Author Topic: When Conservatives Play the Purification Game  (Read 226 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Once-Ler

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,577
  • How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Trump
When Conservatives Play the Purification Game
« on: June 07, 2014, 05:53:59 AM »
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2014/06/05/when-conservatives-play-the-purification-game/

In a recent New York Times profile of former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, we read this:

“There is skepticism that maybe Jeb Bush wants too much government in people’s lives,” said Greg Mueller, a Republican strategist who has advised the president campaigns of Pat Buchanan, Steve Forbes and Bob Dole. “I don’t know that he will ever win over the limited-government conservative.”

I want to address the comments by Mr. Mueller for two (related) reasons, the first having to do with the Bush record and the second having to do with a somewhat troubling mindset among some on the right. Let me take them in order, starting with Bush’s record as governor of Florida.

Jeb Bush was not only a very popular two-term governor; he was also among the most successful and conservative governors in decades. That is true if one is talking about his record on taxes, where he cut taxes every year he was governor (a period covering eight years and totaling nearly $20 billion). It’s true if one is talking about Bush’s fiscal record, where he reduced the number of state government employees, kept state government spending growth lower than personal income growth, vetoed over $2.5 billion in new spending initiatives, and even won high marks, particularly in his first term, from the libertarian Cato Institute. (Bush’s spending in his second term went up in part because Florida was hit by eight hurricanes in less than two years.)

Governor Bush instituted medical liability reforms that capped non-economic damages; overhauled and modernized Florida’s civil service system, including allowing state workers to be terminated for cause; did away with quotas and preferential pricing advantages in procurement and eliminated race or ethnic advantages in admissions policies; and championed an overhaul of Medicaid that allowed beneficiaries to choose from a menu of private insurance options rather than force them into a centrally managed public system. He was a strong advocate of school choice and charter schools, enacted tough standards, required testing of all students, and graded all schools. As a result of these accountability steps, his state experienced a dramatic increase in student achievement, with Florida students well outpacing national average increases in standardized test scores. Bush’s record also includes Florida’s bond rating being upgraded to the highest possible grade (AAA) and the greatest job creation in the country during the time he served as governor.

I cite Bush’s record at length not to convince anyone he should be the GOP presidential nominee in 2016 (especially since he may not run). It’s to illustrate why the idea that he should alarm limited-government conservatives strikes me as not just unpersuasive but unserious. As a point of comparison: Bush’s record in two terms as governor was in many key areas more conservative than Ronald Reagan’s record in two terms as governor. Two examples: Under Reagan, spending in California rose from an annual budget of $4.6 billion to $10.2 billion – an increase of more than 120 percent. Mr. Reagan also signed into law what his biographer Lou Cannon called “the largest tax hike ever proposed by any governor in the history of the United States”–one four times as large as the previous record set by Governor Pat Brown. (Even those on the right who fault Governor Bush for his stand on immigration have to deal with the fact that, as president, Reagan spoke out in defense of the idea of amnesty, saying, “I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and who have lived here even though some time back they may have entered illegally.” President Reagan also signed into law legislation that granted amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants.)

What if Greg Mueller (or those whose views he claims to be describing) applied to Reagan the standard he’s applying to Bush? The greatest conservative politician in the 20th century and one of the greatest presidents in American history would have been deemed a RINO, unprincipled, in favor of far too much government in people’s lives, and unable to win over limited-government conservative.

This is the problem when conservatives engage in a purification game. To be sure, public officials should be judged by their record and in the totality of their acts. But it’s unwise, and deeply un-conservative, to judge lawmakers against some mythical standard of perfection. It was Reagan himself who warned against those who want to go over the cliff with all flags waiving.

It’s important that those of us on the right resist falling into lazy habits; that we avoid the trap of paying less attention to reforms and measurable achievements than we do to fierce anti-government rhetoric. It’s easier to bemoan government’s role in education than it is to institute reforms that actually improve education.

At this stage in the political process it’s perfectly appropriate for people to analyze the records and the strengths and weaknesses of potential presidential nominees. And for a variety of reasons, we are drawn to some politicians more than others. But those who believe someone with Jeb Bush’s record is somehow suspect on conservative grounds are entering a world detached from reality and injurious to conservatism.
"Racism is evil. And those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans."  -  President Donald J Trump

Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!.....
...They have been in our country for many years through no fault of their own - brought in by parents at young age. Plus BIG border security
       Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump 5:35 AM - Sep 14, 2017

Offline speekinout

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,337
Re: When Conservatives Play the Purification Game
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2014, 02:20:58 PM »
Quote
It’s important that those of us on the right resist falling into lazy habits; that we avoid the trap of paying less attention to reforms and measurable achievements than we do to fierce anti-government rhetoric. It’s easier to bemoan government’s role in education than it is to institute reforms that actually improve education.

 :amen:

(And not just about education - the same should be said about any issue)

Online truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,803
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
    • The place where argument addicts can go
Re: When Conservatives Play the Purification Game
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2014, 02:41:45 PM »
The definition of "conservative" has changed since Goldwater and Reagan's times.

1964-1989 (Nixon, Reagan were elected)

1989-2014 (Bush, Bush II were elected)

2014+ (?)

"God must love the common man, he made so many of them.”

Abe Lincoln

Offline Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 47,023
  • Dork
Re: When Conservatives Play the Purification Game
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2014, 09:32:51 PM »
Based on the article, Jeb Bush would be an awesome budget advisor.  In isolation, without reference to history, he might be a good president.  But we can't take things in isolation, and history exists, no matter how much one might want to deny it.  If the GOP wanted a President Jeb Bush then it should have run him rather than his brother Geo. W.  But they didn't, they ran, and elected, GWB.  And that historical fact, plus the historical fact of President GHWB means that there will not be a President Jeb Bush in 2016 or 2020.  Not even the Adamses got 3 in, and they were both better presidents than GHWB or GWB, and most likely better than a putative President Jeb Bush.

It's absolutely flabbergasting how ahistorical the GOP leadership are.  Like Charlie Brown and that infamous football, they aren't ignorant of history, they simply believe, against all odds (and common sense), that it won't happen this time.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf