Author Topic: TEXAS DEPUTY: PHOTOGRAPHY SUSPICIOUS IN ‘POST 9/11′ AMERICA  (Read 258 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65,717
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
- The Daily Sheeple - http://www.thedailysheeple.com -



TEXAS DEPUTY: PHOTOGRAPHY SUSPICIOUS IN ‘POST 9/11′ AMERICA

Posted By Contributing Author On June 6, 2014 @ 8:30 pm In Controlling the Herd,Crime/Police State,Editor's Choice,Featured,News,Police State,Videos and Media | 1 Comment


Cop911IW [1]

“Your refusing to tell me where you’re from and post 9/11 that concerns me”

A video uploaded to YouTube this week shows a photographer in Pampa, Texas being detained for “suspicious activity” while legally filming a police stop from a public sidewalk.



The video begins by showing a Pampa police officer approaching a photographer as he attempts to test out a new camera.

As the officer begins asking personal questions, the photographer remains relatively tight lipped, opting to continue his legal activity.

Shortly after, as the traffic stop come to an end, the photographer is approached by a Deputy Stokes, who immediately attempts to confiscate all photography equipment for “evidence.”

Unable to provide which law allows for confiscation, Stokes, now clearly upset, resorts to assaulting the photographer.

Stokes continues by telling the photographer that his filming is a “violation” despite no law supporting his claim.

Attempting to get ID, Stokes continues to claim the legal authority to detain the photographer for filming despite the action being repeatedly upheld by the Supreme Court [2].


“You can’t go around recording us!” Stokes incorrectly claims.

Interestingly, the mood of the encounter begins to shift as as the photographer mentions his intention to sue Stokes for assault. Stokes responds by completely changing his earlier statements, now threatening a subpoena instead of confiscation.


“Let me just explain to you my concerns,” Stokes says as he again attempts to stifle the photographer’s First Amendment. “My concern is this is not the first traffic stop that you’ve photographed tonight, it’s not the first one you’ve video-taped tonight. Your refusing to tell me where you’re from and in post 9/11 that concerns me.”

While most photographers expect to be engaged while filming police in public, the issue arises when officers use threats and unjust detainment to curtail legal activity. Countlessfederal training manuals [3] that paint photography as likely terrorism have only compounded the issue.

Just last May, a citizen journalist in Albany, New York was visited and questioned by a member of the Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) and asked if he belonged to a “domestic terrorist group” for legally photographing buildings at the local police academy.


“It is personally insulting and offensive to me that I would be associated with the Sovereign Citizen movement merely for exercising my constitutional rights,” photographer Matthew Grunert toldInfowars [4].

The exhaustively used excuse of 9/11 rings hollow in light of terrorism statistics [5] and facts. Just last year, President Obama waived a federal law [6] designed to stop the US from arming terrorists in order to provide military support to the Al-Qaeda aligned [7] “Syrian rebels.”

Libyan rebel leader Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, who was supported by the Obama administration in 2011, told media that Al Qaeda members who admitted to killing US troops in Iraq were among his ranks. [8] As expected, covert support [9] for the group only increased.

Despite this, innocent Americans continued to be harassed, surveilled and scrutinized for completely legal activity.

(H/T: Photographyisnotacrime.com [10])

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple [11]


Contributed by Mikael Thalen of Infowars [12].


Article printed from The Daily Sheeple: http://www.thedailysheeple.com

URL to article: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/texas-deputy-photography-suspicious-in-post-911%e2%80%b2-america_062014

URLs in this post:

[1] Image: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/texas-deputy-photography-suspicious-in-post-911%e2%80%b2-america_062014/cop911iw

[2] upheld by the Supreme Court: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-supreme-court-rejects-plea-to-prohibit-taping-of-police-20121126,0,686331.story

[3] federal training manuals: http://www.infowars.com/nsi-instructional-video-public-photography-is-terrorism/

[4] Infowars: http://www.infowars.com/citizen-journalist-visited-by-joint-terrorism-task-force-for-filming-police-building/

[5] terrorism statistics: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/04/statistics-you-are-not-going-to-be-killed-by-terrorists.html

[6] President Obama waived a federal law: http://washingtonexaminer.com/updated-obama-waives-ban-on-arming-terrorists-to-allow-aid-to-syrian-opposition/article/2535885

[7] Al-Qaeda aligned: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/i-am-not-fighting-againstalqaida-itsnot-our-problem-says-wests-last-hope-in-syria-9233424.html?printService=print

[8] told media that Al Qaeda members who admitted to killing US troops in Iraq were among his ranks.: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8407047/Libyan-rebel-commander-admits-his-fighters-have-al-Qaeda-links.html

[9] covert support: http://abcnews.go.com/International/president-obama-authorizes-covert-libyan-rebels/story?id=13259028

[10] Photographyisnotacrime.com: http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/06/05/texas-deputy-assaults-videographer-blames-911/

[11] The Daily Sheeple: http://www.TheDailySheeple.com/

[12] Infowars: http://www.infowars.com/texas-deputy-photography-suspicious-in-post-911-america/
Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago

Offline Atomic Cow

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,235
  • High Yield Minion
Re: TEXAS DEPUTY: PHOTOGRAPHY SUSPICIOUS IN ‘POST 9/11′ AMERICA
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2014, 02:41:38 PM »
Nothing new about this.  Cops have been using 9/11 as a weapon against all kinds of photographers since 9-12-01.  Run across some fascist cop/TSA/rent-a-cop at an airport who is on a power trip, and they'll go nuts if they see you with a camera taking pictures.

I know numerous photographers who have been detained and arrested (always freed later) for taking pictures of airplanes.  One even had his jaw broken by some Chicago cops for taking pictures from private property near O'Hare.  I myself got detained by a national guardsman and held at gunpoint by his M-16 in 2002.

For the record, there is no federal law or regulation of taking pictures at or near airports, except for the TSA regulation against taking pictures of the security checkpoints.  However, there are some local laws which prohibit it depending on the location.
"...And these atomic bombs which science burst upon the world that night were strange, even to the men who used them."  H. G. Wells, The World Set Free, 1914

"The one pervading evil of democracy is the tyranny of the majority, or rather of that party, not always the majority, that succeeds, by force or fraud, in carrying elections." -Lord Acton

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65,717
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Re: TEXAS DEPUTY: PHOTOGRAPHY SUSPICIOUS IN ‘POST 9/11′ AMERICA
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2014, 02:51:16 PM »
Apparently being a Christian, being a military veteran, believing in the Constitution, and being patriotic are "suspicious since 9/11.  Or maybe that is from the day Obama was sworn in as POTUS.
Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf