 likely voters who were asked a variety of questions about their perceptions of election fairness.

Since 2012, roughly nine out of 10 incumbents seeking election in the House and Senate were reelected. The presidency has even better odds--an incumbent has only been defeated four times in the last century.

A definite advantage that incumbents have over challengers is that oftentimes they do not have to campaign through a primary election. A primary exposes the flaws of all candidates--including the eventual party nominee. That, coupled with the name recognition of the incumbent, is a definite disadvantage for any challenger.

What reforms should happen to ensure a "fairer" election?

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/christinerousselle/2014/07/13/more-than-two-thirds-of-americans-thing-elections-are-rigged-for-incumbents-n1861718?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm
« Last Edit: July 15, 2014, 07:57:25 AM by rangerrebew »
Constitutions are not designed for metaphysical or logical subtleties, for niceties of expression, for critical propriety, for elaborate shades of meaning, or for the exercise of philosophical acuteness or judicial research. They are instruments of a practical nature, founded on the common business of human life, adapted to common wants, designed for common use, and fitted for common understandings.

Joseph Story


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf