« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR  (Read 9041 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Politics4us

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 506
John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« on: May 23, 2014, 08:37:05 pm »
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3159324/posts

Jim Robinson allows almost daily attacks on Mark Levin from John W K, even though Levin has contributed money to FR and is a respected conservative, yet Jim Robinson banned people during the 2012 presidential election for saying that they would support Mitt Romney. Idiot.
Logged

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,567
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2014, 09:50:17 pm »
So?  Is Levin off-limits? 

Does he still cut people off and call them "jerks"?  He and Savage are two of the rudest people in talk-radio, unless the caller is kissing his ass.
Logged
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,804
  • Gender: Male
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2014, 09:56:03 pm »
Never seen Levin's appeal. He writes a good stick, but his show is dire.
Logged
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,386
  • Gender: Male
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2014, 10:07:33 pm »
I would not ban Levin's positions, writings from FR or elsewhere.

I find his position regarding updating and modifying our Constitution to be largely a self-serving vehicle to sell books, with a "hook."
Logged
"God must love the common man, he made so many of them.�  Abe Lincoln

Offline Politics4us

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 506
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2014, 10:09:57 pm »
Quote from: sinkspur on May 23, 2014, 09:50:17 pm
So?  Is Levin off-limits? 

Does he still cut people off and call them "jerks"?  He and Savage are two of the rudest people in talk-radio, unless the caller is kissing his ass.

You are missing the point, and I know you're a Republican establishment hack who is annoyed by Levin. I said Levin is a respected conservative leader who has contributed to FR, and for Jim to ban people who he disagrees with, while allowing John W K to attack Levin with daily threads is ridiculous.
Logged

Offline Politics4us

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 506
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2014, 10:10:34 pm »
Quote from: EC on May 23, 2014, 09:56:03 pm
Never seen Levin's appeal. He writes a good stick, but his show is dire.

His show is entertaining, and he's smart and knowledgeable.
Logged

Offline Politics4us

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 506
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #6 on: May 23, 2014, 10:10:58 pm »
Quote from: truth_seeker on May 23, 2014, 10:07:33 pm
I would not ban Levin's positions, writings from FR or elsewhere.


?
Logged

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,804
  • Gender: Male
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #7 on: May 23, 2014, 10:23:04 pm »
Quote from: Politics4us on May 23, 2014, 10:10:34 pm
His show is entertaining, and he's smart and knowledgeable.

Maybe I have been unlucky with the streams I have caught. It's possible. But he lectures too much for my taste.
Logged
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #8 on: May 23, 2014, 10:32:03 pm »
He (John W K) actually calls Levin's Liberty Amendments Socialist here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3158989/posts

Looking through his articles, he has a few screws loose. He strikes me as one of those who try to make the argument a court is illegal because the flag has gold fringe on it. He copies and pastes various blocks of text but it seems he really doesn't understand much of what he is saying or just doesn't read it all. He actually claims here no where in the 16th Amendment is income taxes mentioned:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3154540/posts

Quote from the 16th Amendment to set him straight:
Quote
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

He also has a habit of personally attacking Jenny Beth Martin (is he her ex or something?)
Example:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3149888/posts
« Last Edit: May 23, 2014, 10:40:32 pm by AbaraXas »
Logged

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,567
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #9 on: May 23, 2014, 10:58:57 pm »
Quote from: Politics4us on May 23, 2014, 10:09:57 pm
You are missing the point, and I know you're a Republican establishment hack who is annoyed by Levin. I said Levin is a respected conservative leader who has contributed to FR, and for Jim to ban people who he disagrees with, while allowing John W K to attack Levin with daily threads is ridiculous.

You're new here.  I'm not "Republican establishment" though the Tea Partiers like to pigeon-hole conservatives who disagree with them with that moniker.

Maybe Jim sees through Levin's self-serving ideas, such as his dreamland "Liberty Amendments," which, as someone has already said, is nothing but a blatant pandering to his thronesniffers to buy his book.
Logged
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Offline truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,386
  • Gender: Male
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #10 on: May 23, 2014, 11:35:34 pm »
Quote from: Politics4us on May 23, 2014, 10:10:58 pm

?
I would not ban Levin or his attackers.

You would ban Levin's attackers? If so, how FR of you.

Logged
"God must love the common man, he made so many of them.�  Abe Lincoln

Offline johnwk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 94
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #11 on: February 06, 2018, 04:49:35 pm »
Quote from: AbaraXas on May 23, 2014, 10:32:03 pm
He (John W K) actually calls Levin's Liberty Amendments Socialist here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3158989/posts

Looking through his articles, he has a few screws loose. He strikes me as one of those who try to make the argument a court is illegal because the flag has gold fringe on it. He copies and pastes various blocks of text but it seems he really doesn't understand much of what he is saying or just doesn't read it all. He actually claims here no where in the 16th Amendment is income taxes mentioned:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3154540/posts

Quote from the 16th Amendment to set him straight:
He also has a habit of personally attacking Jenny Beth Martin (is he her ex or something?)
Example:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3149888/posts

Now that you have attacked me, how about addressing what I have actually posted.  Quote my words and then post your objections.

In regard to Mark Levin's "liberty amendments", e.g. his balanced budget amendment, it would actually make it constitutional for Congress to not extinguish deficiencies with an apportioned direct tax as our Founder's intended.  In fact, his amendment would make it constitutional for Congress to not balance the budget on an annual basis.


JWK




Without a Fifth Column Media, Yellow Journalism and a corrupted FBI, Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, would be making license tags in a federal penitentiary

   
Logged

Offline INVAR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,961
  • Gender: Male
  • Dread To Tread
    • Sword At The Ready
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #12 on: February 06, 2018, 05:04:34 pm »
Quote from: Politics4us on May 23, 2014, 10:09:57 pm
I said Levin is a respected conservative leader who has contributed to FR, and for Jim to ban people who he disagrees with, while allowing John W K to attack Levin with daily threads is ridiculous.

There is a reason there are a whole lot of former Freepers on this board that no longer have anything to do with that board, either by the hand of JR and his Mods or our own, having realized that board devolved into toxicity.

JR can ban whomever he wants for whatever reason he likes, all it does is grow our membership here.

Who cares if it is ridiculous?  We have a new home to call our own and invest our time and money.
Logged
Fart for freedom, fart for liberty and fart proudly.  - Benjamin Franklin

...Obsta principiis—Nip the shoots of arbitrary power in the bud, is the only maxim which can ever preserve the liberties of any people. When the people give way, their deceivers, betrayers and destroyers press upon them so fast that there is no resisting afterwards. The nature of the encroachment upon [the] American constitution is such, as to grow every day more and more encroaching. Like a cancer, it eats faster and faster every hour." - John Adams, February 6, 1775

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #13 on: February 06, 2018, 05:14:40 pm »
Who the hell started this thread up about some insignificant nobody? If you leased a car when this thread began in '14, it would be time to turn it in now.

Logged

Offline WingNot

  • Resident TBR Curmudgeon
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,659
  • Gender: Male
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #14 on: February 06, 2018, 05:17:31 pm »
Holy bad acid trip flashback Batman....
Logged
"I'm a man, but I changed, because I had to. Oh well."

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #15 on: February 06, 2018, 05:20:50 pm »
Quote from: johnwk on February 06, 2018, 04:49:35 pm
Now that you have attacked me, how about addressing what I have actually posted.  Quote my words and then post your objections.

In regard to Mark Levin's "liberty amendments", e.g. his balanced budget amendment, it would actually make it constitutional for Congress to not extinguish deficiencies with an apportioned direct tax as our Founder's intended.  In fact, his amendment would make it constitutional for Congress to not balance the budget on an annual basis.


JWK




Without a Fifth Column Media, Yellow Journalism and a corrupted FBI, Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, would be making license tags in a federal penitentiary



Now???   Dude.... that was over three years ago.   WTF?  Are you a Sagittarius, perchance (better late then never)?

Logged
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,986
  • Gender: Female
  • Ex-member
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #16 on: February 06, 2018, 05:28:58 pm »
How odd.

So, are you still attacking Levin? 
Logged

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #17 on: February 06, 2018, 05:30:12 pm »
Quote from: johnwk on February 06, 2018, 04:49:35 pm
Now that you have attacked me, how about addressing what I have actually posted.  Quote my words and then post your objections.

In regard to Mark Levin's "liberty amendments", e.g. his balanced budget amendment, it would actually make it constitutional for Congress to not extinguish deficiencies with an apportioned direct tax as our Founder's intended.  In fact, his amendment would make it constitutional for Congress to not balance the budget on an annual basis.


JWK




Without a Fifth Column Media, Yellow Journalism and a corrupted FBI, Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, would be making license tags in a federal penitentiary



Did you read the book or just the Salon opinions on it.

Please show how exactly the requirement for Congress to not spend more than it takes in is as bad as you vaguely hint that it is.
Logged
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #18 on: February 06, 2018, 05:32:53 pm »
Quote from: AbaraXas on May 23, 2014, 10:32:03 pm
He (John W K) actually calls Levin's Liberty Amendments Socialist here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3158989/posts

Looking through his articles, he has a few screws loose. He strikes me as one of those who try to make the argument a court is illegal because the flag has gold fringe on it. He copies and pastes various blocks of text but it seems he really doesn't understand much of what he is saying or just doesn't read it all. He actually claims here no where in the 16th Amendment is income taxes mentioned:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3154540/posts

Quote from the 16th Amendment to set him straight:
He also has a habit of personally attacking Jenny Beth Martin (is he her ex or something?)
Example:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3149888/posts

@AbaraXas

One of the first discussions I ever got into over at FR was with people that have this warped mentality.

They also tried to claim the military in it's current form is illegal too.

He should be a fun one.
Logged
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!

Offline johnwk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 94
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #19 on: February 06, 2018, 05:34:39 pm »
Quote from: XenaLee on February 06, 2018, 05:20:50 pm
Now???   Dude.... that was over three years ago.   WTF?  Are you a Sagittarius, perchance (better late then never)?

I happened to come across this forum in which a poster attacked me instead of what I posted.  I was hoping the poster would elaborate on the comments made.

I'm not sure why you have a problem with that.

JWK

There was a time not too long ago in New York when the able-bodied were ashamed to accept home relief, a program created by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1931 when he was Governor. Now, New York City and many other major cities are infested with countless government cheese factions from **** hole countries, who not only demand welfare, but use it to buy beer, wine, drugs, sex, and Lotto tickets.

Logged

Offline johnwk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 94
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #20 on: February 06, 2018, 05:39:39 pm »
Quote from: Sanguine on February 06, 2018, 05:28:58 pm
How odd.

So, are you still attacking Levin?

Calling into question a position he takes is attacking him?  If it makes any difference to you, I also applauded him for pointing out the fraudulent nature of a proposed balanced budget amendment concocted in the House.

JWJ
Logged

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #21 on: February 06, 2018, 05:39:46 pm »
Quote from: johnwk on February 06, 2018, 05:34:39 pm
I happened to come across this forum in which a poster attacked me instead of what I posted.  I was hoping the poster would elaborate on the comments made.

I'm not sure why you have a problem with that.

JWK

There was a time not too long ago in New York when the able-bodied were ashamed to accept home relief, a program created by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1931 when he was Governor. Now, New York City and many other major cities are infested with countless government cheese factions from **** hole countries, who not only demand welfare, but use it to buy beer, wine, drugs, sex, and Lotto tickets.


Got bored and Googled your screen name didn't you?

It's ok we all do it.
Logged
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #22 on: February 06, 2018, 05:41:40 pm »
Quote from: johnwk on February 06, 2018, 05:39:39 pm
Calling into question a position he takes is attacking him?  If it makes any difference to you, I also applauded him for pointing out the fraudulent nature of a proposed balanced budget amendment concocted in the House.

JWJ

Hate to break it to you...but you attacked him...repeatedly.

Oh and the Liberty Amendments are so far away from Socialist they aren't even on the same Continent.
Logged
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 382,830
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #23 on: February 06, 2018, 05:43:55 pm »
Quote from: johnwk on February 06, 2018, 05:34:39 pm
I happened to come across this forum in which a poster attacked me instead of what I posted.  I was hoping the poster would elaborate on the comments made.

I'm not sure why you have a problem with that.

JWK

There was a time not too long ago in New York when the able-bodied were ashamed to accept home relief, a program created by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1931 when he was Governor. Now, New York City and many other major cities are infested with countless government cheese factions from **** hole countries, who not only demand welfare, but use it to buy beer, wine, drugs, sex, and Lotto tickets.


Welcome to TBR...this thread was several years ago..I don't even remember it...
Logged
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline WingNot

  • Resident TBR Curmudgeon
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,659
  • Gender: Male
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #24 on: February 06, 2018, 05:46:14 pm »
A new troll to play with.  Thanks Mom.

Quote from: mystery-ak on February 06, 2018, 05:43:55 pm
Welcome to TBR...this thread was several years ago..I don't even remember it...
Logged
"I'm a man, but I changed, because I had to. Oh well."
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »