Author Topic: Government Agency Scraps Employee Ratings To Avoid ‘Discrimination’  (Read 180 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 69,510
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Government Agency Scraps Employee Ratings To Avoid ‘Discrimination’

Posted By Scott Greer On 11:40 PM 05/25/2014 In | No Comments

One government agency has decided that the results of employee ratings are too discriminatory and eliminated the process entirely. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced on Monday that it will now award all employees the highest rating regardless of performance reviews.

The CFPB, which oversees transactions in the financial sector for the federal government, came to its conclusion to no longer conduct employee reviews because there were just too many apparent “significant disparities” between the races, ages, and locations of its employees.

According to American Banker, this new policy is set to cost over $5 million dollars as it will now pay employees as if they received the highest evaluation score. The previous system ranked staff on their performance from a scale ranging from 1 to 5, with 5 being the best score a CFPB staffer could receive after a review of his or her work on the job.

This development comes right before the agency is scheduled for a Wednesday hearing to investigate allegations that it practiced retaliatory actions towards certain employees. News reports have circulated that the alleged “discriminations” were race-based and that the CFPB implemented their new policies to alleviate that problem.

The CFPB’s director Richard Cordray explained in a staff email that the change was apparently not related to the previous race-based allegations.

“”We have determined that there were broad-based disparities in the way performance ratings were assigned across our employee base in both 2012 and 2013,” Cordray stated in the email. “These differences indicate a systemic disadvantage to various categories of employees that persisted across divisions, offices, and other employee characteristics.”

Some have found this new policy to be misguided and believe it to be an overcorrection that will ultimately punish top performers in the department.

“Treating the agency’s highest-rated employees the same as its lowest-rated ones is the opposite of fairness. Hard-working, conscientious workers (and, yes, the federal government does have those) deserve to be treated better and paid more than workers who, say, persistently show up late and turn in shoddy work,” Thomas Brown, a columnist for, wrote in a Wednesday piece lambasting the decision.

“Instead, in its pathetic bow to political correctness, the slackers are being rewarded. Worse, Cordray seems oblivious to the fact that he’s giving his most valuable workers the shaft,” Brown continued.

Follow Scott on Twitter

Article printed from The Daily Caller:

URL to article:

Constitutions are not designed for metaphysical or logical subtleties, for niceties of expression, for critical propriety, for elaborate shades of meaning, or for the exercise of philosophical acuteness or judicial research. They are instruments of a practical nature, founded on the common business of human life, adapted to common wants, designed for common use, and fitted for common understandings.

Joseph Story

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo