Author Topic: Nevada Democrats pick ‘None of these candidates’ for governor  (Read 185 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 19,840
  • Itchy yet?
And the winner is -- no one.

More Democratic primary voters cast ballots for "None of these candidates" than for any actual ones in Tuesday's nominating contest for governor in Nevada, a testament to a weak field looking to challenge popular Gov. Brian Sandoval (R) and a unique Nevada election law that allows voters the none-of-the-above option.

With all precincts reporting, "None" led the way with 30 percent of the vote, according to an unofficial tally from the Associated Press. Finishing second was former state economic development director Robert Goodman, who won 25 percent of the vote.

Goodman will be the nominee because state law reads, "Only votes cast for the named candidates shall be counted in determining nomination or election to any statewide office or presidential nominations or the selection of presidential electors."

Sandoval easily won renomination and will be a substantial favorite in the fall.

The "None" option in Nevada dates back to the 1970s. In the wake of the Watergate scandal, the option was offered to counteract apathy about governance and politicians. It survived a court challenge earlier this year.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/06/11/nevada-democrats-pick-none-of-these-candidates-for-governor/
Anyone who tells you you can't buy happiness has never been in a book store or an animal shelter.

You are the result of 3 billion years of evolutionary success. Act like it.

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,336
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Re: Nevada Democrats pick ‘None of these candidates’ for governor
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2014, 02:52:05 PM »
I've been saying for 2 decades that "none of the above" is the only way Americans have left to express their displeasure with the power mongers in the Politburo. :hands:  I think FEDERAL ELECTIONS should have that option.  I'll bet it would take a Constitutional Amendment to get it enacted, though.  You know the politburo would treat this with less respect that they treat the TEA Party. :politics:
There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.
Public virtue cannot exist in a nation without private, and public virtue is the only foundation of republics. There must be a positive passion for the public good, the public interest, honour, power and glory, established in the minds of the people, or there can be no republican government, nor any real liberty: and this public passion must be superior to all private passions. John Adams


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf