Author Topic: Christie calls for more aggressive foreign policy  (Read 255 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 255,390
Christie calls for more aggressive foreign policy
« on: May 18, 2014, 09:09:08 PM »
http://news.yahoo.com/christie-calls-more-aggressive-foreign-policy-005146068--election.html


Christie calls for more aggressive foreign policy
Associated Press
By STEVE PEOPLES 14 minutes ago

NEW YORK (AP) — Courting powerful Jewish donors for the second time in two months, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie called Sunday for a more aggressive foreign policy that defends American values abroad — even in "in some very messy, difficult places."

"The rest of the world watches in desperation and hope that America will realize and act upon once again its indispensable place in the world," Christie, a prospective Republican presidential contender, said in a keynote address Sunday at the Champions of Jewish Values International awards gala in New York. "We must lead."

He charged that America must represent the strongest military and economic power, but also "the strongest moral power for what is good and what is right in the world."

The appearance offered Christie a second chance to impress deep-pocketed Jewish donors after stumbling in a recent speech to the Republican Jewish Coalition. Sunday's event also featured Gov. Rick Perry of Texas, Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey and major political donor Sheldon Adelson.

The gathering comes as donors — none bigger than Adelson — begin to size up the crowded field of potential Republican presidential candidates ahead of the 2016 contest. While billed as a nonpartisan affair, there were political references throughout the evening.

Asked if he was running for president, Perry told reporters: "I'm being governor for the next nine months. To be real honest with you I don't know what I'm gonna do after that."

Christie did not talk about his own presidential prospects in a speech that offered aggressive rhetoric but few specifics. He didn't mention Israel, but insisted that America's leaders must send "clear and consistent signals" to those nations it supports and those it doesn't while promoting America's values.

"We need to stand once again loudly for these values," he said. "And sometimes that's going to mean standing in some very messy, difficult places. Standing long and hard for those things that we believe in."

He added: "We will either lead or disappoint. Those are the only two choices. Unfortunately, today, in my opinion, America is disappointing. But it's not too late."

Christie was seated at the same table as Adelson, who figures to play a prominent role in the selection of the next Republican presidential nominee. It was their second meeting over the last two months.

At a Las Vegas gathering of the Republican Jewish Coalition in late March, Adelson met with Christie and several other possible Republican contenders: former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, Ohio Gov. John Kasich and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker.

At the time, Christie, a Catholic, said he was overwhelmed by displays of religious tolerance during a recent trip to Jerusalem.

"I took a helicopter ride from occupied territories across ... and just felt, personally, how extraordinary that was to understand the military risk that Israel faces every day," Christie said.

The comment about "occupied territories" drew sharp criticism from some in the audience. The Israeli government and by extension most of Israel's supporters in the U.S. don't consider the West Bank and East Jerusalem to be occupied territory.

After the speech, Christie met privately with Adelson to explain that he misspoke.

With a net worth estimated at nearly $40 billion, Adelson may be the Republican Party's most influential donor. He is known for his devotion to Israel, in addition to an aggressive American foreign policy.

Adelson donated more than $90 million to Republican candidates and their allies in the 2012 election.

Support the USO

Offline MACVSOG68

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,807
Re: Christie calls for more aggressive foreign policy
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2014, 10:06:49 PM »
It's easy to address Jewish groups with pro-Israel rhetoric today, but most candidates will leave their neo-conservative leanings at home when the campaigns begin in earnest. 
It's the Supreme Court nominations!

Offline Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 47,027
  • Dork
Re: Christie calls for more aggressive foreign policy
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2014, 12:01:35 AM »
It's easy to address Jewish groups with pro-Israel rhetoric today, but most candidates will leave their neo-conservative leanings at home when the campaigns begin in earnest. 

not exactly sure what your point is.  are you saying that when it comes to campaigning, no one (who's anyone) is going to be calling for a stronger US foreign policy?  That they'll all be singing hosannas to the Obama foreign policy?

Offline MACVSOG68

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,807
Re: Christie calls for more aggressive foreign policy
« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2014, 08:08:34 AM »
not exactly sure what your point is.  are you saying that when it comes to campaigning, no one (who's anyone) is going to be calling for a stronger US foreign policy?  That they'll all be singing hosannas to the Obama foreign policy?

I'm saying most of the potential nominees feel comfortable with calling for a stronger US foreign policy today.  When the campaigns begin for real, they will understand that Americans are pretty much war weary, and won't see all the advantages to our military actions in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, etc.  They'll likely be calling for a different foreign policy.  People won't want to hear about a more aggressive approach to dealing with a vastly changing geopolitical landscape.  And most serious voters also understand that our $17 trillion debt is due in no small part to our military enhanced foreign policy.

We won't walk away from Israel or any other friend or ally, but I think the candidates will speak to those issues foreign and domestic that we can realistically impact.  Neocon philosophy isn't going to make a lot of headway in 2016.
It's the Supreme Court nominations!

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 23,836
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
Re: Christie calls for more aggressive foreign policy
« Reply #4 on: May 19, 2014, 08:29:15 AM »
Mate of mine made a very apposite analogy the other day about Obama's military foreign policy. He's taking one of the sharpest scalpels ever made, and using it to spread butter on his toast.
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf