Author Topic: Rep. Peter King Would Run in 2016 Just to Prevent President Cruz or Paul  (Read 602 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 257,519

Support the USO

Offline DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 32,838
The egos on these cretins...it's unbelievable.  :shrug:
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"Journalism is about covering the news.  With a pillow.  Until it stops moving."    - Iowahawk

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,204
  • The income tax: Root of all evil!
    • The FairTax Plan
Peter King couldn't get enough votes to stop Hillary from getting the REPUBLICAN nomination!

He's a legend in his own mind!

Offline alicewonders

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,057
  • Live life-it's too short to butt heads w buttheads
I don't see how Peter King being in the race hurts Rand Paul or Ted Cruz one tiny little bit.  Firstly, they don't even appeal to the same people and secondly, King doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of winning. 

It's funny, I used to have a lot of respect for Peter King - as well as other neocons that I cannot stand now.  I used to donate to NPR, I loved Meet the Press and the McLoughlin Group, and watched CNN regularly.  Those things are alien to me now.  I guess I'm the one who has changed, my eyes are open now. 

Don't tread on me.   8888madkitty

We told you Trump would win - bigly!

Offline MACVSOG68

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,807
Peter King couldn't get enough votes to stop Hillary from getting the REPUBLICAN nomination!

He's a legend in his own mind!

LOL...Agreed.
It's the Supreme Court nominations!

Offline PzLdr

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,421
The New York word for King [from the Yiddish] is "Putz".
Hillary's Self-announced Qualifications: She Stood Up To Putin...She Sits to Pee

Online jmyrlefuller

  • Krampus
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,307
  • Angry goat-like creature
The New York word for King [from the Yiddish] is "Putz".
I was thinking "Schmuck," but that one's reserved for Hillary.

King is delusional. He may draw from an audience, but it won't be the same ones Cruz and Paul draw from and his presence won't make a dent (as others have so duly noted). It is the evangelical wing that poses the greatest threat. Their flank to Santorum in 2012, and to Huckabee in 2008, crippled the nomination process. It needs to unite with the other conservatives if we are to stop Jeb or some other big-money establishment type from winning the primary again.

Offline MACVSOG68

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,807
I was thinking "Schmuck," but that one's reserved for Hillary.

King is delusional. He may draw from an audience, but it won't be the same ones Cruz and Paul draw from and his presence won't make a dent (as others have so duly noted). It is the evangelical wing that poses the greatest threat. Their flank to Santorum in 2012, and to Huckabee in 2008, crippled the nomination process. It needs to unite with the other conservatives if we are to stop Jeb or some other big-money establishment type from winning the primary again.

I agree with respect to King.  But concerning the religious right and their need to unite with other conservatives, I'm not following.  Jeb, whether one likes his stance on immigration reform is a conservative as are most of the other potential candidates.  No he's not from the right wing, but I think he self-identifies as a conservative, or so I've read.  In any case, conservatism isn't just defined by a list of issues, but rather how one approaches them in the larger context of a philosophy of conservatism.  I'm all for uniting, but from what I'm seeing on these "conservative" websites, I'm not comfortable it'll happen any time soon.
It's the Supreme Court nominations!

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,204
  • The income tax: Root of all evil!
    • The FairTax Plan
I agree with respect to King.  But concerning the religious right and their need to unite with other conservatives, I'm not following.  Jeb, whether one likes his stance on immigration reform is a conservative as are most of the other potential candidates.  No he's not from the right wing, but I think he self-identifies as a conservative, or so I've read.  In any case, conservatism isn't just defined by a list of issues, but rather how one approaches them in the larger context of a philosophy of conservatism.  I'm all for uniting, but from what I'm seeing on these "conservative" websites, I'm not comfortable it'll happen any time soon.

It's never going to happen if "unite" continues to mean do it our way or else!

Offline MACVSOG68

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,807
It's never going to happen if "unite" continues to mean do it our way or else!

You mean like having to sign pledge statements...or else?  :pondering:
It's the Supreme Court nominations!

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,204
  • The income tax: Root of all evil!
    • The FairTax Plan
You mean like having to sign pledge statements...or else?  :pondering:

Never supported such silliness and frankly have no idea where you think such a thing is in force.

What I meant was nominate a moderate or else!
« Last Edit: May 18, 2014, 09:26:54 PM by Bigun »

Offline MACVSOG68

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,807
Never supported such silliness and frankly have no idea where you think such a thing is in force.

It's just part of the "our way or else" agenda. In 2012 the written pledges were flying like leaves in fall.  The were designed to make sure the candidate of choice knew specifically what to promise.  Happens every four years on both wings.
It's the Supreme Court nominations!

Offline Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 47,440
  • Chief Dork
Peter "Ralph Nader" King.

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,204
  • The income tax: Root of all evil!
    • The FairTax Plan
It's just part of the "our way or else" agenda. In 2012 the written pledges were flying like leaves in fall.  The were designed to make sure the candidate of choice knew specifically what to promise.  Happens every four years on both wings.

Unless that becomes officially a part of the rules it is meaningless BS and I pay no attention whatever to it.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf