Author Topic: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR  (Read 496 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Politics4us

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 506
John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« on: May 23, 2014, 04:37:05 PM »
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3159324/posts

Jim Robinson allows almost daily attacks on Mark Levin from John W K, even though Levin has contributed money to FR and is a respected conservative, yet Jim Robinson banned people during the 2012 presidential election for saying that they would support Mitt Romney. Idiot.

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 28,599
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2014, 05:50:17 PM »
So?  Is Levin off-limits? 

Does he still cut people off and call them "jerks"?  He and Savage are two of the rudest people in talk-radio, unless the caller is kissing his ass.
From  "A Shining City on a Hill"

To "A global laughingstock"

Online EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 23,528
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2014, 05:56:03 PM »
Never seen Levin's appeal. He writes a good stick, but his show is dire.
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,042
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
    • The place where argument addicts can go
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2014, 06:07:33 PM »
I would not ban Levin's positions, writings from FR or elsewhere.

I find his position regarding updating and modifying our Constitution to be largely a self-serving vehicle to sell books, with a "hook."

Offline Politics4us

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 506
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2014, 06:09:57 PM »
So?  Is Levin off-limits? 

Does he still cut people off and call them "jerks"?  He and Savage are two of the rudest people in talk-radio, unless the caller is kissing his ass.

You are missing the point, and I know you're a Republican establishment hack who is annoyed by Levin. I said Levin is a respected conservative leader who has contributed to FR, and for Jim to ban people who he disagrees with, while allowing John W K to attack Levin with daily threads is ridiculous.

Offline Politics4us

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 506
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2014, 06:10:34 PM »
Never seen Levin's appeal. He writes a good stick, but his show is dire.

His show is entertaining, and he's smart and knowledgeable.

Offline Politics4us

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 506
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #6 on: May 23, 2014, 06:10:58 PM »
I would not ban Levin's positions, writings from FR or elsewhere.


?

Online EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 23,528
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #7 on: May 23, 2014, 06:23:04 PM »
His show is entertaining, and he's smart and knowledgeable.

Maybe I have been unlucky with the streams I have caught. It's possible. But he lectures too much for my taste.
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline AbaraXas

  • Не русский хакер
  • Social Media Advisor
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11,855
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #8 on: May 23, 2014, 06:32:03 PM »
He (John W K) actually calls Levin's Liberty Amendments Socialist here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3158989/posts

Looking through his articles, he has a few screws loose. He strikes me as one of those who try to make the argument a court is illegal because the flag has gold fringe on it. He copies and pastes various blocks of text but it seems he really doesn't understand much of what he is saying or just doesn't read it all. He actually claims here no where in the 16th Amendment is income taxes mentioned:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3154540/posts

Quote from the 16th Amendment to set him straight:
Quote
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.


He also has a habit of personally attacking Jenny Beth Martin (is he her ex or something?)
Example:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3149888/posts
« Last Edit: May 23, 2014, 06:40:32 PM by AbaraXas »

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 28,599
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #9 on: May 23, 2014, 06:58:57 PM »
You are missing the point, and I know you're a Republican establishment hack who is annoyed by Levin. I said Levin is a respected conservative leader who has contributed to FR, and for Jim to ban people who he disagrees with, while allowing John W K to attack Levin with daily threads is ridiculous.

You're new here.  I'm not "Republican establishment" though the Tea Partiers like to pigeon-hole conservatives who disagree with them with that moniker.

Maybe Jim sees through Levin's self-serving ideas, such as his dreamland "Liberty Amendments," which, as someone has already said, is nothing but a blatant pandering to his thronesniffers to buy his book.
From  "A Shining City on a Hill"

To "A global laughingstock"

Offline truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,042
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
    • The place where argument addicts can go
Re: John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR
« Reply #10 on: May 23, 2014, 07:35:34 PM »

?
I would not ban Levin or his attackers.

You would ban Levin's attackers? If so, how FR of you.



Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf