Author Topic: Washington Wants To Regulate ... Everything  (Read 105 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline R4 TrumPence

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,417
Washington Wants To Regulate ... Everything
« on: June 18, 2014, 09:45:11 PM »
Washington Wants To Regulate ... Everything

Regulatory Excess: How much more control does the EPA want over an ostensibly free America? Given that it's set its sights on rain-swelled ditches and soggy gullies, it seems there are no limits to its confiscatory ambition.
Under the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency have authority over the navigable waters of the U.S. But apparently that isn't enough for this administration. It wants more private land to fall under federal control.
Both the EPA, which has launched the Obama administration's war on coal, and the Army Corps of Engineers want to expand the definition of waters that would be under their regulatory boot. It looks like a scheme that will give them dominion over anything that's already wet — and anything that might become so. We don't exaggerate the plan's potential intrusiveness.
"The EPA is proposing that puddles, ponds, ditches, ephemerals and isolated wetlands fall under the Clean Water Act and expand the regulatory authority to the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers," the Journal Gazette & Times Courier, which serves an agricultural community in Illinois, reported last week.
On Friday, Iowa Farmer Today noted that under the agencies' proposal, "any area of your field or yard that may see standing water, even if it's for a short period, could be considered navigable waters subject to federal jurisdiction."
What, then, would be the practical effects of such an arrangement? Craig Hill, president of the Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, has thought that through.
"No matter that your back yard or field was dry seven days a week for the past 20 years, if a 5-inch rainfall suddenly left a puddle or a slowing stream, the EPA, according to this new 370-page 'rule,' might consider it 'navigable' or a Waters of the U.S.," Hill explained in Iowa Farmer Today.
"That means you would have to ask the federal agencies to find out if it's 'navigable' or apply for federal permits — working through additional government red tape to build a terrace in your field, construct a waterway, apply fertilizer, or even plant a tree on your land.
"Want to build a fence or spray for weeds? Now, you'll need a federal permit! What's more, you could be subjected to a $37,500-per-day fine if you're not in compliance."
A government that already owns 28% to 30% of America's 2.27 billion acres — and 52% of Western lands — doesn't need to control more. Yet here is Washington wanting to put more soil under its command.

Read More At Investor's Business Daily:

I am Repub4Bush on FR '02

Offline andy58-in-nh

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,010
Re: Washington Wants To Regulate ... Everything
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2014, 10:30:32 PM »
Given the support of one American political party for unrestrained fascism and the silent complicity of the other, the only reasonable way to stop this nonsense is passive resistance by those affected. Stop obeying unconstitutional laws and regulations.

Refuse to comply, or to pay fines.  Flood the courts with cases, fill the prisons with "violators" and overwhelm the system they have created. Force the enemies of freedom to show the real guns behind their phony caring and compassion. Use their Cloward-Piven strategy against them, and dare to sit at the Progressive version of the "Whites-Only" lunch counter. Make them use their fire hoses to keep the ...... down.

Because that's exactly what we are to the Ruling Class in Washington: Uppity N words. 
Why has Trump done scores of interviews on Fox and virtually nowhere else the last two months? Because he’s not interested in winning over undecideds, independents, or swing voters — you know the sort of thing serious presidential candidates do. No, he’s reselling the same product to people who’ve already bought it so he can take the customers with him after the election.

Liberalism isn't really about making the world a better place. It's about reassuring the elites that they are good people for want

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo