Author Topic: Issa to IRS Commissioner: Lerner’s Lawyer Contradicted Your Testimony… Want To Try Again?  (Read 519 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65,740
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
 Daily Caller - http://dailycaller.com -



Issa to IRS Commissioner: Lerner’s Lawyer Contradicted Your Testimony… Want To Try Again?

Posted By Patrick Howley On 1:56 PM 07/02/2014 In | No Comments


House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman Rep. Darrell Issa has told IRS commissioner John Koskinen that his sworn testimony on Lois Lerner’s missing emails was contradicted by recent statements from Lerner’s lawyer, and offered Koskinen a chance to amend his testimony.

“Recent public statements from William W. Taylor III, the attorney representing former IRS official Lois Lerner, have raised new questions about Ms. Lerner’s Federal Records Act compliance practices and the circumstances surrounding the loss of e-mails and destruction of her hard drive,” Issa wrote in a letter Wednesday to Koskinen. “Accordingly, I ask that you assist the Committee in reconciling apparent discrepancies between your claims that Ms. Lerner fully maintained records and statements by her attorney that she did not and that it was not her responsibility.”

Lerner and six other IRS employees allegedly suffered computer crashes that wiped out the emails they sent during the agency’s targeting of conservative groups. The Federal Records Act required Lerner to keep hard copies of her emails. But while Koskinen maintained that Lerner followed the law, Taylor said otherwise.

Koskinen testified on June 23 that “The responsibility is, if you have an email that’s a record, you print it out in hard copy . . .  My understanding is every employee is supposed to print records . . . that are official records on hard copy and keep them.  She had hard copy records.”

But a week later Lerner’s attorney Bill Taylor essentially threw the IRS under the bus to defend his client. Taylor released a series of statements to a Virginia-based publication stating that Lerner did not know she was supposed to comply with federal law.

“Lerner did not print out official records she may have sent over email because she didn’t know she had to,” Taylor said. “If somebody is supposed to keep archived copies, that’s the IT department’s or her staff’s responsibility.”

Issa is giving Koskinen a chance to “amend” his testimony, which appears to have been inaccurate.

“In light of statements by Ms. Lerner’s attorney, including the statement that she did not believe she was ‘required’ to maintain a printed archive of federal record e-mails, as well as the record of correspondence between Ms. Lerner and the Justice Department that the IRS apparently did not maintain, the Committee would like to offer you the opportunity to amend your testimony that you have no idea ‘whether anything that was lost was an official record or not’ and acknowledge that Ms. Lerner did not follow policies necessary for Federal Records Act compliance that have obstructed the congressional investigation into the IRS’s targeting,” Issa wrote.

Follow Patrick on Twitter



Article printed from The Daily Caller: http://dailycaller.com

URL to article: http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/02/issa-to-irs-commissioner-lerners-lawyer-contradicted-your-testimony-want-to-try-again/
Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago

Online Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 45,562
  • #ToldYouSo
What if Koskinen refuses?  Will he be held in contempt of Congress?  Will he suffer consequences?

Online massadvj

  • Editorial Advisor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,111
    • Auktion Online
What if Koskinen refuses?  Will he be held in contempt of Congress?  Will he suffer consequences?

You are the lawyer.  What do you think?

I think this gets ratcheted up considerably after the election.
"She only coughs when she lies."

Online Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 45,562
  • #ToldYouSo
You are the lawyer.  What do you think?

I think this gets ratcheted up considerably after the election.

nothing to do with lawyering and everything to do with politicking and will

Offline GourmetDan

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,158

“Lerner did not print out official records she may have sent over email because she didn’t know she had to,” Taylor said. “If somebody is supposed to keep archived copies, that’s the IT department’s or her staff’s responsibility.”


I'm glad that I only have to comply with the laws and regulations that I know about...


/s
"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left." - Ecclesiastes 10:2

"The sole purpose of the Republican Party is to serve as an ineffective alternative to the Democrat Party." - GourmetDan

Offline xfreeper

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,546
What if Koskinen refuses?  Will he be held in contempt of Congress?  Will he suffer consequences?

Will he suffer consequences? No. Will anyone? No. The perps all know not enough people care enough to result in anything significant. Congress is too busy lining their own pockets and the citizens are too busy with BBQ and following the kardashians

Online andy58-in-nh

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,908
Will he suffer consequences? No. Will anyone? No. The perps all know not enough people care enough to result in anything significant.
 
Congress is too busy lining their own pockets and the citizens are too busy with BBQ and following the kardashians

Sad, but probably true.
 
In a better country, the people would be lining their pockets and barbecuing the Kardashians.
Liberalism isn't really about making the world a better place. It's about reassuring the elites that they are good people for wanting to rule over it.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf