Author Topic: Obama awaits another court ruling that could deal blow to health law  (Read 267 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 48,595
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Obama awaits another court ruling that could deal blow to health law

By David G. Savage  contact the reporter

Upcoming appeals court ruling could cut off health insurance subsidies for some low-income people

Key ruling on Obamacare could come Tuesday
July 7, 2014, 9:20 AM|Reporting from Washington

President Obama's healthcare law could be dealt a severe blow this week if a U.S. appeals court rules that some low- and middle-income residents no longer qualify to receive promised government subsidies to pay for their health insurance..

The case revolves around a legal glitch in the wording of the Affordable Care Act, which as written says that such subsidies may be paid only if the insurance is purchased through an "exchange established by the state."

That would seem to leave out the 36 states in which the exchanges are operated by the federal government.

A ruling could come as early as Tuesday.

The administration has argued that Congress intended to offer the subsidies nationwide to low-and middle-income people who bought insurance through an exchange, without making a distinction.

Lawyers and congressional staffers who worked on the 2010 law have described the problem as a classic wording glitch in a long and complicated piece of legislation.

Supreme Court, citing religious liberty, limits contraceptive coverage in ObamacareNation NowSupreme Court, citing religious liberty, limits contraceptive coverage in ObamacareSee all relatedí

In one part of the law, it says that states, which normally regulate insurance, could create exchanges that would help consumers and small businesses shop for coverage. The law also said if a state failed to establish an exchange, the federal government could step in and run one in its place.

A second part of the law described the subsidies that could be offered to low- and  middle-income people to cover the cost of the insurance. This part of the law said these subsidies--or tax credits--would be offered for insurance bought on an exchange "established by the state."

Apparently no one noticed the problem until the law was passed. Then, because of fierce political opposition and the 2010 Republican takeover of the House, supporters of the law could not fix the wording through an amendment. Moreover, the administration did not anticipate most Republican-led states would refuse even to create an insurance exchange for their residents.

But the libertarian Competitive Enterprise Institute filed a suit, Halbig vs. Burwell, on behalf of several plaintiffs, contending this regulation is illegal.

They lost in January before a federal judge who decided Congress intended to offer the insurance subsidies to everyone who qualified.

If a panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia rules against Obama -- and the tone of oral arguments suggested it might --  the administration could ask the full 11-member appeals court to weigh the issue.

In the past year, Obama has added four new judges to the D.C. circuit court, giving Democratic appointees a majority for the first time since the mid-1980s.
« Last Edit: July 07, 2014, 05:48:13 PM by rangerrebew »
America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves. Abraham Lincoln

Online Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 41,094
  • SMOD 2016
I cannot believe that there is any issue with this case.  The language is about as clear as legislative language gets, and it unambiguously does not cover exchanges set up by the federal government.
I won't vote for Clinton, but I cannot vote for Trump.  How could I explain to my daughter why I supported a man who sees her as nothing more than a piece of meat, a piece of a$$ for him to grope for his own private pleasure.

"Trump supporter" - the very definition of an SFI

Offline olde north church

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,136
I have never heard the word "glitch" so frequently as in the past, well, since 2009.
Why?  Well, because I'm a bastard, that's why.

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo