Author Topic: The single most dangerous question to Obama about Benghazi  (Read 161 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 74,503
"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim tribute to patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness -- these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. . . . reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principles."
George Washington

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
Benjamin Franklin

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,695
Re: The single most dangerous question to Obama about Benghazi
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2014, 09:00:03 AM »
Quote
Where exactly within the White House was Barack Hussein Obama, from the time he left the Oval Office at approximately 7:30 p.m. ET, until the following day when he boarded Air Force One destined for Las Vegas, who was he with, and what were the exact nature of his activities during this period?

That sure is a good question.  I'd also like this asked:  What were we doing in and through Benghazi; and did this make murder preferable to rescue? 

Inquiring minds want to know.
"January 20th 2017 will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again."  --  President Donald J. Trump

Offline Chieftain

  • AMF, YOYO
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,633
  • Your what hurts??
Re: The single most dangerous question to Obama about Benghazi
« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2014, 09:20:47 AM »

Offline Chieftain

  • AMF, YOYO
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,633
  • Your what hurts??
Re: The single most dangerous question to Obama about Benghazi
« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2014, 09:29:43 AM »
Please read over the preceding text....

Even though this Act is not enshrined in law, it has served to guide these matters since WWII.  That said there is plenty of wiggle room in there for a slickster like Obama to dodge his responsibilities and get away with it, especially when he has so many people surrounding him who support him absolutely, above any law and especially above that inconvenient Constitution.

The question is, if Obama was not running things in the Situation Room, then who was??  What "Officer" did he put in charge to act in his stead??  If Obama was not available and could not be found, then who stepped up in his place to act as the President, with or without any authority whatsoever??

Remember when Alexander Haig spoke to the press and told them he was in charge immediately after President Reagan was shot??  He was pilloried in the press for that comment even though it did not come across the way he intended it in a hurried response to a pressing reporter during an actual time of National Crisis.  Haig was indeed holding down the fort until the Vice President could be located and brought back to DC, but Haid mis-spoke and paid the price for it. 

Unfortunately we have a professional media who is ready, willing and able to cover for this Administration (and the next one) no matter what it takes.  The President's National Security Adviser is the brother of the President of ABC News.  A relationship like that would never be allowed in a Republican Administration, but it is being exploited to cover Obama's ass no matter what he says or does, or what failed policy rears its ugly head today.



Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf