Author Topic: That Study Showing Kids With Same-Sex Parents Fare Better? Yeah, the Media Left a Few Details Out.  (Read 234 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 255,390

That Study Showing Kids With Same-Sex Parents Fare Better? Yeah, the Media Left a Few Details Out.
Katrina Trinko    July 10, 2014 /

There’s been no shortage of media coverage of a new study that purportedly shows that children raised by same-sex partners fare better than other children.

“Children of same-sex couples are happier and healthier than peers, research shows,” was the headline of a Washington Post story. “Largest-ever study of same-sex couples’ kids finds they’re better off than other children,” proclaimed Vox, while announced, “Children of Same-Sex Parents Are Healthier: Study.”

But the actual study is a little more, well, complicated.

In an article published on Public Discourse, University of Texas at Austin professor Mark Regnerus takes issue with the study’s method.

The study, conducted by researchers at the University of Melbourne in Australia, found that “children in same-sex families scored better on a number of key measures of physical health and social well-being than kids from the general population,” according to an article written by one of the researchers on The Conversation.

But the sample surveyed in the study chose to participate. The Melbourne researchers didn’t randomly select the first 500 same-sex couples they found, after checking for sufficient regional/income/educational diversity. Instead, they advertised the study – and couples found the researchers, not vice versa. Furthermore, the couples then reported on how their children were – and no outside party fact-checked those results, or evaluated the children independently.

Talking about the couples who participated in the study, Regnerus sounds this note of caution:

[P]articipants—parents reporting about their children’s lives—are all well aware of the political import of the study topic, and an unknown number of them certainly signed up for that very reason. As a result, it seems unwise to trust their self-reports, given the high risk of “social desirability bias,” or the tendency to portray oneself (or here, one’s children) as better than they actually are.

Ultimately, Regnerus argues, this study’s methodology is so problematic the results aren’t worth taking seriously. He concludes:

Until social scientists decide to do the difficult, expensive work of locating same-sex attracted parents (however defined) through random, population-based sampling strategies—preferably ones that do not “give away” the primary research question(s) up front, as [this study] did—we simply cannot know whether claims like “no differences” or “happier and healthier than” are true, valid, and on target.

It should come as no surprise the news media trumpeted a study with these findings. Unfortunately for readers, flawed reporting on a flawed study does a disservice to everyone.

Support the USO

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 23,836
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
As mentioned on another thread - the study was flawed in a much more serious way, by not confining the control group to heterosexual couples who had their children through IVF or AI.

You go through that - you REALLY want a kid and are more likely to spend the time and effort to maximize their happiness and well being.
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 47,027
  • Dork
geez.  this wasn't a study at all, it was a popularity contest, a one-sided popularity contest.

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo