Author Topic: Sen. Judiciary Committee Endorses Amendment to Abridge Free Speech  (Read 323 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 73,248
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them

Sen. Judiciary Committee Endorses Amendment to Abridge Free Speech

12 July 2014 / 8 Comments
 
A proposed constitutional amendment to abridge the freedom of speech received the endorsement of the Senate Judiciary Committee by a 10-8 vote Thursday in an effort to overturn U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission and McCutcheon v. FEC.

The 2010 Citizens United ruling rejected on First Amendment grounds restrictions in the McCain-Feingold Campaign Reform Act of 2002 on spending for political advertising. In this year’s McCutcheon decision, the high court ruled that limits on how much a donor may contribute in aggregate to candidates for federal office, political parties, and political action committees are also violations of the First Amendment. Both decisions were by 5-4 votes of the justices, with the more conservative Republican appointees voting to strike down the restrictions and the liberal justices, appointed by Democratic presidents, voting to uphold them. Similarly, Thursday’s Judiciary Committee vote was strictly along party lines, with all 10 of the committee’s Democrats voting for the amendment and all eight of its Republican members voting against.

The Democrats voting for the proposed amendment were Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (Vermont), Dianne Feinstein (California), Charles Schumer (New York), Dick Durbin (Illinois), Sheldon Whitehead (Rhode Island), Amy Klobuchar and Al Franken (Minnesota), Christopher Coons (Delaware), Richard Blumenthal (Minnesota), and Mazie Hirono (Hawaii). Republicans voting against it were Charles Grassley (Iowa), Orrin Hatch and Mike Lee (Utah); Ted Cruz and John Cornyn (Texas), Lindsey Graham (South Carolina), Jeff Sessions (Alabama), and Jeff Flake (Arizona).

The amendment, as  proposed in Senate Joint Resolution 19, says in Section 1:

Congress shall have power to regulate the raising and spending of money and in-kind equivalents with respect to federal elections, including through setting limits on

1) the amount of contributions to candidates for nomination for election to, or for election to, Federal office; and

(2) the amount of funds that may be spent by, in support of, or in opposition to such candidates.

Section 2 gives the same power to the States. And just as McCain-Feingold exempted media corporations from federal regulation, S.J. Res. 19 states in Section 3: “Nothing in this article shall be construed to grant Congress the power to abridge the freedom of the press.”

Read More:  http://www.thenewamerican.com/

Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2014/07/sen-judiciary-committee-endorses-amendment-abridge-free-speech/#gvBpRLFIsDTxgS5q.99
"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim tribute to patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness -- these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. . . . reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principles."
George Washington

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
Benjamin Franklin

Offline Chieftain

  • AMF, YOYO
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,633
  • Your what hurts??
Re: Sen. Judiciary Committee Endorses Amendment to Abridge Free Speech
« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2014, 09:06:52 AM »
"Congress shall make no law..."


Online Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,123
Re: Sen. Judiciary Committee Endorses Amendment to Abridge Free Speech
« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2014, 09:06:11 PM »
Chieftan wrote above:
[[ "Congress shall make no law..." ]]

Looks like dat is 'bout to go outz da window...

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 28,691
Re: Sen. Judiciary Committee Endorses Amendment to Abridge Free Speech
« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2014, 09:18:46 PM »
Nope.  It won't even pass the Senate.  This is nothing but grandstanding.

They need 67 votes to pass a Constitutional amendment.  Won't even get close.
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Offline DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 32,693
Re: Sen. Judiciary Committee Endorses Amendment to Abridge Free Speech
« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2014, 11:29:52 PM »
Nope.  It won't even pass the Senate.  This is nothing but grandstanding.

They need 67 votes to pass a Constitutional amendment.  Won't even get close.

Thanks for way you add a dose of reality, Sink!   :beer:
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"Journalism is about covering the news.  With a pillow.  Until it stops moving."    - Iowahawk

Online Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 47,155
  • Chief Dork
Re: Sen. Judiciary Committee Endorses Amendment to Abridge Free Speech
« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2014, 12:48:38 AM »
Nope.  It won't even pass the Senate.  This is nothing but grandstanding.

They need 67 votes to pass a Constitutional amendment.  Won't even get close.

And that's before they get to the House, or to ratification by the States.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf