Author Topic: Disenchanted Obama Voter: ‘It’s Time For Somebody New … Like Hillary.’  (Read 215 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 70,929
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
- The Daily Caller - -

Disenchanted Obama Voter: ‘It’s Time For Somebody New … Like Hillary.’

Posted By Matt K. Lewis On 2:17 PM 06/18/2014 In Blog - Matt K. Lewis | No Comments

A Wall Street Journal story on President Obama’s falling poll numbers included this quote from a disappointed former Obama voter: ”‘It’s time for somebody new,’ she said, ‘like Hillary.’”

It would be easy to mock such a comment, but the truth is that this is exactly how a lot of voters will respond to Obama’s failures.

Why is this important to acknowledge? It would be easy for Republicans to talk themselves into believing that Obama’s current troubles preordain a Republican victory in 2016 — or that his bad poll numbers constitute a rejection of liberalism.

That would be the best way to blow yet another election.

And that’s not the only trap, either. Someone on Twitter just noted that history suggests Hillary can’t win — since Democrats haven’t won a third consecutive presidential election in many decades (this person at least acknowledged that Al Gore won the popular vote in 2000).

These tidbits are fun for trivia buffs, but I wouldn’t assume that these sort of historical facts are predictive.

Consider this:

… Since 1977, no gubernatorial candidate of the same party as the sitting president had been elected governor of Virginia … until Terry McAuliffe.

… No House Majority Leader had lost a primary since 1899 … until Eric Cantor.

… And, of course, there is the “Redskins rule.”

One could even use this same logic to say that Hillary can’t possibly win the presidency … since no female has ever been elected president before.

The bottom line is that Republicans shouldn’t assume that a rejection of Obama automatically constitutes an acceptance of a Republican candidate as a viable alternative.

And even if it does, that’s hardly a mandate for conservative governance …

Article printed from The Daily Caller:

URL to article:

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim tribute to patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness -- these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. . . . reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principles."
George Washington

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
Benjamin Franklin

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11,633
[[ Disenchanted Obama Voter: ‘It’s Time For Somebody New … Like Hillary.’ ]]


Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 23,836
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
Took the words right off of my keyboard.
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo