Author Topic: White House Can’t Agree: Susan Rice Calls Bergdahl ‘Hostage,’ Carney Says He’s Not  (Read 140 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 255,475

White House Can’t Agree: Susan Rice Calls Bergdahl ‘Hostage,’ Carney Says He’s Not
Posted By Brendan Bordelon On 4:21 PM 06/02/2014 In | No Comments

The Obama administration is struggling to explain how their deal to release five top-ranking Taliban in exchange for captured Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl does not violate the U.S. prohibition on negotiating with terrorists, splitting hairs and contradicting one another in deliberations over whether Bergdahl was a “hostage” or a “prisoner of war.”

On Sunday, White House national security advisor Susan Rice appeared on ABC’s “This Week” to explain why the trade does not mean America is now open to negotiating with terrorist groups.

“This is a very special situation,” she told George Stephanopoulos. “Sgt. Bergdahl wasn’t simply a hostage, he was an American prisoner of war captured on the battlefield. We have a sacred obligation that we have upheld since the founding of our republic to do our utmost to bring back our men and women who were taken in battle. And we did that in this instance.”

Leaving aside the growing probability that Bergdahl was not “taken in battle,” but instead deserted his post, Rice seems to be arguing that his status as a prisoner of war trumps his status as a terrorist hostage, thus transforming the Taliban and their terrorist allies in the Haqqani Network into legitimate partners in negotiation.

White House press secretary Jay Carney doubled down on that characterization this morning, even contradicting Rice by refusing to identify Bergdahl as a “hostage” altogether.

“Why parse words and have the secretary of defense say, ‘We didn’t negotiate with terrorists?’” CNN’s Chris Cuomo asked Carney.

“The fact is he was held in an armed conflict by the Taliban, we were engaged in an armed conflict with the Taliban,” Carney shot back, “and we have a history in this country of making sure that our prisoners of war are returned to us. We don’t leave them behind.”

“He was not a hostage, he was a prisoner,” Carney added.

Support the USO

Offline Chieftain

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,633
  • Your what hurts??
Two points just made on Special Report. 

Dana Perino believes this was the first shot of how Obama will close Gitmo.  Rich Lowry thinks Susan Rice is the one selling the idea that Gitmo is the biggest National security threat we have, and by releasing the "Taliban's Dream Team" is starts a process where in the end if there are no prisoners in Gitmo, Gitmo can easily be closed.

Susan Rice, once again.

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo