Author Topic: Cruz, Paul, Rubio fight for 2016  (Read 222 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 257,362
Cruz, Paul, Rubio fight for 2016
« on: May 10, 2014, 06:47:13 PM »

Support the USO

Online Once-Ler

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,681
  • How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Trump
Re: Cruz, Paul, Rubio fight for 2016
« Reply #1 on: May 10, 2014, 11:21:00 PM »
"Racism is evil. And those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans."  -  President Donald J Trump

Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!.....
...They have been in our country for many years through no fault of their own - brought in by parents at young age. Plus BIG border security
       Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump 5:35 AM - Sep 14, 2017

Online truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 19,420
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
    • The place where argument addicts can go
Re: Cruz, Paul, Rubio fight for 2016
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2014, 12:23:17 AM »
The GOP has several successful governors, which have a better chance of winning.
"God must love the common man, he made so many of them.�  Abe Lincoln

Offline jmyrlefuller

  • Krampus
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,277
  • Angry goat-like creature
Re: Cruz, Paul, Rubio fight for 2016
« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2014, 09:46:45 AM »
The GOP has several successful governors, which have a better chance of winning.
Sarah Palin was a governor and look how she got treated. Had she run in that primary she would've never made it to Iowa.

As far as the potential names with gubernatorial experience: you have five serious contenders, Walker, Bush, Christie, Perry and Huckabee. Huckabee only appeals to the Bible Belt. Christie has serious issues with what happened in the last week before the 2012 election, among others. Bush-- is a Bush (and we all know how that worked out), and has been awfully friendly with Hillary. Perry fell for the late draft movement trap and bombed out last time; plus, his "let's drag the entire economy to Texas, to Hades with the rest of America" attitude will be a tough sell outside of Texas.

That leaves Scott Walker. He's not particularly glamorous, and he doesn't have the typical Ivy League pedigree, nor is he the smoothest campaigner. That might be trouble, but his record speaks for itself. Unlike Perry, whose record as governor of Texas seemed only to benefit Texas, Walker's signature achievement, the neutering of government worker unions, has widespread ramifications. He's battle-tested, winning election and surviving a recall in a blue state, and still didn't have to compromise his principles to do so. I like Walker.

On the other hand, elections have changed, and as evidenced by Obama not only getting elected, but re-elected when he simply didn't deserve it, charisma is increasingly becoming more important. Walker doesn't have charisma. The senators discussed here, more or less, do. Rand Paul has a built-in libertarian base, much of which he inherited from his father. Ted Cruz can draw the same types that flocked to Palin, without many of the drawbacks Palin had with mind-numbingly dumb commentary. Rubio has the potential for a following among the more conservative Hispanics.

As long as these parties can sort things out before we get to the primaries, and we can have a united front against (probably) Jeb Bush, we'll be fine.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf