Trans-activist: All Babies Should Be Kept Genderless
By Rebekah Maxwell on July 11, 2014
This Week’s Sign the Apocalypse is Upon Us
Today, about 370,000 babies will be born across the world. That means 370,000 crimes against the greater evolution of humanity at the hands of backward doctors and nurses. You probably think it’s normal…even necessary. But in a split-second, they’ll ruin your child’s life forever.
How? With basic anatomy.
Because determining “boy” or “girl” is far too complicated for our enlightened age.
Transgender activist Christin Milloy took to webazine Slate to warn us all about the dangerous practice of “infant gender assignment”— which means defining a baby as a boy or a girl based on basic biology.
In his/her article, “Don’t Let Your Doctor Do This to Your Baby,” he/she (they?) calls defining a child’s sex at birth an insidious practice that “might just be Russian roulette with your baby’s life.”
Obstetricians, doctors, and midwives commit this procedure on infants every single day, in every single country. In reality, this treatment is performed almost universally without even asking for the parents’ consent, making this practice all the more insidious. It’s called infant gender assignment: When the doctor holds your child up to the harsh light of the delivery room, looks between its legs, and declares his opinion: It’s a boy or a girl, based on nothing more than a cursory assessment of your offspring’s genitals.
How dare they?! Declaring a person to be male or female depending on whether they are male or female! We don’t want doctors to examine our bodies and diagnose us based on our physical state! They are there to dispense drugs and boost our self-image.
We tell our children, “You can be anything you want to be.” We say, “A girl can be a doctor, a boy can be a nurse,” but why in the first place must this person be a boy and that person be a girl?
Umm…for the preservation of the species?
With infant gender assignment, in a single moment your baby’s life is instantly and brutally reduced from such infinite potentials down to one concrete set of expectations and stereotypes, and any behavioral deviation from that will be severely punished—both intentionally through bigotry, and unintentionally through ignorance. That doctor (and the power structure behind him) plays a pivotal role in imposing those limits on helpless infants, without their consent, and without your informed consent as a parent. This issue deserves serious consideration by every parent, because no matter what gender identity your child ultimately adopts, infant gender assignment has effects that will last through their whole life.
So, your baby’s life will be ruined forever the moment they are called either a boy or a girl. It’s not just society that we’re blaming for presumptive or constricting gender-roles…it’s now the doctors who call biology as they see it. It’s every parent who names these new little bundles of androgyny Patrick or Patricia…when they should all be Pat. Not to mention those evil pregnant mamas who celebrate their child’s gender before he/she/it is even born! Biological bigots.
If the diagnosis…er, imposition of a sex is the moment our lives are “ruined,” then it would seem we’ve moved from questioning our behavior to undermining our basic identity: it’s not just society that needs to change how we define gender, it’s the gender itself that is the problem.
It’s going to be pretty hard for me to enjoy being a girl if it’s a burgeoning hate crime to talk about me being a girl. But anything for the brave new world order, I suppose.
Milloy compares the fate of gender-assigned children to those who suffer racial discrimination, both plagued with “the wrong actions of hateful bullies whose wilful decisions were responsible for causing the pain.”
Infant gender assignment is a wilful decision, and as a maturing society we need to judge whether it might be a wrong action. Why must we force this on kids at birth? What is achieved, besides reinforcing tradition? What could be the harm in letting a child wait to declare for themself who they are, once they’re old enough (which is generally believed to happen around age 2 or 3)?
Absolutely. What is achieved by proclaiming a self-evident biological fact?
Why not let your 2-year old tell you what gender they want to be? After all, that’s what parents are for, to cater to their child’s preferred reality.
In fact, why stop there? What else has biology been lying to us about?
Why do we determine a child’s species at birth? Why not let your precious bundle of androgyny declare what species they want to be when they’re old enough to decide? Maybe your baby is really a dog on the inside.
Just because their parents are human (and male and female they were created), and their DNA is human, and they look, breathe, grow and function like humans…that doesn’t mean they want to be human. So why treat them as though they’re human?
Besides, two days before they were born, the law says they weren’t.
So why does it matter what science says…about anything
Read more at http://stevedeace.com/news/trans-activist-babies-kept-genderless/#UQdr4YMslGF2ZrIp.99