Author Topic: FEC chair warns that conservative media like Drudge Report and Sean Hannity face regulation --- like PACs  (Read 517 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 32,834
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"Journalism is about covering the news.  With a pillow.  Until it stops moving."    - Iowahawk

Offline flowers

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,786
They will get this. At some point they will restrict our use of the internet. You can bet on it.


Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 28,691
They will get this. At some point they will restrict our use of the internet. You can bet on it.

How? 
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Offline flowers

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,786
How?
Who is stopping him from anything he has been doing? they will regulate the sites they don't want around.


Offline mountaineer

  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 36,546
How? Executive order. It doesn't matter how unconstitutional it may be.
A day without sunshine is like, you know, night.

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 28,691
How? Executive order. It doesn't matter how unconstitutional it may be.

No. What I meant was, how can our use of the Internet be restricted?

He would have to order providers to block certain websites.  What if they refuse?  You think the little bleep would shut down Verizon? 

He can't restrict jack.  This is goofy conspiracy nonsense.
« Last Edit: May 07, 2014, 06:06:12 PM by sinkspur »
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Offline speekinout

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,337
No. What I meant was, how can our use of the Internet be restricted?

He would have to order providers to block certain websites.  What if they refuse?  You think the little bleep would shut down Verizon? 

He can't restrict jack.  This is goofy conspiracy nonsense.

You forget that he's planning to give ICAAN to the UN. They have control over all web site addresses. They could deny or block any that weren't
"approved", and when they are under control of the UN and not answerable to the US, we don't really know who would decide.
It sounds like conspiracy nonsense, but the steps getting to an Internet control structure are happening.

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 28,691
You forget that he's planning to give ICAAN to the UN. They have control over all web site addresses. They could deny or block any that weren't
"approved", and when they are under control of the UN and not answerable to the US, we don't really know who would decide.
It sounds like conspiracy nonsense, but the steps getting to an Internet control structure are happening.

Could you refer me to a link that says the UN will control the Internet?
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 23,836
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
« Last Edit: May 07, 2014, 07:20:52 PM by EC »
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline speekinout

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,337
Thanks EC, for posting that link. Sinkspur, that's what I was talking about. And I notice that I had a typo - it's ICANN, not ICAAN.

I really do think this is something to worry about.

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 28,691
Thanks EC, for posting that link. Sinkspur, that's what I was talking about. And I notice that I had a typo - it's ICANN, not ICAAN.

I really do think this is something to worry about.

I don't.  Nobody "controls" the Internet.    And the idea that somebody or entity would be sitting around monitoring conservative sites is laughable. 

How otherwise sane people get sucked into these goofball conspiracies is beyond me.
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 23,836
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
Thanks EC, for posting that link. Sinkspur, that's what I was talking about. And I notice that I had a typo - it's ICANN, not ICAAN.

I really do think this is something to worry about.

NP. Happened to have it open already - working up an article about the whole thing.
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 23,836
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
I don't.  Nobody "controls" the Internet.    And the idea that somebody or entity would be sitting around monitoring conservative sites is laughable. 

How otherwise sane people get sucked into these goofball conspiracies is beyond me.

Ever been to vikingkitties? That is one person, who is a wonderful person - warm and compassionate - but uses their down time to collect the worst insanity over on TOS. Or head over to reddit and hunt out /srs. If individuals can do it, the government certainly can and does. After all - every single post you make, anywhere, can be considered metadata.

It is unlike you to be so trusting.
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline speekinout

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,337
I don't.  Nobody "controls" the Internet.    And the idea that somebody or entity would be sitting around monitoring conservative sites is laughable. 

How otherwise sane people get sucked into these goofball conspiracies is beyond me.

This isn't about anyone monitoring what goes on in the net. It's about controlling the addresses. You can't "talk" to anyone unless you know their address and they know yours. And you can't post on a site like this one unless it has an address that is recognized. Certainly, without ICANN, individuals could link computers and talk to each other. One big advantage of today's internet is that we can find and connect to people we've never met. GBR could be here without ICANN, but how would any of us find it? If we have to depend on addresses we get from friends, we're pretty limited in what we can find or who we can talk to.
Maybe we're spoiled by having had a free internet for so long, but it is a resource that we should want to protect. Once it's gone, it will be very hard to get back.



Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf