Author Topic: DHS Sec: Don’t Enforce Immigration Law In Courthouses  (Read 211 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 69,335
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
DHS Sec: Don’t Enforce Immigration Law In Courthouses
« on: May 30, 2014, 05:42:29 AM »
DHS Sec: Don’t Enforce Immigration Law In Courthouses

Posted By Tristyn Bloom On 4:59 PM 05/29/2014 In | No Comments

Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson thinks courthouses should be “immigration enforcement-free zones,” reports the Washington Times.

“Courthouses are special,” he said in testimony before Congress Thursday, meaning that the government ought not target illegal immigrants who may be there–a status already granted to schools, hospitals, and places of worship. (RELATED: Immigration Enforcement Isn’t Smart, Obama Says)

The issue came up during the House Judiciary Committee’s Homeland Security Department Oversight hearing when Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) asked Johnson whether he thought courthouses ought be added to this list of “sensitive locations.”

“People have been apprehended by ICE when they went to the courthouse to pay a traffic ticket, to answer criminal charges, or to obtain a protective order. In one case a person was detained when he appeared in court to get married,” Nadler said. The ability to appear at courthouses is “essential for the protection of our constitutional rights,” and the spate of courthouse “enforcement actions” in recent months will intimidate immigrants and prevent them conducting important civic duties, he argued.

Johnson said he was “a little surprised” courthouses weren’t already considered sensitive locations and agreed that there ought be “a special policy.”

Follow Tristyn on Twitter.

Article printed from The Daily Caller:

URL to article:

Constitutions are not designed for metaphysical or logical subtleties, for niceties of expression, for critical propriety, for elaborate shades of meaning, or for the exercise of philosophical acuteness or judicial research. They are instruments of a practical nature, founded on the common business of human life, adapted to common wants, designed for common use, and fitted for common understandings.

Joseph Story

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo